Penalty Function Methods for Constrained Optimization with Genetic Algorithms
01 Apr 2005-Mathematical & Computational Applications (Association for Scientific Research)-Vol. 10, Iss: 1, pp 45-56
TL;DR: These penalty-based methods for handling constraints in Genetic Algorithms are presented and discussed and their strengths and weaknesses are discussed.
Abstract: Genetic Algorithms are most directly suited to unconstrained optimization. Application of Genetic Algorithms to constrained optimization problems is often a challenging effort. Several methods have been proposed for handling constraints. The most common method in Genetic Algorithms to handle constraints is to use penalty functions. In this paper, we present these penalty-based methods and discuss their strengths and weaknesses.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: This paper proposes an efficient simulated annealing algorithm (SA) to solve the redundancy allocation problem (RAP) and its performance is compared with well-known algorithms in the literature for different test problems.
71 citations
TL;DR: The experimental results show that the proposed ASNPSO algorithm is very effective and efficient in searching for multiple optimal solutions for benchmark test functions without any prior knowledge.
70 citations
TL;DR: A new multi-objective facility-location problem within the batch arrival queuing framework is proposed and two meta-heuristic algorithms, namely genetic algorithm (GA) and simulated annealing (SA) are proposed to solve the model.
Abstract: Many research works in mathematical modeling of the facility location problem have been carried out in discrete and continuous optimization area to obtain the optimum number of required facilities along with the relevant allocation processes. This paper proposes a new multi-objective facility-location problem within the batch arrival queuing framework. Three objective functions are considered: (I) minimizing the weighted sum of the waiting and the traveling times, (II) minimizing the maximum idle time pertinent to each facility, and (III) minimizing the total cost associated with the opened facilities. In this way, the best combination of the facilities is determined in the sense of economical, equilibrium, and enhancing service quality viewpoints. As the model is shown strongly NP-hard, two meta-heuristic algorithms, namely genetic algorithm (GA) and simulated annealing (SA) are proposed to solve the model. Not only new coding is developed in these solution algorithms, but also a random search algorithm is proposed to justify the efficiency of both algorithms. Since the solution-quality of all meta-heuristic algorithms severely depends on their parameters, design of experiments and response surface methodologies have been utilized to calibrate the parameters of both algorithms. Finally, computational results obtained by implementing both algorithms on several problems of different sizes demonstrate the performances of the proposed methodology.
67 citations
Abstract: The application of facility location problems in choosing the best location of relief distribution centers plays a salient role in emergency operations of large-scale disasters. On the premise that the service recipients are uniformly distributed along the network edges, this study investigates a combined mobile and immobile pre-earthquake facility location problem. A predefined number of locations are to be selected among a set of potential locations. Each facility is used in the relief distribution operation. It is incontrovertible that due to earthquakes, some network edges collapse and corresponding areas may lose their accessibility. Thus in this study, it is assumed that people on intact and accessible edges travel to the location of the distribution centers to receive the relief. For those who are located on collapsed or inaccessible network edges, the medium-scale unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) helicopters are utilized in the relief distribution operation. This study aims to develop a mathematical model which minimizes the aggregate traveling time for both people and UAVs over a set of feasible scenarios. Since the network problems are NP-hard, some metaheuristic algorithms are developed to solve the proposed model. In order to demonstrate the applicability of developed model, a case study based on feasible earthquake scenarios in Tehran is presented.
66 citations
Cites methods from "Penalty Function Methods for Constr..."
...The penalty function is a rampant method which is applied to handle the infeasible solutions (Yeniay 2005)....
[...]
TL;DR: A dynamic robust location–allocation model is presented for designing a blood supply chain network under facility disruption risks and uncertainty in a disaster situation and two meta-heuristic algorithms are presented to solve the model.
63 citations
References
More filters
Book•
01 Sep 1988
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the computer techniques, mathematical tools, and research results that will enable both students and practitioners to apply genetic algorithms to problems in many fields, including computer programming and mathematics.
Abstract: From the Publisher:
This book brings together - in an informal and tutorial fashion - the computer techniques, mathematical tools, and research results that will enable both students and practitioners to apply genetic algorithms to problems in many fields
Major concepts are illustrated with running examples, and major algorithms are illustrated by Pascal computer programs No prior knowledge of GAs or genetics is assumed, and only a minimum of computer programming and mathematics background is required
52,797 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1992
TL;DR: GAs and Evolution Programs for Various Discrete Problems, a Hierarchy of Evolution Programs and Heuristics, and Conclusions.
Abstract: 1 GAs: What Are They?.- 2 GAs: How Do They Work?.- 3 GAs: Why Do They Work?.- 4 GAs: Selected Topics.- 5 Binary or Float?.- 6 Fine Local Tuning.- 7 Handling Constraints.- 8 Evolution Strategies and Other Methods.- 9 The Transportation Problem.- 10 The Traveling Salesman Problem.- 11 Evolution Programs for Various Discrete Problems.- 12 Machine Learning.- 13 Evolutionary Programming and Genetic Programming.- 14 A Hierarchy of Evolution Programs.- 15 Evolution Programs and Heuristics.- 16 Conclusions.- Appendix A.- Appendix B.- Appendix C.- Appendix D.- References.
12,212 citations
Book•
03 Mar 1993
TL;DR: The book is a solid reference for professionals as well as a useful text for students in the fields of operations research, management science, industrial engineering, applied mathematics, and also in engineering disciplines that deal with analytical optimization techniques.
Abstract: COMPREHENSIVE COVERAGE OF NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING THEORY AND ALGORITHMS, THOROUGHLY REVISED AND EXPANDED"Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms"--now in an extensively updated Third Edition--addresses the problem of optimizing an objective function in the presence of equality and inequality constraints. Many realistic problems cannot be adequately represented as a linear program owing to the nature of the nonlinearity of the objective function and/or the nonlinearity of any constraints. The "Third Edition" begins with a general introduction to nonlinear programming with illustrative examples and guidelines for model construction.Concentration on the three major parts of nonlinear programming is provided: Convex analysis with discussion of topological properties of convex sets, separation and support of convex sets, polyhedral sets, extreme points and extreme directions of polyhedral sets, and linear programmingOptimality conditions and duality with coverage of the nature, interpretation, and value of the classical Fritz John (FJ) and the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions; the interrelationships between various proposed constraint qualifications; and Lagrangian duality and saddle point optimality conditionsAlgorithms and their convergence, with a presentation of algorithms for solving both unconstrained and constrained nonlinear programming problemsImportant features of the "Third Edition" include: New topics such as second interior point methods, nonconvex optimization, nondifferentiable optimization, and moreUpdated discussion and new applications in each chapterDetailed numerical examples and graphical illustrationsEssential coverage of modeling and formulating nonlinear programsSimple numerical problemsAdvanced theoretical exercisesThe book is a solid reference for professionals as well as a useful text for students in the fields of operations research, management science, industrial engineering, applied mathematics, and also in engineering disciplines that deal with analytical optimization techniques. The logical and self-contained format uniquely covers nonlinear programming techniques with a great depth of information and an abundance of valuable examples and illustrations that showcase the most current advances in nonlinear problems.
6,259 citations
TL;DR: GA's population-based approach and ability to make pair-wise comparison in tournament selection operator are exploited to devise a penalty function approach that does not require any penalty parameter to guide the search towards the constrained optimum.
3,495 citations
"Penalty Function Methods for Constr..." refers background in this paper
...These approaches can be grouped in four major categories [28]: Category 1: Methods based on penalty functions - Death Penalty [2] - Static Penalties [15,20] - Dynamic Penalties [16,17] - Annealing Penalties [5,24] - Adaptive Penalties [10,12,35,37] - Segregated GA [21] - Co-evolutionary Penalties [8] Category 2: Methods based on a search of feasible solutions - Repairing unfeasible individuals [27] - Superiority of feasible points [9,32] - Behavioral memory [34]...
[...]
Book•
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: In this work, the author compares the three most prominent representatives of evolutionary algorithms: genetic algorithms, evolution strategies, and evolutionary programming within a unified framework, thereby clarifying the similarities and differences of these methods.
2,679 citations