scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimization and techno-economic assessment of rooftop photovoltaic system

15 May 2019-Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy (AIP Publishing LLC AIP Publishing)-Vol. 11, Iss: 3, pp 033501
TL;DR: In this paper, the performance of the rooftop photovoltaic (PV) system, taking into account its shading impact on the rooftop surface and the eventual cooling load of the building, is analyzed.
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to analyze the performance of the rooftop photovoltaic (PV) system, taking into account its shading impact on the rooftop surface and the eventual cooling load of the building. This paper tests three approaches of the rooftop PV system: zero tilt angle flat PV configuration; PV configuration with a monthly adjusted tilt angle; and PV configuration with a dual-axis sun tracking system. Each of the PV configurations is optimized to do the following: minimize the self-shading among the adjacent arrays; maximize the rooftop surface shading to curtail the cooling load; maximize the net energy yield; and minimize the net levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of the PV system. The existing building model is developed in SketchUp Pro. The model is simulated in an EnergyPlus environment to calculate the building's cooling energy consumption with different shading scenarios in various PV configurations. Various rooftop PV configurations are designed and simulated in a System Advisor Model (SAM) to analyze the effect of self-shading of the adjacent PV arrays on the PV performance. The optimal distance between the arrays (for maximum net energy yield and minimum net LCOE) is found to be 1.5 m. The net LCOE of the optimal scenario is 5.247 ¢/kW h and 4.112 ¢/kW h for monthly tilt and dual-axis tracking arrangements, respectively. The economic surplus of the optimized system is 0.422 ¢/kW h and 0.258 ¢/kW h for the monthly tilt and dual-axis tracking arrangements, respectively, as compared to the ground-mounted system.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented a feasibility evaluation for a grid-connected photovoltaic energy conversion system on the rooftop of a typical residential building in Jeddah, one of the major cities in Saudi Arabia.
Abstract: This paper presents a techno-economic feasibility evaluation for a grid-connected photovoltaic energy conversion system on the rooftop of a typical residential building in Jeddah, one of the major cities in Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, electric energy consumption is the highest in the domestic sector, with 48.1% of the total electricity consumption. As the power generation in Saudi Arabia mainly relies on conventional resources, environmental pollution and energy sustainability are major concerns. To minimize these issues, the Saudi government is in the process of maximizing the utilization of renewable energy resources for power generation. Investing in solar energy in Saudi Arabia is important because the country is witnessing a rapid increase in load demand, with annual growth rates of 6%. In this paper, the system advisor model software for renewable energy modeling has been utilized to perform a techno-economic feasibility analysis of a residential grid-connected solar photovoltaic (PV) system, which is proposed for a typical apartment in Saudi Arabia, on the basis of various key performance indicators, namely: yield factor, capacity factor, performance ratio, levelized cost of energy, net present value, internal rate of return, and payback period. A sensitivity analysis that investigates the impact of varying techno-economic parameters on system performance and feasibility is also discussed. The size of the PV system for a typical Saudi Arabian apartment is estimated to be 12.25 kW. Results have shown that the proposed system can generate 87% of the electricity needs of an apartment. The technical analysis showed that the capacity factor and the performance ratio were 22% and 78% respectively. The levelized cost of energy and net present value revealed competitive figures of 0.0382 $/kWh and $4378, respectively. The investigations indicate that residential PV installations are an effective option for energy management in the country.

65 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a detailed comparative analysis for the two solar technologies namely: photovoltaic (PV) and dish Stirling engine (DSE) was performed for the same rated capacity of 1MW for Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

42 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 May 2020-Energy
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared two main technologies of solar to electrical energy conversion, namely solar tower (ST) and photovoltaic (PV), and provided very useful guidelines for the policymakers to select a particular technology for the future solar-based power generation projects.

25 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Jul 2020-Energies
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors performed an in-depth performance comparison of ground-mounted and rooftop photovoltaic (PV) systems, with the aim being to minimize the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) and maximize the energy yield.
Abstract: The aim of this research is to perform an in-depth performance comparison of ground-mounted and rooftop photovoltaic (PV) systems. The PV modules are tilted to receive maximum solar irradiance. The efficiency of the PV system decreases due to the mutual shading impact of parallel tilted PV modules. The mutual shading decreases with the increasing interrow distance of parallel PV modules, but a distance that is too large causes an increase in land cost in the case of ground-mounted configuration and a decrease in roof surface shading in the case of rooftop configuration, because larger sections of roof are exposed to sun radiation. Therefore, an optimized interrow distance for the two PV configurations is determined with the aim being to minimize the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) and maximize the energy yield. The model of the building is simulated in EnergyPlus software to determine the cooling load requirement and roof surface temperatures under different shading scenarios. The layout of the rooftop PV system is designed in Helioscope software. A detailed comparison of the two systems is carried out based on energy output, performance ratio, capacity utilization factor (CUF), energy yield, and LCoE. Compared to ground-mounted configuration, the rooftop PV configuration results in a 2.9% increase in CUF, and up to a 23.7% decrease in LCoE. The results of this research show that installing a PV system on a roof has many distinct advantages over ground-mounted PV systems such as the shading of the roof, which leads to the curtailment of the cooling energy requirements of the buildings in hot regions and land cost savings, especially for urban environments.

19 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic literature review was carried out, analyzing the main studies related to the topic and identifying the main factors that may financially affect investments in photovoltaic energy systems.
Abstract: The introduction of environmental impact targets around the world has highlighted the need to adopt alternative sources of energy, which can supply the demand and mitigate the damage caused to the environment. Solar energy is one of the main sources of alternative energy, and is considered an abundant source of clean energy. However, to facilitate and encourage investors interested in the installation of photovoltaic energy systems for electricity production, it is essential to evaluate the factors that impact the economic viability of the projects. Therefore, the objective of this research is to present a systematic analytical framework, in order to identify and analyze the main factors that impact the financial feasibility of projects for the installation of photovoltaic energy plants. For this purpose, a systematic literature review was carried out, analyzing the main studies related to the topic and identifying the main factors that may financially affect investments in photovoltaic energy systems. From this review, 29 influencing factors were identified and separated into five categories, namely, location, economic, political, climatic and environmental, and technical factors. The main factors highlighted are the investment cost, power generation, operation and maintenance costs, solar radiation, lifetime, energy tariff, efficiency, electricity consumption, and interest and taxes. The results may assist policy makers, investors, researchers, and other stakeholders to identify the key factors that are being examined in the literature, and to evaluate which ones should be considered in their study to ensure the sustainable development of power generation through the solar source.

18 citations


Cites background from "Optimization and techno-economic as..."

  • ...(2019) Brazil Engenharia Agricola [7] Awan (2019) Saudi Arabia Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy [10] Tervo et al....

    [...]

  • ...Furthermore, to avoid the shading effect, which decreases the performance efficiency of the PV arrays, the distance between the PV modules has to be sufficiently high [7], limiting the area available for PV array installation....

    [...]

  • ...…Locations Journals [3] Karimi et al. (2019) Iran Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy [4] Viana et al. (2019) Brazil Engenharia Agricola [7] Awan (2019) Saudi Arabia Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy [10] Tervo et al. (2018) United States Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews…...

    [...]

  • ...Authors Locations Journals [3] Karimi et al. (2019) Iran Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy [4] Viana et al. (2019) Brazil Engenharia Agricola [7] Awan (2019) Saudi Arabia Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy [10] Tervo et al. (2018) United States Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews [11] Cucchiella et al. (2018) Italy Sustainability [17] Bimenyimana et al. (2019) Rwanda International Journal of Photoenergy [18] Lee (2019) South Korea Renewable Energy [19] Babatunde et al. (2019) Nigeria African Journal of Science Technology Innovation &Development [20] Yendaluru et al. (2019) India Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy [21] Ellabban and Alassi (2019) Australia Energy Reports [22] Mehrpooya et al. (2019) Iran Energy Reports [23] Goswami et al. (2019) India Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy [24] Lopes et al. (2019) Brazil Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management [25] Kang et al. (2019) South Korea Energy & Environment [26] Ilse et al. (2019) Germany Joule [27] Ramanan et al. (2019) India Building Services Engineering Research & Technology [28] Ouedraogo and Yamegueu (2019) Burkina Faso Energy Science & Engineering [29] Adesanya and Pearce (2019) Nigeria Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews [30] Silveira et al. (2019) Brazil Navus-Revista de Gestao e Tecnologia [31] Alhaj and Al-Ghamdi (2019) Qatar Solar Energy [32] Barone et al. (2019) Greece Energy Conversion and Management [33] Garcia-Saez et al. (2019) Spain Renewable Energy [34] Jo and Jang (2019) South Korea Sustainability [35] Eshraghi et al. (2019) Iran Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments [36] Li (2019) China Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Utilization andEnvironmental Effects [37] Kumar et al. (2019) India Energy [38] Liu et al. (2019) Australia International Journal of Electrical Power & EnergySystems [39] Buonomano et al. (2019) Italy Renewable Energy [40] Farias-Rocha et al. (2019) Philippines Journal of Cleaner Production [41] Chiacchio et al. (2019) Italy Energies [42] Jamali et al. (2019) Iran Solar Energy [43] Espinoza et al. (2019) Peru Renewable Energy [44] Wang et al. (2019) Turkey Journal of Cleaner Production [45] Milousi et al. (2019) Greece Sustainability [46] Xu et al. (2019) Pakistan Processes [47] Lammoglia and Brandalise (2019) Brazil Independent Journal of Management & Production [48] Leite et al. (2019) Brazil Energy Conversion and Management [49] Asif et al. (2019) Saudi Arabia Smart and Sustainable Built Environment [50] Talavera et al. (2019) Spain Renewable Energy [51] Gurturk (2019) Turkey Energy [52] Mostafaeipour et al. (2019) Iran Desalination [53] Talavera et al. (2019) Spain Energies [54] Brunini et al. (2019) Brazil Revista Brasileira De Ciencias Agrarias-Agraria [55] De Lara et al. (2019) Brazil Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology [56] Mohammad and Ismael (2019) Iraq Aims Energy [57] Kharseh and Wallbaum (2019) Sweden Energies [58] You et al. (2018) China Energy [59] Lee et al. (2018) South Korea Applied Energy [60] Al-Saqlawi et al. (2018) Oman Energy Conversion and Management [61] McTigue et al. (2018) United States Applied Energy [62] Kassem et al. (2018) Cyprus Global Journal of Environmental Science andManagement-Gjesm [63] Poonia et al. (2018) India Cogent Engineering [64] San Miguel and Corona (2018) Spain Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews [65] Mohammadi et al. (2018) Iran Energy Sustainability 2020, 12, 7173 6 of 40 Table 2....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a silicon heterojunction with interdigitated back contacts was presented, achieving an efficiency of 26.3% and a detailed loss analysis to guide further developments.
Abstract: The efficiency of silicon solar cells has a large influence on the cost of most photovoltaics panels. Here, researchers from Kaneka present a silicon heterojunction with interdigitated back contacts reaching an efficiency of 26.3% and provide a detailed loss analysis to guide further developments.

2,052 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a review of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessments for radioactive waste disposal is presented. But, the most widely used technique for performance assessment is Monte Carlo analysis.

689 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed long-term solar radiation data of a residential building in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (K.S.A) to assess the feasibility of utilizing hybrid PV-diesel-battery power systems to meet the load of a typical residential building.
Abstract: The growing concerns of global warming and depleting oil/gas reserves have made it inevitable to seek energy from renewable energy resources. Many nations are embarking on introduction of clean/renewable solar energy for displacement of oil-produced energy. Moreover, solar photovoltaic (PV)–diesel hybrid power generation system technology is an emerging energy option since it promises great deal of challenges and opportunities for developed and developing countries. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (K.S.A) being enriched with higher level of solar radiation, is a prospective candidate for deployment of solar PV systems. Literature indicates that commercial/residential buildings in K.S.A. consume about 10–45% of the total electric energy generated. The aim of this study is to analyze long-term solar radiation data of Dhahran (East-Coast, K.S.A.) to assess the techno-economic feasibility of utilizing hybrid PV–diesel–battery power systems to meet the load of a typical residential building (with annual electrical energy demand of 35,120 kWh). The monthly average daily solar global radiation ranges from 3.61 to 7.96 kwh/m 2 . National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewable (HOMER) software has been employed to carry out the present study. The simulation results indicate that for a hybrid system composed of 4 kWp PV system together with 10 kW diesel system and a battery storage of 3 h of autonomy (equivalent to 3 h of average load), the PV penetration is 22%. The cost of generating energy (COE, US$/kWh) from the above hybrid system has been found to be 0.179 $/kWh (assuming diesel fuel price of 0.1$/l). The study exhibits that for a given hybrid configuration, the operational hours of diesel generators decrease with increase in PV capacity. The investigation also examines the effect of PV/battery penetration on COE, operational hours of diesel gensets for a given hybrid system. Concurrently, attention is focussed on un-met load, excess electricity generation, fuel savings and reduction in carbon emissions (for different scenarios such as PV–diesel without storage, PV–diesel with storage, as compared to diesel-only situation), COE of different hybrid systems, cost of PV–diesel–battery systems, etc.

245 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of different parameters on comparative measurements of ground and airborne spray drift employing the ISO22866:2005 protocol were evaluated in orchard and vineyard at late growth stage.
Abstract: Spray drift assessment encompasses classification of the capacity of each sprayer/technology/setting combination to reduce or avoid the spray drift risk, as well as drift measurement to define buffer zones mandated during pesticide application. Compounding the challenge of these tasks is the great variability of field evaluation results from environmental conditions, spray application technology, canopy structure, and measurement procedures. This study, performed in Spanish context, evaluates the effects of different parameters on comparative measurements of ground and airborne spray drift employing the ISO22866:2005 protocol. Four configurations of air blast sprayers, derived from two fan airflow rates and two nozzle types (conventional and air-induction), were tested in orchard and vineyard at late growth stage. Spray drift curves were obtained, from which corresponding Drift Values (DVs) were calculated using an approximation of definite integral. Both sprayer settings and environmental variables statistically affect spray drift total amounts and result variability. PCA analysis showed that nozzle type and wind speed characteristics explained 51% and 24% of the variance, respectively. In particular, mean wind direction influence ground sediments (Pr < 0.01) and maximum wind speed strongly influence airborne drift value (Pr < 0.0001). The wind characteristics concealed the influence of adopted fan airflow rates on final spray drift assessment results. The effect of uncontrollable environmental conditions makes objective and comparative tests difficult.

234 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the potential of PV self-consumption for four different building types (residential and commercial, each large and small) in Germany, Switzerland and Austria.

168 citations