Optimization of SLM Process Parameters for Ti6Al4V Medical Implants
read more
Citations
Defects in additive manufactured metals and their effect on fatigue performance: A state-of-the-art review
Multi-Scale Surface Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: A Review
Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds
Additive Manufacturing Technologies for Drug Delivery Applications.
Analysis of the effect of surface roughness on fatigue performance of powder bed fusion additive manufactured metals
References
Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys
A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V
Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration
Selective laser melting of iron-based powder
Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: Process optimisation and mechanical properties development
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. What were the measurements used to determine the quality of the fabricated samples?
Porosity content, surface roughness, elastic modulus and compressive strength (UCS) were measured as outputs to better understand the quality characteristics of the fabricated samples.
Q3. What is the effect of laser power on surface roughness?
In addition, the increased laser power increases the energy density which improves the wettability of the melt pool, eliminating the differences in surface tension and in turn decreasing the chance of encountering the balling phenomenon which dramatically decreases the side surface roughness [2].
Q4. What is the effect of increasing the scan speed and hatch spacing on the melt pool?
Increasing the scan speed and hatch spacing and/or a decrease in the laser power shall reduce the melt pool and lead to incomplete consolidation.
Q5. What is the effect of low scan speed on the overlapping area of adjacent lines?
Small hatching spacing would increase the overlapping area of adjacent scanning lines, resulting in a complete melting of the powderbetween scanning lines.
Q6. How many GPa did a structure with a porosity of 43 and 80?
During the manufacturing of Ti6Al4V open-porous scaffolds using SLM, Weißmann and co-authors [43] concluded that a structure with a porosity % between 43 and 80 experienced an elastic modulus in the range from 26.3 to 3.4 GPa and an UCS in the range from 750 to 100 MPa.
Q7. How many GPa would be predicted for a SLM part?
In the current study it was predicted that at 23.62% porosity the elastics modulus and UCS of the SLM part would be 30 GPa and 522 MPa, respectively.
Q8. What is the effect of stress shielding on the implant?
Stress shielding prevents the needed stress being transferred from the implant to adjacent bone, which might result in bone loss in the near-vicinity of implants.
Q9. What is the role of pores in the fabrication of titanium implants?
Their results showed that creating pores in a Ti6Al4V part had a significant role in reducing its stiffness, which could allow the implant to have an elastic modulus that is close to that of human cortical bone.
Q10. What is the way to make a Ti implant?
In biomedical applications, a Ti implant with structure similar to that in sample 2 is recommended as it has low elastic modulus.
Q11. What was the effect of decreasing the porosity % on the elastic modulus?
Decreasing the porosity % from 25.43 to 2.94 resulted in a significant increase in the elastic modulus from 17 to 75 GPa, and a comparable rise in the UCS from 388 to 1749 MPa.
Q12. What is the way to use the implants?
for biomedical application, implants with rough surfaces are preferred to allow tissues to grow inside and integrating them to the hosting bones.