Ontology Mapping: The State of the Art
Citations
1,285 citations
Cites background from "Ontology Mapping: The State of the ..."
...The survey of [39] focuses on current state of the art in ontology matching....
[...]
...Good surveys through the recent years are provided in [39, 62, 75]; while the major contributions of the last decades are presented in [3, 41, 42, 66]....
[...]
1,215 citations
Cites methods from "Ontology Mapping: The State of the ..."
...In order to illustrate the matching problem let us use the two simple ontologies, O1 and O2, of Figure 1....
[...]
...F...
[...]
1,142 citations
Cites background or methods from "Ontology Mapping: The State of the ..."
...[14] Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer....
[...]
...Please see a paper by Kalfoglou and Schorlemmer [15] for a comprehensive review....
[...]
...The normalization process therefore often precedes ontology-matching [15] and translates source ontologies to the same language, resolving these differences....
[...]
...Hence, the task of finding mappings (semi-) automatically has been an active area of research in both database and ontology communities [22, 15]....
[...]
...[15] Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer....
[...]
683 citations
Cites methods from "Ontology Mapping: The State of the ..."
...To reduce the manual effort required, many techniques and prototypes have been developed to semi-automatically solve the match problem [6], [11]....
[...]
609 citations
References
4,757 citations
"Ontology Mapping: The State of the ..." refers background or methods in this paper
...It is based on Ganter and Wille’s work on formal concept analysis (Ganter & Wille, 1999) and lattice exploration....
[...]
...…Stumme and Maedche’s ontology merging methodology FCA-Merge (see Section 3.2) is not exactly an “IF-based” approach, it is nevertheless closely related to these approaches by virtue that formal concept analysis (Ganter & Wille, 1999) shares with channel theory the same mathematical foundations....
[...]
...This task cannot be automated, and hence we may need to depend on heuristics to identify a small number of attribute pairs that may be potentially related by a relationship other than is_disjoint_with....
[...]
...It is also difficult to decouple the heterogeneity due to differences in DBMSs from those resulting from semantic heterogeneity....
[...]
...Priss suggests that techniques from formal concept analysis (Ganter & Wille, 1999) could be used to provide formal representations of context and concepts of a consensual sign triad....
[...]
3,693 citations
"Ontology Mapping: The State of the ..." refers background or methods in this paper
... Rahm and Bernstein (2001) present a survey on approaches to automatic database schema matching....
[...]
...In Section 3.8 we reported on the work of Rahm and Bernstein (2001) on database schema matching, and the survey of Sheth and Larson (1990) on federated databases....
[...]
...…a number of different communities: Pinto et al. (1999) elaborate and compare issues for ontology integration, Visser et al. (1998) identify a typology of ontology mismatches, Rahm and Bernstein (2001) report on database schema matching, and Sheth and Larson (1990) survey federated database systems....
[...]
...The following surveys originate from a number of different communities: Pinto et al. (1999) elaborate and compare issues for ontology integration, Visser et al. (1998) identify a typology of ontology mismatches, Rahm and Bernstein (2001) report on database schema matching, and Sheth and...
[...]
...Rahm and Bernstein (2001) present a survey on approaches to automatic database schema matching....
[...]
2,376 citations
2,216 citations
"Ontology Mapping: The State of the ..." refers background or methods in this paper
...In an experiment of ontology reuse (Uschold et al., 1998), researchers working at Boeing were investigating the potential of using an existing ontology for the purpose of specifying and formally developing software for aircraft design....
[...]
...If this is not the case, one may still establish weak translation, where a partial (or strong) translation can be defined after one foundational theory is interpreted into the other (in the usual sense of a theory interpretation; see, for instance, Enderton (2001))....
[...]
...There could be simple semantic bridges, like attribute bridges which are one-to-one correspondences of attributes, like the o1:Individual:name and o2:Individual:name, as well as complex bridges which take into account structural information....
[...]
...…ontology is specified as a logical theory and that the several participating community ontologies extend the common generic ontology according to theory interpretations (in its traditional sense as consequence-preserving mappings; see Enderton (2001)), and consists of the following steps: 1....
[...]
2,029 citations