scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Engagement: Based on the Research of Organizational Identification and Organizational Justice

02 Dec 2016-Open Journal of Social Sciences (Scientific Research Publishing)-Vol. 04, Iss: 12, pp 46-57
TL;DR: In this paper, a relationship model of perceived organizational support, organizational identification, employee engagement, and organizational justice was constructed. But the authors did not consider the effect of organizational identification on employee engagement.
Abstract: On the basis of theoretical research, this paper constructs the relationship model of perceived organizational support, organizational identification, employee engagement and organizational justice. With questionnaires from 350 employees in 28 provinces, we empirically tested that the organizational identification plays a mediating role and organizational justice has a moderating effect by using the correlation analysis and structural equation model and regression analysis. The results show that: firstly, perceived organizational support and employee engagement have significantly positive correlation, perceived organizational support applies directly positive influence on employee engagement; secondly, perceived organizational support can also play a role in employee engagement through organizational identification, in other words, organizational identification has partial mediating effect between perceived organizational support and employee engagement; thirdly, this paper verified that organizational justice plays a moderating role on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational identification.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2016, 4, 46-57
http://www.scirp.org/journal/jss
ISSN Online: 2327-5960
ISSN Print: 2327-5952
DOI: 10.4236/jss.2016.412005
December 22, 2016
Perceived Organizational Support and
Employee Engagement: Based on the Research
of Organizational Identification and
Organizational Justice
Kailiang Dai
1*
, Xinyu Qin
2
1
School of Business Administration, South China University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China
2
College of Continuing Education College, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
On the basis of theoretical research,
this paper constructs the relationship model of
perceived organizational support, organizational identification, employee engage
ment
and organizational justice. With questionnaires from 350 employees in 28 provinces,
we empirically tested that the organizational identification plays a mediating role and
organizational justice has a moderating effect by using the correlation analysis and
structural equation model and regression analysis. The results show that: firstly, pe
r-
ceived organizational support and employee engagement have signific
antly positive
correlation, perceived organizational
support applies directly positive influence on
employee engagement; s
econdly, perceived organizational support can also play a
role in employee engagement through organizational identification, in other words,
organizational identification has partial mediating effect between perceived organ
i-
zational support and employee engagement; thirdly, this paper verified that organ
i-
zational justice plays a moderating role on the relationship between perceived org
a-
nizational support and organizational identification.
Keywords
Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Identification, Employee
Engagement, Organizational Justice
1. Introduction
The formal CEO of GM once said, any company who wants to win in the fierce compe-
tition must try to make their own employees dedicated. It can be known that employee
How to cite this paper:
Dai, K.L. and Qin,
X
.Y. (2016) Perceived Organizational Sup-
port
and
Employee Engagement: Based on
the Research of Organizational Identific
a-
tion and Organizational Justice
.
Open Jou
r-
nal of Social Sciences
,
4
, 46-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.
4236/jss.2016.412005
Received:
November 21, 2016
Accepted:
December 19, 2016
Published:
December 22, 2016
Copyright © 201
6 by authors and
Scientific
Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International
L
icense (CC BY 4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Open Access

K. L. Dai, X. Y. Qin
47
engagement has a significant positive impact on the organizations benefit and long-
term development. The latest research report released by the well-known Gallup con-
sulting firm showed that there are only 13% of the total staff in the world can be re-
garded as dedicated, and the proportion of employees in the work of the problem is as
high as 63%. Compared to the world average level, the proportion of dedicated em-
ployees in China is only 6% which makes Chinese enterprises feel anxious. It can be
seen that Chinas enterprises who want to obtain a sustainable competitive advantage in
the increasingly competitive market environment are required to improve their em-
ployee engagement urgently. So, what can domestic enterprises do to improve em-
ployee engagement? Chen Anqi [1] found that employees organizational identification
and employee engagement are positively correlated through the questionnaire survey of
new employees in financial industry from four different cities. In addition, Sun Jianmin
and Wang Zhen [2] analyzed 122 employees of 601 companies in domestic and found
that organizational support can predict the role of organizational identification effec-
tively. By empirical research, Gao Jianli [3] put forward that enterprises who pay atten-
tion to the correspondence between employees psychological capital and organizational
can have a significant effect to improve employee engagement. In addition, Usmani and
Jamal think that organizational justice has a significant effect on the employees’ job be-
haviors and their work attitudes that ultimately result in a positive if confirmed or,
otherwise negative organizational outcome [4]. Hence, such notion has great and sig-
nificant implication for the individuals and the organizations as a whole [5]. It can be
seen that the relationship among employees organizational support, organizational
identification, employee engagement and organization justice has been paid more and
more attention by experts and scholars, meanwhile many valuable results have been
achieved. However, the research on the internal mechanism of how organizational
support affects employee engagement is to be deepened. Specifically, what is the inter-
nal mechanism of perceived organizational support and employee engagement? In or-
der to answer these above questions, this paper will mainly focus on discussing the fol-
lowing three aspects: the influence of organizational support on employee engagement,
2) the mediating effect of organizational identification on organizational support and
engagement, 3) to explore the regulatory role of organizational justice in the model of
this study. And then we use psychological contract theory, social exchange theory and
social equity theory and so on to explain those questions above.
2. Literature Review and Research Hypothesis
2.1. The Relationship between Organizational Support and
Organizational Identification
Perceived Organizational Support (POS) was first put forward by Professor Eisenberg-
er, he defined this concept as the degree to which employees believe that their organiza-
tion values their contributions and cares about their well-being and fulfills socioemo-
tional needs.
According to social identity theory (SIT), an organization may provide a basis for

K. L. Dai, X. Y. Qin
48
employeesself-construals, notably if it is perceived as prestigious or distinctive [6].
Organizational identification is thus a specific form of social identification and may be
defined as employeescognitive self-awareness of organizational membership [7]. Re-
search has shown employees may identify to several targets including their work group,
their department or their organization as a whole [8]. Identification will, in turn, im-
pact employees’ commitment [9].
According to the hierarchy of needs theory put forward by Masilous, everyone needs
to be taken care of. Emotional need is more detailed than the physical need. Bishop and
Goldsby’s research shows that if the emotional support, financial support or the career
development support were perceived by the employee, their sense of belonging would
be satisfied and thus their emotional attachment to the organization be strengthened.
Organization support prompts employees to perceive their own value and the affirma-
tion of the informal status, thereby enhancing the perception of organizational attrac-
tiveness. Because this process gives individuals a more positive social identity, as a re-
sult individuals are more likely to produce a sense of identity to those organizations
that are able to give them a positive trait [10]. This is consistent with what David and
Malayka concluded through the empirical study of the companys employees that em-
ployees perceived support from the organization has significantly positive impact on
organizational identification [11]. Based on the above analysis, the following assump-
tions are put forward:
H1: Perceived organizational support is positively correlated with organizational iden-
tification.
2.2. The Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and
Employee Engagement
Employee engagement is a property of the relationship between an organization and its
employees. An engaged employeeis defined as one who is fully absorbed by and en-
thusiastic about their work and so takes positive action to further the organizations
reputation and interests. Perceived organizational support reflects the organizations
overall expectations of its members and recognition of personal value and their contri-
bution to it in a subjective perception way. Social exchange theoryand reciprocity
principlehave always been the theoretical basis of research on organizational support
and employee engagement. The premise of the social exchange relationship is that if a
person gives another person a favor, he believes that he will receive a corresponding
return from the other person in the future [12]. Similarly, if organizational support was
perceived by the employees, then they will believe that the organization will fulfill its
obligations of exchange in the future and think that they are obligated to repay the or-
ganization, so they will work hard in order to obtain the material and spiritual rewards,
thus realize social exchange. According to the principle of reciprocity, only when em-
ployees perceive support and caring from the organization that they will give positive
organizational commitment and contribution and make active attitude or behavior
changes in order to make effort to achieve organization goals. Related research shows
that organizational support has a direct positive predictive effect on knowledge work-

K. L. Dai, X. Y. Qin
49
ers’ job involvement [13]. The research on the negative behavior of the job involvement
conducted by Wayne found that perceived organizational support can significantly in-
hibit the negative behavior of employees [14]. Based on the above analysis, the follow-
ing assumptions are put forward:
H2: Perceived organizational support is positively correlated with employee engage-
ment.
2.3. The Relationship between Organizational Identification and
Employee Engagement
Organizational identification is particularly important for the development of the or-
ganization, for it has a certain degree of causality with the employee engagement. Em-
ployees with high organizational identification will be actively involved into the work
with actively attitude and behavior, for instance, the consistency of personal goals and
organizational goals, to take initiative to remove the personal behavior that does not
conform to the values of the organization, etc. Specifically, employees with high orga-
nizational identification will be more concerned with the organizations norms and
values when they making decisions and be able to work diligently in accordance with
the objectives and requirements of the organization without the supervision of others.
Related organizational behavior research confirmed that organizational identification is
significantly positive correlation with those indicators that help to achieve organiza-
tional goals such as employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, em-
ployee performance and so forth. Ashforth and Mael believe that the level of organiza-
tional identification plays a decisive role in the employees’ work motivation and beha-
vior [15]. The employees with high organizational identification tend to show a high
level of support and a higher level of commitment to the organization, and their deci-
sion making is more consistent with the goals of the organization. Based on the above
analysis, the following assumptions are put forward:
H3: Organizational identification is positively correlated with employee engagement.
2.4. The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification
On the basis of social identity theory, organizational identity is the psychological link
connecting members and organizations, it is a process of members defined themselves
and in the psychological belonging to the organization, in addition, organizational
support is an important source of the organization identification [16]. Self presentation
theory believes that the high level of organizational support can make the organization
members feel content with what the organization provide to them, and then lead to the
increase of the sense of identity of the organization. So they will work harder to prove
their worth to the organization and worth the organization to provide more support,
the results show a higher degree of employee engagement [17]. In addition, the organi-
zational support theory shows that if employees perceived that the organization con-
cerned with their welfare and value their contribution, employees will consciously join
the membership of the organization to self-identity, so are more willing to immerse

K. L. Dai, X. Y. Qin
50
themselves in the role of the organization, to spare no effort to do their work and in-
crease their self-expression performance in the work. As a result, a higher level of en-
gagement reflected in them [18]. Based on the above analysis, the following assump-
tions are put forward:
H4: Organizational identification plays an intermediary role in the process of orga-
nizational support and employee engagement.
2.5. The Moderating Effect of Organizational Justice
Fairness issue has always been the eternal theme of the organizational. Researchers hold
that if employees believe they are treated fairly, they would have a positive attitude to-
wards their work, work results and superiors. In addition, according to the group value
model, employees will regard organizational justice as their social information position
in the organization. If the perceived organizational justice degree is high, then the em-
ployees will hold that the organization pays attention to the contribution of each mem-
ber and trust them fully, and thus enhance staffs trust to organization. The trust to the
organization will strengthen the members sense of belonging and the ties between the
two sides, so that employees will have a higher degree of organizational identification
[19]. To some extent, organizational support transfers employees the expectations from
the organization and provide necessary conditions to complete this expectation, orga-
nizational justice is the institutional basis that can guarantee the employees to complete
the expectations from the organization. It is the interaction between organizational sup-
port and organizational justice that influences the identification of employees. Based on
the above analysis, the following assumptions are put forward:
H5: 0rganizational justice plays a moderating role on the relationship between per-
ceived organizational support and organizational identification as shown in
Figure 1.
3. Research Design
3.1. Samples
In this study, a systematic sampling and stratified sampling are used to ensure the sam-
ples are representative. 350 respondents in a total of 52 companies are from different
provinces and regions in China. In this survey, 350 questionnaires were sent out, 301
were recovered, the number of the effective questionnaires was 261, the effective rate
Figure 1. Research model.
perceivedorganizational support
organizational
identification
employee engagement
organizational justice

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on hypotheses involving social exchange, attribution, and self-enhancement, this paper carried out a meta-analytic assessment of OST using results from 558 studies and found that OST was generally successful in its predictions concerning both the antecedents of POS (leadership, employee-organization context, human resource practices, and working conditions) and its consequences (employee orientation toward the organization and work, employee performance, and well-being).

1,138 citations


Cites background from "Perceived Organizational Support an..."

  • ...…well-being According to organizational support theory (OST; Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchison, & Sowa, 1986; Eisenberger & Stinglhamber, 2011; Shore & Shore, 1995), employees develop a general perception concerning the extent to which the organization values their contributions and cares…...

    [...]

  • ...Employees with high POS should be more assured that the organization will not take advantage of their vulnerabilities (Eisenberger et al., 1990; Shore & Shore, 1995)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a relational chain leading from supervisors' perceptions of support by the organization (supervisor POS) to the formation of high-quality LMX relationships with their subordinates (first link), who interpret high quality LMX as support from the organization and, ultimately, repay the organization with increased dedication and effort (examined here in terms of reduced withdrawal behavior).
Abstract: Summary We present three studies providing an increased understanding of the interdependence between perceived organizational support (POS) and leader–member exchange (LMX). Using employees from a social service agency and new hires from a variety of organizations, we report evidence for a relational chain leading from supervisors' perceptions of support by the organization (supervisor POS) to the formation of high-quality LMX relationships with their subordinates (first link), who interpret high-quality LMX as support from the organization (subordinate POS, second link) and, ultimately, repay the organization with increased dedication and effort (examined here in terms of reduced withdrawal behavior). The relationship between supervisor POS and LMX with subordinates was strongly moderated by supervisor fear of exploitation in exchange relationships (reciprocation wariness), holding only for supervisors with low reciprocation wariness. Consistent with the view that employees perceive the organization as partly responsible for treatment received from supervisors, LMX was found to be more strongly related to POS when employees highly identified their supervisors with the organization (supervisor's organizational embodiment), and this interaction extended to reduced withdrawal behavior. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

144 citations


Cites background from "Perceived Organizational Support an..."

  • ...By comparison, organizational support theory (Eisenberger & Stinglhamber, 2011; Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002; Shore & Shore, 1995) considers subordinates’ and supervisors’ favorable relationships with the organization....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Li et al. as discussed by the authors examined whether organizational identification mediates the effect of perceived organizational support on work outcomes including turnover intentions, work performance, and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB).

95 citations


Cites background from "Perceived Organizational Support an..."

  • ...In line with this view, Shore and Shore (1995) also argued that the perception of organizational support provides employees with important information about his/her relationship to the workplace....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that a relatively brief training program can help managers become more supportive and less abusive in the workplace.
Abstract: Although much is known about the antecedents and consequences of abusive supervision, scant attention has been paid to investigating procedures to reduce its frequency. We conducted a quasiexperiment to examine the effects of supervisor support training on subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision and supervisor support. Supervisors (n = 23) in 4 restaurants were trained in 4 supportive supervision strategies (benevolence, sincerity, fairness, and experiential processing) during 4 2-hr sessions over a period of 2 months. We compared perceived supervisor support and abusive supervision before and 9 months after training for 208 employees whose supervisors received support training and 241 employees in 4 similar control restaurants. Compared to employees in the control restaurants, employees whose supervisors received the support training reported higher levels of perceived supervisor support and less abusive supervision. These findings suggest that a relatively brief training program can help managers become more supportive and less abusive. Theoretical and practical implications for effectively managing abusive supervision are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

87 citations


Cites background or methods from "Perceived Organizational Support an..."

  • ...Based on OST (Eisenberger et al., 1986; Eisenberger & Stinglhamber, 2011; Shore & Shore, 1995), which maintains that supportive supervision leads to a general positive perception of the supervisor as an organizational agent, we used supportive supervision as an alternative for supervisors to employ…...

    [...]

  • ...OST (Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchison, & Sowa, 1986; Eisenberger & Stinglhamber, 2011; Shore & Shore, 1995) suggests that employees should respond to the receipt of supportive behaviors with a general perception of positive valuation by their supervisor....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article argued that social identification is a perception of oneness with a group of persons, and social identification stems from the categorization of individuals, the distinctiveness and prestige of the group, the salience of outgroups, and the factors that traditionally are associated with group formation.
Abstract: It is argued that (a) social identification is a perception of oneness with a group of persons; (b) social identification stems from the categorization of individuals, the distinctiveness and prestige of the group, the salience of outgroups, and the factors that traditionally are associated with group formation; and (c) social identification leads to activities that are congruent with the identity, support for institutions that embody the identity, stereotypical perceptions of self and others, and outcomes that traditionally are associated with group formation, and it reinforces the antecedents of identification. This perspective is applied to organizational socialization, role conflict, and intergroup relations.

8,480 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, self-report data from 297 alumni of an all-male religious college indicate that identification with the alma mater was associated with: (1) the hypothesized organizational antecedents of organizational distinctiveness, organizational prestige, and (absence of) intraorganizational competition, but not with interorganization competition, the hypothesized individual antecedent of satisfaction with the organization, tenure as students, and sentimentality, not with recency of attendance, number of schools attended, or the existence of a mentor, and hypothesized outcomes of making financial contributions, willingness to
Abstract: Summary Organizational identification is defined as a perceived oneness with an organization and the experience of the organization's successes and failures as one's own. While identification is considered important to the organization, it has not been clearly operationalized. The current study tests a proposed model of organizational identification. Self-report data from 297 alumni of an all-male religious college indicate that identification with the alma mater was associated with: (1) the hypothesized organizational antecedents of organizational distinctiveness, organizational prestige, and (absence of) intraorganizational competition, but not with interorganizational competition, (2) the hypothesized individual antecedents of satisfaction with the organization, tenure as students, and sentimentality, but not with recency of attendance, number of schools attended, or the existence of a mentor, and (3) the hypothesized outcomes of making financial contributions, willingness to advise one's offspring and others to attend the college, and participating in various school functions. The findings provide direction for academic administrators seeking to increase alumni support, as well as for corporate managers concerned about the loyalty of workers in an era of mergers and takeovers.

4,726 citations


"Perceived Organizational Support an..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...3) The measurement of organizational identification here we adopt Mael’s [20] one dimension scale which consists of 6 items, for instance, the success of my company represents my own success....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, Bergami et al. developed a model to explain how images of one's work organization shape the strength of his or her identification with the organization and how members assess the attractiveness of these images by how well the image preserves the continuity of their self-concept, provides distinctiveness, and enhances self-esteem.
Abstract: We thank Massimo Bergami, Arthur Brief, Mason Carpenter, Brian Golden, Frances Hauge, Rod Kramer, Sharon Lobel, Reuben McDaniel, Debra Meyerson, Wendy Penner, Sandy Piderit, Linda Pike, Mlchael Pratt, Robert Quinn, Anat Rafaeli, Lance Sandelands, Bob Sutton, David Whetten, Batia Wiesenfeld, and three anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this paper. We develop a model to explain how images of one's work organization shape the strength of his or her identification with the organization. We focus on two key organizational images: one based on what a member believes is distinctive, central, and enduring about his or her organization and one based on a member's beliefs about what outsiders think about the organization. According to the model, members assess the attractiveness of these images by how well the image preserves the continuity of their self-concept, provides distinctiveness, and enhances self-esteem. The model leads to a number of propositions about how organizational identification affects members' patterns of social interaction.'

4,469 citations


"Perceived Organizational Support an..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Because this process gives individuals a more positive social identity, as a result individuals are more likely to produce a sense of identity to those organizations that are able to give them a positive trait [10]....

    [...]

Book
01 Jan 1975

3,687 citations


"Perceived Organizational Support an..." refers background in this paper

  • ...So they will work harder to prove their worth to the organization and worth the organization to provide more support, the results show a higher degree of employee engagement [17]....

    [...]

Book
01 Jan 1978

3,564 citations


"Perceived Organizational Support an..." refers background in this paper

  • ...On the basis of social identity theory, organizational identity is the psychological link connecting members and organizations, it is a process of members defined themselves and in the psychological belonging to the organization, in addition, organizational support is an important source of the organization identification [16]....

    [...]