Performance Evaluation of LTE and Wi-Fi Coexistence in Unlicensed Bands
02 Jun 2013-pp 1-6
TL;DR: A simulator-based system- level analysis in order to assess the network performance in an office scenario shows that LTE system performance is slightly affected by coexistence whereas Wi-Fi is significantly impacted by LTE transmissions.
Abstract: The deployment of modern mobile systems has faced severe challenges due to the current spectrum scarcity. The situation has been further worsened by the development of different wireless technologies and standards that can be used in the same frequency band. Furthermore, the usage of smaller cells (e.g. pico, femto and wireless LAN), coexistence among heterogeneous networks (including amongst different wireless technologies such as LTE and Wi-Fi deployed in the same frequency band) has been a big field of research in the academy and industry. In this paper, we provide a performance evaluation of coexistence between LTE and Wi-Fi systems and show some of the challenges faced by the different technologies. We focus on a simulator-based system- level analysis in order to assess the network performance in an office scenario. Simulation results show that LTE system performance is slightly affected by coexistence whereas Wi-Fi is significantly impacted by LTE transmissions. In coexistence, the Wi-Fi channel is most often blocked by LTE interference, making the Wi-Fi nodes to stay on the LISTEN mode more than 96% of the time. This reflects directly on the Wi-Fi user throughput, that decreases from 70% to ≈100% depending on the scenario. Finally, some of the main issues that limit the LTE/Wi-Fi coexistence and some pointers on the mutual interference management of both the systems are provided.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: In this paper, the potential gains and limitations of network densification and spectral efficiency enhancement techniques in ultra-dense small cell deployments are analyzed. And the top ten challenges to be addressed to bring ultra dense small-cell deployments to reality are discussed.
Abstract: Today's heterogeneous networks comprised of mostly macrocells and indoor small cells will not be able to meet the upcoming traffic demands. Indeed, it is forecasted that at least a $100\times$ network capacity increase will be required to meet the traffic demands in 2020. As a result, vendors and operators are now looking at using every tool at hand to improve network capacity. In this epic campaign, three paradigms are noteworthy, i.e., network densification, the use of higher frequency bands and spectral efficiency enhancement techniques. This paper aims at bringing further common understanding and analysing the potential gains and limitations of these three paradigms, together with the impact of idle mode capabilities at the small cells as well as the user equipment density and distribution in outdoor scenarios. Special attention is paid to network densification and its implications when transiting to ultra-dense small cell deployments. Simulation results show that comparing to the baseline case with an average inter site distance of 200 m and a 100 MHz bandwidth, network densification with an average inter site distance of 35 m can increase the average UE throughput by $7.56\times$ , while the use of the 10 GHz band with a 500 MHz bandwidth can further increase the network capacity up to $5\times$ , resulting in an average of 1.27 Gbps per UE. The use of beamforming with up to 4 antennas per small cell BS lacks behind with average throughput gains around 30% and cell-edge throughput gains of up to $2\times$ . Considering an extreme densification, an average inter site distance of 5 m can increase the average and cell-edge UE throughput by $18\times$ and $48\times$ , respectively. Our study also shows how network densification reduces multi-user diversity, and thus proportional fair alike schedulers start losing their advantages with respect to round robin ones. The energy efficiency of these ultra-dense small cell deployments is also analysed, indicating the benefits of energy harvesting approaches to make these deployments more energy-efficient. Finally, the top ten challenges to be addressed to bring ultra-dense small cell deployments to reality are also discussed.
515 citations
TL;DR: The issues that arise from the concurrent operation of LTE and Wi-Fi in the same unlicensed bands from the point of view of radio resource management are discussed and it is shown that Wi-fi is severely impacted by LTE transmissions.
Abstract: The expansion of wireless broadband access network deployments is resulting in increased scarcity of available radio spectrum. It is very likely that in the near future, cellular technologies and wireless local area networks will need to coexist in the same unlicensed bands. However, the two most prominent technologies, LTE and Wi-Fi, were designed to work in different bands and not to coexist in a shared band. In this article, we discuss the issues that arise from the concurrent operation of LTE and Wi-Fi in the same unlicensed bands from the point of view of radio resource management. We show that Wi-Fi is severely impacted by LTE transmissions; hence, the coexistence of LTE and Wi-Fi needs to be carefully investigated. We discuss some possible coexistence mechanisms and future research directions that may lead to successful joint deployment of LTE and Wi-Fi in the same unlicensed band.
247 citations
Cites background from "Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..."
...D. Vieira, Rafael C. D....
[...]
...Sayantan Choudhury, Esa Tuomaala, and Klaus Doppler are with Nokia Research Center....
[...]
TL;DR: This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the coexistence of LTE-LAA and Wi-Fi on 5 GHz with corresponding deployment scenarios, and explores a relatively smooth technical route for solving coexistence-related problems.
Abstract: Long term evolution (LTE) carrier aggregation with 5 GHz unlicensed national informational infrastructure band has been pointed out by the industry as a good solution to handle the rapidly increasing amounts of data traffic. To provide fair coexistence of LTE-licensed assisted access (LTE-LAA) and Wi-Fi on 5 GHz, several coexistence mechanisms have already been proposed. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the coexistence of LTE-LAA and Wi-Fi on 5 GHz with corresponding deployment scenarios. We first analyze coexistence-related features of those two technologies, including motivation, LTE carrier aggregation with unlicensed band, LTE and Wi-Fi medium access control protocols comparison, coexistence challenges and enablers, performance difference between LTE-LAA and Wi-Fi, as well as co-channel interference. Second, we further extensively discuss current considerations about the coexistence of LTE-LAA and Wi-Fi. Third, influential factors for the classification of small cell scenarios, as well as four representative scenarios are investigated in detail. Then we explore a relatively smooth technical route for solving coexistence-related problems, which practically takes features of a specific scenario as the base for designing deployment mode of LTE-LAA and/or Wi-Fi. A scenario-oriented decision making procedure for the coexistence issue and the analysis on an example deployment scenario, including design and performance evaluation metrics focusing on the concept of the scenario-oriented coexistence are presented. We finally forecast further research trends on the basis of our conclusion.
201 citations
Cites methods from "Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..."
...Another feasible methodology is assisted by ABS [70], [71], [80]....
[...]
TL;DR: This article derives a new adaptive LBT mechanism and and virtualized core network for the best practices in both Wi-Fi and LTE-U technologies to enable coexistence between both technologies using tradeoff performance for fair spectrum sharing.
Abstract: Fifth-generation (5G) network developers need to identify the necessary requirements toward additional capacity and spectrally efficient wireless technologies. Therefore, the significant amount of underutilized spectrum in the Wi-Fi band is motivating operators to combine long-term evolution (LTE) with Wi-Fi technologies. This new LTE in unlicensed band (LTE-U) has the physical layer topology to access Wi-Fi spectrum, specifically the 5-GHz band. Nevertheless, the evolution of LTE-U affects the Wi-Fi operations due to the absence of any regularity for LTE-U transmissions in unlicensed band. In this article, we address the challenges for Wi-Fi to maintain transmissions under the umbrella of LTE-U as Wi-Fi is pushed offline because of the listen-before-talk (LBT) feature. Therefore, we derive a new adaptive LBT mechanism and and virtualized core network for the best practices in both Wi-Fi and LTE-U technologies. The proposed solutions include noncoordinated and coordinated network managements to enable coexistence between both technologies using tradeoff performance for fair spectrum sharing. We concentrate on the initial coexistent technique and discuss how it maps to higher-layer improvements. This article shows new approaches to achieve the Third-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release 13.
195 citations
Cites background from "Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..."
..., by Nokia) show that LTE performance is nearly unchanged in the presence of Wi-Fi use of the same band (less than 4% in most cases), while Wi-Fi performance degrades significantly in the presence of LTE (70% in sparse deployment and over 90% in dense deployment) [9]....
[...]
TL;DR: This paper evaluates the relevant PHY and MAC techniques for their ability to improve the reliability and reduce the latency and identifies that enabling long-term evolution to coexist in the unlicensed spectrum is also a potential enabler of URLLC in theUnlicensed band.
Abstract: Future 5th generation networks are expected to enable three key services—enhanced mobile broadband, massive machine type communications and ultra-reliable and low latency communications (URLLC). As per the 3rd generation partnership project URLLC requirements, it is expected that the reliability of one transmission of a 32 byte packet will be at least 99.999% and the latency will be at most 1 ms. This unprecedented level of reliability and latency will yield various new applications, such as smart grids, industrial automation and intelligent transport systems. In this survey we present potential future URLLC applications, and summarize the corresponding reliability and latency requirements. We provide a comprehensive discussion on physical (PHY) and medium access control (MAC) layer techniques that enable URLLC, addressing both licensed and unlicensed bands. This paper evaluates the relevant PHY and MAC techniques for their ability to improve the reliability and reduce the latency. We identify that enabling long-term evolution to coexist in the unlicensed spectrum is also a potential enabler of URLLC in the unlicensed band, and provide numerical evaluations. Lastly, this paper discusses the potential future research directions and challenges in achieving the URLLC requirements.
185 citations
Additional excerpts
...the time [228]....
[...]
References
More filters
TL;DR: An overview of the techniques being considered for LTE Release 10 (aka LTEAdvanced) is discussed, which includes bandwidth extension via carrier aggregation to support deployment bandwidths up to 100 MHz, downlink spatial multiplexing including single-cell multi-user multiple-input multiple-output transmission and coordinated multi point transmission, and heterogeneous networks with emphasis on Type 1 and Type 2 relays.
Abstract: LTE Release 8 is one of the primary broadband technologies based on OFDM, which is currently being commercialized. LTE Release 8, which is mainly deployed in a macro/microcell layout, provides improved system capacity and coverage, high peak data rates, low latency, reduced operating costs, multi-antenna support, flexible bandwidth operation and seamless integration with existing systems. LTE-Advanced (also known as LTE Release 10) significantly enhances the existing LTE Release 8 and supports much higher peak rates, higher throughput and coverage, and lower latencies, resulting in a better user experience. Additionally, LTE Release 10 will support heterogeneous deployments where low-power nodes comprising picocells, femtocells, relays, remote radio heads, and so on are placed in a macrocell layout. The LTE-Advanced features enable one to meet or exceed IMT-Advanced requirements. It may also be noted that LTE Release 9 provides some minor enhancement to LTE Release 8 with respect to the air interface, and includes features like dual-layer beamforming and time-difference- of-arrival-based location techniques. In this article an overview of the techniques being considered for LTE Release 10 (aka LTEAdvanced) is discussed. This includes bandwidth extension via carrier aggregation to support deployment bandwidths up to 100 MHz, downlink spatial multiplexing including single-cell multi-user multiple-input multiple-output transmission and coordinated multi point transmission, uplink spatial multiplexing including extension to four-layer MIMO, and heterogeneous networks with emphasis on Type 1 and Type 2 relays. Finally, the performance of LTEAdvanced using IMT-A scenarios is presented and compared against IMT-A targets for full buffer and bursty traffic model.
1,044 citations
"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers background in this paper
...4GHz band has already been established [7], and the recent inclusion of features on LTE standard [12] are promoting its usage on pico and femto cells, it is possible that in the near future coexistence between LTE (-ADV) and Wi-Fi will become important....
[...]
TL;DR: Concepts underlying the "property" and "commons" debate are presented, options for spectrum reform are clarified, and the trade-offs of spectrum sharing are described.
Abstract: Many complain about severe spectrum shortage. The shortage comes from outdated spectrum policies that allows for little sharing. Regulators have granted licenses that offer exclusive access to the spectrum. When these licensees are not transmitting, the spectrum sits idle. A new technology regarding spectrum shortage enables more spectrum sharing that unleashes innovative products and services, provided that we adopt the appropriate spectrum policies. Two camps are pushing for extreme reform, one for "property rights" and the other for "spectrum commons". This article presents concepts underlying the "property" and "commons" debate, clarifies options for spectrum reform, and describes the trade-offs of spectrum sharing
592 citations
"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers background in this paper
...One of the most promising techniques for dealing with the lack of available spectrum is the concept of spectrum sharing [1] ....
[...]
22 Apr 2007
TL;DR: An adjusted Shannon capacity formula is introduced, where it is shown that the bandwidth efficiency can be calculated based on system parameters, while the SNR efficiency is extracted from detailed link level studies.
Abstract: In this paper we propose a modification to Shannon capacity bound in order to facilitate accurate benchmarking of UTRAN long term evolution (LTE). The method is generally applicable to wireless communication systems, while we have used LTE air-interface technology as a case study. We introduce an adjusted Shannon capacity formula, where we take into account the system bandwidth efficiency and the SNR efficiency of LTE. Separating these issues, allows for simplified parameter extraction. We show that the bandwidth efficiency can be calculated based on system parameters, while the SNR efficiency is extracted from detailed link level studies including advanced features of MIMO and frequency domain packet scheduling (FDPS). We then use the adjusted Shannon capacity formula combined with G-factor distributions for macro and micro cell scenarios to predict LTE cell spectral efficiency (SE). Such LTE SE predictions are compared to LTE cell SE results generated by system level simulations. The results show an excellent match of less that 5-10% deviation.
580 citations
"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers methods in this paper
...For physical layer (PHY) abstraction, Shannon-fitting [14] is employed to predict the PHY performance at the system-level....
[...]
09 Jun 2013
TL;DR: This paper considers two of the most prominent wireless technologies available today, namely Long Term Evolution (LTE), and WiFi, and addresses some problems that arise from their coexistence in the same band, and proposes a simple coexistence scheme that reuses the concept of almost blank subframes in LTE.
Abstract: The recent development of regulatory policies that permit the use of TV bands spectrum on a secondary basis has motivated discussion about coexistence of primary (e.g. TV broadcasts) and secondary users (e.g. WiFi users in TV spectrum). However, much less attention has been given to coexistence of different secondary wireless technologies in the TV white spaces. Lack of coordination between secondary networks may create severe interference situations, resulting in less efficient usage of the spectrum. In this paper, we consider two of the most prominent wireless technologies available today, namely Long Term Evolution (LTE), and WiFi, and address some problems that arise from their coexistence in the same band. We perform exhaustive system simulations and observe that WiFi is hampered much more significantly than LTE in coexistence scenarios. A simple coexistence scheme that reuses the concept of almost blank subframes in LTE is proposed, and it is observed that it can improve the WiFi throughput per user up to 50 times in the studied scenarios.
324 citations
"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers background in this paper
...This kind of approach has started to be investigated in [16], where LTE/Wi-Fi coexistence is enabled by LTE blank subframe allocation....
[...]
27 Aug 2007
TL;DR: A channel hopping design is prototype using PRISM NICs, and it is found that it can sustain throughput at levels of RF interference well above that needed to disrupt unmodified links, and at a reasonable cost in terms of switching overheads.
Abstract: We study the impact on 802.11 networks of RF interference from devices such as Zigbee and cordless phones that increasingly crowd the 2.4GHz ISM band, and from devices such as wireless camera jammers and non-compliant 802.11 devices that seek to disrupt 802.11 operation. Our experiments show that commodity 802.11 equipment is surprisingly vulnerable to certain patterns of weak or narrow-band interference. This enables us to disrupt a link with an interfering signal whose power is 1000 times weaker than the victim's 802.11 signals, or to shut down a multiple AP, multiple channel managed network at a location with a single radio interferer. We identify several factors that lead to these vulnerabilities, ranging from MAC layer driver implementation strategies to PHY layer radio frequency implementation strategies. Our results further show that these factors are not overcome by simply changing 802.11 operational parameters (such as CCA threshold, rate and packet size) with the exception of frequency shifts. This leads us to explore rapid channel hopping as a strategy to withstand RF interference. We prototype a channel hopping design using PRISM NICs, and find that it can sustain throughput at levels of RF interference well above that needed to disrupt unmodified links, and at a reasonable cost in terms of switching overheads.
300 citations
"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers background in this paper
...However, it is observed that the coexistence of heterogeneous systems in the same frequency bands causes a meaningful degradation on the system performance (e.g., Wi-Fi and Bluetooth [3], Wi-Fi and ZigBee [4], Wi-Fi and WiMAX [5])....
[...]
..., Wi-Fi and Bluetooth [3], Wi-Fi and ZigBee [4], Wi-Fi and WiMAX [5])....
[...]