scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Pain Improvement in Parkinson's Disease Patients Treated with Safinamide: Results from the SAFINONMOTOR Study.

TL;DR: The SAFINONMOTOR study as discussed by the authors showed that SAFINamide is well tolerated and improves pain in Parkinson's disease patients at 6 months, compared to a placebo drug, and the improvement was observed in musculoskeletal and radicular pain.
Abstract: Background and objective: Pain is a frequent and disabling symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. Our aim was to analyze the effectiveness of safinamide on pain in PD patients from the SAFINONMOTOR (an open-label study of the effectiveness of SAFInamide on NON-MOTOR symptoms in Parkinson´s disease patients) study. Material and Methods: SAFINONMOTOR is a prospective open-label single-arm study conducted in five centers from Spain. In this analysis, a secondary objective of the study, the score in the KPPS (King´s Parkinson´s Disease Pain Scale) at V1 (baseline) and V4 (6 months ± 1 month) were compared. Wilcoxon´s rank sum test was performed to test the changes from V1 to V4. Results: Forty-four (88%) out of 50 PD patients (age 68.5 ± 9.12 years; 58% women; 6.4 ± 5.1 years from diagnosis) completed the study. The KPPS total score was reduced by 43.6% (from 40.04 ± 36.18 in V1 to 22.60 ± 21.42 in V4; p < 0.0001). By domains, improvement was observed in musculoskeletal (−35.9%; p = 0.009), fluctuation-related (−51.7%; p = 0.020), nocturnal (−46.1%; p = 0.001), discoloration and/or edema/swelling (−50.4%; p = 0.009) and radicular pain (−40.1%; p = 0.048). A total of 21 adverse events in 11 patients (22%) were reported, five being severe, but not related to safinamide. Conclusion: Safinamide is well tolerated and improves pain in PD patients at 6 months. Future studies are necessary to analyze the possible beneficial effect of safinamide on pain in PD patients.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The MAO-B inhibitors have gained considerable status in the therapy of the Parkinson's disease as discussed by the authors since the 1980s and have been used in both mono-and combination therapies.
Abstract: Since the 1980s, the MAO-B inhibitors have gained considerable status in the therapy of the Parkinson's disease. In addition to the symptomatic effect in mono- and combination therapies, a neuroprotective effect has repeatedly been a matter of some discussion, which has unfortunately led to a good many misunderstandings. Due to potential interactions, selegiline has declined in significance in the field. For the MAO-B inhibitor safinamide, recently introduced to the market, an additional inhibition of pathological release of glutamate has been postulated. At present, rasagiline and selegiline are being administered in early therapy as well as in combination with levodopa. Safinamide has been approved only for combination therapy with levodopa when motor fluctuations have occurred. MAO-B inhibitors are a significant therapeutic option for Parkinson's disease, an option which is too often not appreciated properly.

12 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematic review of the QOL and NMS outcomes from the available clinical studies of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-BIs), selegiline, rasagiline and safinamide, has been conducted in this paper .
Abstract: Abstract Non-motor symptoms (NMS) are common among patients with Parkinson’s disease and reduce patients’ quality of life (QOL). However, there remain considerable unmet needs for NMS management. Three monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-BIs), selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide, have become commercially available in many countries. Although an increasing number of studies have reported potential beneficial effects of MAO-BIs on QOL and NMS, there has been no consensus. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date systematic review of the QOL and NMS outcomes from the available clinical studies of MAO-BIs. We conducted a literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases in November 2021. We identified 60 publications relevant to this topic. Overall, rasagiline and safinamide had more published evidence on QOL and NMS changes compared with selegiline. This was likely impacted by selegiline being introduced many years prior to the field embarking on the study of NMS. The impact of MAO-BIs on QOL was inconsistent across studies, and this was unlikely to be clinically meaningful. MAO-BIs may potentially improve depression, sleep disturbances, and pain. In contrast, cognitive and olfactory dysfunctions are likely unresponsive to MAO-BIs. Given the paucity of evidence and controlled, long-term studies, the effects of MAO-BIs on fatigue, autonomic dysfunctions, apathy, and ICD remain unclear. The effects of MAO-BIs on static and fluctuating NMS have never been investigated systematically. More high-quality studies will be needed and should enable clinicians to provide personalized medicine based on a non-motor symptom profile.

6 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematic review of the QOL and NMS outcomes from the available clinical studies of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-BIs), selegiline, rasagiline and safinamide, has been conducted in this article .
Abstract: Abstract Non-motor symptoms (NMS) are common among patients with Parkinson’s disease and reduce patients’ quality of life (QOL). However, there remain considerable unmet needs for NMS management. Three monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-BIs), selegiline, rasagiline, and safinamide, have become commercially available in many countries. Although an increasing number of studies have reported potential beneficial effects of MAO-BIs on QOL and NMS, there has been no consensus. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date systematic review of the QOL and NMS outcomes from the available clinical studies of MAO-BIs. We conducted a literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases in November 2021. We identified 60 publications relevant to this topic. Overall, rasagiline and safinamide had more published evidence on QOL and NMS changes compared with selegiline. This was likely impacted by selegiline being introduced many years prior to the field embarking on the study of NMS. The impact of MAO-BIs on QOL was inconsistent across studies, and this was unlikely to be clinically meaningful. MAO-BIs may potentially improve depression, sleep disturbances, and pain. In contrast, cognitive and olfactory dysfunctions are likely unresponsive to MAO-BIs. Given the paucity of evidence and controlled, long-term studies, the effects of MAO-BIs on fatigue, autonomic dysfunctions, apathy, and ICD remain unclear. The effects of MAO-BIs on static and fluctuating NMS have never been investigated systematically. More high-quality studies will be needed and should enable clinicians to provide personalized medicine based on a non-motor symptom profile.

4 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the effect of safinamide treatment on non-motor symptoms (NMS) and quality of life in motor-fluctuating PD patients was explored through validated sales.
Abstract: Abstract Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by motor symptoms often experienced in concomitance with non-motor symptoms (NMS), such as depression, apathy, pain, sleep disorders, and urinary dysfunction. The present study aimed to explore the effect of safinamide treatment on NMS and quality of life in motor-fluctuating PD patients. VALE-SAFI is an observational single-centre study performed in fluctuating PD patients starting safinamide treatment and followed for 6 months. The effects of safinamide on NMS, sleep, fatigue, depression and pain were assessed through validated sales. Changes in the scales from baseline to the 6-month follow-up visit were analysed. 60 PD patients (66.67% males) were enrolled at baseline, and 45 patients completed the 6-month follow-up. PD patients improved motor symptoms at follow-up, with the significant reduction of motor fluctuations. The global score of the NMS Scale significantly decreased between baseline and the follow-up. Regarding pain domains, patients reported a significant improvement in discolouration and oedema/swelling. Further, a significant improvement was observed from baseline to follow-up in sleep quality measured through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, while no changes were documented in daytime sleepiness. No differences were found in depression and fatigue between baseline and follow-up. Finally, the patient’s perception of the impact of PD on functioning and well-being decreased from baseline to follow-up. The present findings confirmed the beneficial effect of safinamide on both motor and non-motor symptoms, also improving the quality of life of PD patients. Furthermore, these data support the positive effects of safinamide on pain and mood, as well as on sleep quality and continuity.

1 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a comprehensive review of pain in Parkinson's disease by identifying different clinical features and potential mechanisms, and presenting some data on the evaluation and management of pain, is presented.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The dopaminergic basis of the range of non-motor symptoms that occur in PD such as depression, apathy, sleep disorders (including rapid-eye movement sleep behaviour disorder), and erectile dysfunction are investigated.
Abstract: Several studies, including work from the Parkinson's disease (PD) non-motor group and others, have established that the non-motor symptoms of PD are common, occur across all stages of PD, are under-reported, and are a key determinant of quality of life. Research suggests that the non-motor symptoms of the disease are frequently unrecognised by clinicians and remain untreated. Even when identified, there is a common perception that many of these symptoms are untreatable. The role of dopaminergic drugs in treating the various non-motor problems of PD, although clinically recognised, has received little attention. In this Review, we investigate the dopaminergic basis of the range of non-motor symptoms that occur in PD such as depression, apathy, sleep disorders (including rapid-eye movement sleep behaviour disorder), and erectile dysfunction. We discuss the evidence that these symptoms are treatable, at least in part, with various dopaminergic strategies and, where relevant, we also refer to the use of deep-brain stimulation of appropriate targets in the brain. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of the management of this challenging aspect of PD.

1,456 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The main focus of this article is to operationalize the diagnosis of PD‐D and to propose pratical guidelines based on a two level process depending upon the clinical scenario and the expertise of the evaluator involved in the assessment.
Abstract: A preceding article described the clinical features of Parkinson's disease dementia (PD-D) and proposed clinical diagnostic criteria for "probable" and "possible" PD-D. The main focus of this article is to operationalize the diagnosis of PD-D and to propose practical guidelines based on a two level process depending upon the clinical scenario and the expertise of the evaluator involved in the assessment. Level I is aimed primarily at the clinician with no particular expertise in neuropsychological methods, but who requires a simple, pragmatic set of tests that are not excessively time-consuming. Level I can be used alone or in concert with Level II, which is more suitable when there is the need to specify the pattern and the severity on the dementia of PD-D for clinical monitoring, research studies or pharmacological trials. Level II tests can also be proposed when the diagnosis of PD-D remains uncertain or equivocal at the end of a Level I evaluation. Given the lack of evidence-based standards for some tests when applied in this clinical context, we have tried to make practical and unambiguous recommendations, based upon the available literature and the collective experience of the Task Force. We accept, however, that further validation of certain tests and modifications in the recommended cut off values will be required through future studies.

907 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 1995-Pain
TL;DR: The role of the striatum, globus pallidus and substantia nigra in nociceptive sensorimotor integration and suggests several roles of these basal ganglia structures in nOCiception and pain are explored.
Abstract: The involvement of the basal ganglia in motor functions has been well studied. Recent neurophysiological, clinical and behavioral experiments indicate that the basal ganglia also process non-noxious and noxious somatosensory information. However, the functional significance of somatosensory information processing within the basal ganglia is not well understood. This review explores the role of the striatum, globus pallidus and substantia nigra in nociceptive sensorimotor integration and suggests several roles of these basal ganglia structures in nociception and pain. Electrophysiological experiments have detailed the non-nociceptive and nociceptive response properties of basal ganglia neurons. Most studies agree that some neurons within the basal ganglia encode stimulus intensity. However, these neurons do not appear to encode stimulus location since the receptive fields of these cells are large. Many basal ganglia neurons responsive to somatosensory stimulation are activated exclusively or differentially by noxious stimulation. Indirect techniques used to measure neuronal activity (i.e., positron emission tomography and 2-deoxyglucose methods) also indicate that the basal ganglia are activated differentially by noxious stimulation. Neuroanatomical experiments suggest several pathways by which nociceptive information may reach the basal ganglia. Neuroanatomical studies have also indicated that the basal ganglia are rich in many different neuroactive chemicals that may be involved in the modulation of nociceptive information. Microinjection of opiates, dopamine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) into the basal ganglia have varied effects on pain behavior. Administration of these neurochemicals into the basal ganglia affects supraspinal pain behaviors more consistently than spinal reflexive behaviors. The reduction of pain behavior following electrical stimulation of the substantia nigra and caudate nucleus provides additional evidence for a role of the basal ganglia in pain modulation. Some patients with basal ganglia disease (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease) have alterations in pain sensation in addition to motor abnormalities. Frequently, these patients have intermittent pain that is difficult to localize. Collectively, these data suggest that the basal ganglia may be involved in the (1) sensory-discriminative dimension of pain, (2) affective dimension of pain, (3) cognitive dimension of pain, (4) modulation of nociceptive information and (5) sensory gating of nociceptive information to higher motor areas. Further experiments that correlate neuronal discharge activity with stimulus intensity and escape behavior in operantly conditioned animals are necessary to fully understand how the basal ganglia are involved in nociceptive sensorimotor integration.

581 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: The UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank receives tissue from patients with Parkinson's disease and a variety of different movement disorders, with the expanding number of other specialist brain banks there is a need for agreement on diagnostic criteria.
Abstract: The UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank receives tissue from patients with Parkinson's disease and a variety of different movement disorders. Half of the brain is used for full neuropathological examination prior to allocation for specific research projects. Clinical misdiagnosis occurs in a significant proportion of cases and clinico-pathological correlation provides valuable information for disease recognition. With the expanding number of other specialist brain banks there is a need for agreement on diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, awareness of different methods of tissue handling is essential.

484 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2009-Pain
TL;DR: Pain is frequent and disabling, independent of demographic and clinical variables except for female gender, and is significantly more common in Parkinson’s patients compared to the general population and is not associated with age, disease duration or severity of the disease.
Abstract: Parkinson’s disease is a chronic, progressive, incurable neurodegenerative disease. As the disease progresses, motor disturbances and non-motor symptoms represent considerable illness burdens. Symptom relief is the goal for the treatment. Pain is frequently observed in patients with Parkinson’s disease, but its prevalence, characteristics and associations with Parkinson’s disease are poorly documented. These were investigated in 176 home-living PD patients. They underwent a neurological examination and a structured interview for registration of pain characteristics in addition to responding to standardised questionnaires. Pain was reported by 146 (83%) patients. Compared to the general population, the Parkinson’s disease patients experienced significantly more pain as measured by SF-36 Bodily Pain Scale. The average pain during the last 24 h measured by the Brief Pain Inventory was 2.85. Fifty-three percent of the patients reported one, 24% reported two and 5% reported three pain types. Musculoskeletal pain was reported by 70%, dystonic pain by 40%, radicular-neuropathic pain by 20% and central neuropathic pain by 10%. Thirty-four percent were on analgesic medication. Pain was not associated with age, disease duration or severity of the disease; female gender was the only significant predictor of pain. Pain is frequent and disabling, independent of demographic and clinical variables except for female gender, and is significantly more common in Parkinson’s patients compared to the general population. A minority of the Parkinson’s disease patients with pain received analgesic medication. The findings call for improved attention to assessment and treatment of pain in the follow-up of Parkinson’s disease patients.

414 citations

Related Papers (5)