scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Performance Evaluation of LTE and Wi-Fi Coexistence in Unlicensed Bands

TL;DR: A simulator-based system- level analysis in order to assess the network performance in an office scenario shows that LTE system performance is slightly affected by coexistence whereas Wi-Fi is significantly impacted by LTE transmissions.
Abstract: The deployment of modern mobile systems has faced severe challenges due to the current spectrum scarcity. The situation has been further worsened by the development of different wireless technologies and standards that can be used in the same frequency band. Furthermore, the usage of smaller cells (e.g. pico, femto and wireless LAN), coexistence among heterogeneous networks (including amongst different wireless technologies such as LTE and Wi-Fi deployed in the same frequency band) has been a big field of research in the academy and industry. In this paper, we provide a performance evaluation of coexistence between LTE and Wi-Fi systems and show some of the challenges faced by the different technologies. We focus on a simulator-based system- level analysis in order to assess the network performance in an office scenario. Simulation results show that LTE system performance is slightly affected by coexistence whereas Wi-Fi is significantly impacted by LTE transmissions. In coexistence, the Wi-Fi channel is most often blocked by LTE interference, making the Wi-Fi nodes to stay on the LISTEN mode more than 96% of the time. This reflects directly on the Wi-Fi user throughput, that decreases from 70% to ≈100% depending on the scenario. Finally, some of the main issues that limit the LTE/Wi-Fi coexistence and some pointers on the mutual interference management of both the systems are provided.
Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2016
TL;DR: This paper presents the system performance analysis of MAC for LTE and a comparative study toWi-Fi, showing a better efficiency of channel access of Wi-Fi under high competition.
Abstract: The considerable amount of underutilized spectrum in the unlicensed band has motivated 3GPP to study the introduction of LTE in the ISM band to fulfill its increasing demand for extra bandwidth. This will make LTE and Wi-Fi the main opponents in the ISM band. This paper presents the system performance analysis of MAC for LTE and a comparative study to Wi-Fi. Extensive MAC systems simulations are performed under various scenarios and with different parameters. The results show a better efficiency of channel access of Wi-Fi under high competition. Performance of LBT-based LTE MAC is dramatically affected by changing parameters while the performance of Wi-Fi MAC is sustained.

4 citations


Cites background from "Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..."

  • ...In [6] the authors evaluate the performance of the coexistence of Wi-Fi and LTE without LBT in unlicensed band, focusing on the fairness of the channel access....

    [...]

Proceedings ArticleDOI
08 Jun 2015
TL;DR: This paper addresses the problem of narrowband interference (NBI) in SC-FDMA systems by using tools from compressed sensing and stochastic geometry and depicts suitability of the proposed recovery method for NBI mitigation.
Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of narrowband interference (NBI) in SC-FDMA systems by using tools from compressed sensing and stochastic geometry. The proposed NBI cancellation scheme exploits the frequency domain sparsity of the unknown signal and adopts a Bayesian sparse recovery procedure. This is done by keeping a few randomly chosen sub-carriers data free to sense the NBI signal at the receiver. As Bayesian recovery requires knowledge of some NBI parameters (i.e., mean, variance and sparsity rate), we use tools from stochastic geometry to obtain analytical expressions for the required parameters. Our simulation results validate the analysis and depict suitability of the proposed recovery method for NBI mitigation.

4 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
25 May 2020
TL;DR: An interference control method for LTE-LAA using Q-learning, which is one of the reinforcement learning techniques, and the number of ACKs and that of NACKs in HARQ (Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request) are used as reward.
Abstract: LTE-LAA (LTE-Licensed Assisted Access) is the LTE (Long Term Evolution) to use an unlicensed band. However, in addition to the currently used license band, to use the unlicensed band, interference control with Wi-Fi that also uses the unlicensed bandwidth is required. A technique called LBT (Listen Before Talk) is considered as a technique of LTE-LAA interference control. However, since the channel occupation time (TXOP) of LTE-LAA is larger than that of Wi-Fi, there is a problem that Wi-Fi channel access is hindered. As a solution to this problem, one way is to increase the chances of channel access to Wi-Fi by establishing a waiting time of T mute in LTE-LAA to reduce TXOP of LTE-LAA and postpone transmission. In this paper we propose an interference control method for LTE-LAA using Q-learning, which is one of the reinforcement learning techniques. In the proposed method, we select TXOP and T mute using Q-learning. In the proposed method, the number of ACKs and that of NACKs in HARQ (Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request) are used as reward. In LTE-A the user terminal generates ACK / NACK according to the received radio frame and transmits it to the BS (base station). BS retransmits according to the number of ACKs / NACKs. Learning values of TXOP, T mute of the LTE-LAA BS can be obtained so as to increase the number of ACKs or NACKs. When the LTE-LAA BS learns to increase the number of ACKs, the throughput of LTE-LAA is controlled to be high and that of Wi-Fi is controlled to be low. On the other hand, when the LTE-LAA BS learns to increase the number of NACKs, the throughput of LTE-LAA is controlled to be low and that of Wi-Fi is controlled to be high. Simulation result shows the proposed method using LTE-LAA UE (User Equipment) and Wi-Fi UE.

4 citations


Cites background from "Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..."

  • ...Thus, LTE-LAA BSs (Base Stations) contend with WAPs (Wi-Fi Access Points) over unlicensed channel access [5]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a coexistence mechanism for 5G New Radio on Unlicensed (NR-U) small cells located within buildings to coexist with the IEEE 802.11ad/ay, also termed as Wireless Gigabit (WiGig), is presented.
Abstract: In this paper, we first give an overview of the coexistence of cellular with IEEE 802.11 technologies in the unlicensed bands. We then present a coexistence mechanism for Fifth-Generation (5G) New Radio on Unlicensed (NR-U) small cells located within buildings to coexist with the IEEE 802.11ad/ay, also termed as Wireless Gigabit (WiGig). Small cells are dual-band enabled operating in the 60 GHz unlicensed and 28 GHz licensed millimeter-wave (mmW) bands. We develop an interference avoidance scheme in the time domain to avoid cochannel interference (CCI) between in-building NR-U small cells and WiGig access points (APs). We then derive average capacity, spectral efficiency (SE), and energy efficiency (EE) performance metrics of in-building small cells. Extensive system-level numerical and simulation results and analyses are carried out for a number of variants of NR-U, including NR standalone, NR-U standalone, and NR-U anchored. We also analyze the impact of the spatial reuse of both mmW spectra of multiple NR-U anchored operators with a WiGig operator. It is shown that NR-U anchored provides the best average capacity and EE performances, whereas NR-U standalone provides the best SE performance. Moreover, both vertical spatial reuse intrabuilding level and horizontal spatial reuse interbuilding level of mmW spectra in small cells of an NR-U anchored can improve its SE and EE performances. Finally, we show that by choosing appropriate values of vertical and horizontal spatial reuse factors, the proposed coexistence mechanism can achieve the expected SE and EE requirements for the future Sixth-Generation (6G) mobile networks.

4 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The model utilizes a Markov chain to correctly characterize the behavior of the back-off algorithm of a tagged station in the presence of an interfering source, as well as a Quasi Birth-Death process to model the station’s packet queue behavior, and shows that it can accurately estimate the impact of non-IEEE 802.11 inference on IEEE 802.

4 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of the techniques being considered for LTE Release 10 (aka LTEAdvanced) is discussed, which includes bandwidth extension via carrier aggregation to support deployment bandwidths up to 100 MHz, downlink spatial multiplexing including single-cell multi-user multiple-input multiple-output transmission and coordinated multi point transmission, and heterogeneous networks with emphasis on Type 1 and Type 2 relays.
Abstract: LTE Release 8 is one of the primary broadband technologies based on OFDM, which is currently being commercialized. LTE Release 8, which is mainly deployed in a macro/microcell layout, provides improved system capacity and coverage, high peak data rates, low latency, reduced operating costs, multi-antenna support, flexible bandwidth operation and seamless integration with existing systems. LTE-Advanced (also known as LTE Release 10) significantly enhances the existing LTE Release 8 and supports much higher peak rates, higher throughput and coverage, and lower latencies, resulting in a better user experience. Additionally, LTE Release 10 will support heterogeneous deployments where low-power nodes comprising picocells, femtocells, relays, remote radio heads, and so on are placed in a macrocell layout. The LTE-Advanced features enable one to meet or exceed IMT-Advanced requirements. It may also be noted that LTE Release 9 provides some minor enhancement to LTE Release 8 with respect to the air interface, and includes features like dual-layer beamforming and time-difference- of-arrival-based location techniques. In this article an overview of the techniques being considered for LTE Release 10 (aka LTEAdvanced) is discussed. This includes bandwidth extension via carrier aggregation to support deployment bandwidths up to 100 MHz, downlink spatial multiplexing including single-cell multi-user multiple-input multiple-output transmission and coordinated multi point transmission, uplink spatial multiplexing including extension to four-layer MIMO, and heterogeneous networks with emphasis on Type 1 and Type 2 relays. Finally, the performance of LTEAdvanced using IMT-A scenarios is presented and compared against IMT-A targets for full buffer and bursty traffic model.

1,044 citations


"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers background in this paper

  • ...4GHz band has already been established [7], and the recent inclusion of features on LTE standard [12] are promoting its usage on pico and femto cells, it is possible that in the near future coexistence between LTE (-ADV) and Wi-Fi will become important....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Concepts underlying the "property" and "commons" debate are presented, options for spectrum reform are clarified, and the trade-offs of spectrum sharing are described.
Abstract: Many complain about severe spectrum shortage. The shortage comes from outdated spectrum policies that allows for little sharing. Regulators have granted licenses that offer exclusive access to the spectrum. When these licensees are not transmitting, the spectrum sits idle. A new technology regarding spectrum shortage enables more spectrum sharing that unleashes innovative products and services, provided that we adopt the appropriate spectrum policies. Two camps are pushing for extreme reform, one for "property rights" and the other for "spectrum commons". This article presents concepts underlying the "property" and "commons" debate, clarifies options for spectrum reform, and describes the trade-offs of spectrum sharing

592 citations


"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers background in this paper

  • ...One of the most promising techniques for dealing with the lack of available spectrum is the concept of spectrum sharing [1] ....

    [...]

Proceedings ArticleDOI
22 Apr 2007
TL;DR: An adjusted Shannon capacity formula is introduced, where it is shown that the bandwidth efficiency can be calculated based on system parameters, while the SNR efficiency is extracted from detailed link level studies.
Abstract: In this paper we propose a modification to Shannon capacity bound in order to facilitate accurate benchmarking of UTRAN long term evolution (LTE). The method is generally applicable to wireless communication systems, while we have used LTE air-interface technology as a case study. We introduce an adjusted Shannon capacity formula, where we take into account the system bandwidth efficiency and the SNR efficiency of LTE. Separating these issues, allows for simplified parameter extraction. We show that the bandwidth efficiency can be calculated based on system parameters, while the SNR efficiency is extracted from detailed link level studies including advanced features of MIMO and frequency domain packet scheduling (FDPS). We then use the adjusted Shannon capacity formula combined with G-factor distributions for macro and micro cell scenarios to predict LTE cell spectral efficiency (SE). Such LTE SE predictions are compared to LTE cell SE results generated by system level simulations. The results show an excellent match of less that 5-10% deviation.

580 citations


"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...For physical layer (PHY) abstraction, Shannon-fitting [14] is employed to predict the PHY performance at the system-level....

    [...]

Proceedings ArticleDOI
09 Jun 2013
TL;DR: This paper considers two of the most prominent wireless technologies available today, namely Long Term Evolution (LTE), and WiFi, and addresses some problems that arise from their coexistence in the same band, and proposes a simple coexistence scheme that reuses the concept of almost blank subframes in LTE.
Abstract: The recent development of regulatory policies that permit the use of TV bands spectrum on a secondary basis has motivated discussion about coexistence of primary (e.g. TV broadcasts) and secondary users (e.g. WiFi users in TV spectrum). However, much less attention has been given to coexistence of different secondary wireless technologies in the TV white spaces. Lack of coordination between secondary networks may create severe interference situations, resulting in less efficient usage of the spectrum. In this paper, we consider two of the most prominent wireless technologies available today, namely Long Term Evolution (LTE), and WiFi, and address some problems that arise from their coexistence in the same band. We perform exhaustive system simulations and observe that WiFi is hampered much more significantly than LTE in coexistence scenarios. A simple coexistence scheme that reuses the concept of almost blank subframes in LTE is proposed, and it is observed that it can improve the WiFi throughput per user up to 50 times in the studied scenarios.

324 citations


"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers background in this paper

  • ...This kind of approach has started to be investigated in [16], where LTE/Wi-Fi coexistence is enabled by LTE blank subframe allocation....

    [...]

Proceedings ArticleDOI
27 Aug 2007
TL;DR: A channel hopping design is prototype using PRISM NICs, and it is found that it can sustain throughput at levels of RF interference well above that needed to disrupt unmodified links, and at a reasonable cost in terms of switching overheads.
Abstract: We study the impact on 802.11 networks of RF interference from devices such as Zigbee and cordless phones that increasingly crowd the 2.4GHz ISM band, and from devices such as wireless camera jammers and non-compliant 802.11 devices that seek to disrupt 802.11 operation. Our experiments show that commodity 802.11 equipment is surprisingly vulnerable to certain patterns of weak or narrow-band interference. This enables us to disrupt a link with an interfering signal whose power is 1000 times weaker than the victim's 802.11 signals, or to shut down a multiple AP, multiple channel managed network at a location with a single radio interferer. We identify several factors that lead to these vulnerabilities, ranging from MAC layer driver implementation strategies to PHY layer radio frequency implementation strategies. Our results further show that these factors are not overcome by simply changing 802.11 operational parameters (such as CCA threshold, rate and packet size) with the exception of frequency shifts. This leads us to explore rapid channel hopping as a strategy to withstand RF interference. We prototype a channel hopping design using PRISM NICs, and find that it can sustain throughput at levels of RF interference well above that needed to disrupt unmodified links, and at a reasonable cost in terms of switching overheads.

300 citations


"Performance Evaluation of LTE and W..." refers background in this paper

  • ...However, it is observed that the coexistence of heterogeneous systems in the same frequency bands causes a meaningful degradation on the system performance (e.g., Wi-Fi and Bluetooth [3], Wi-Fi and ZigBee [4], Wi-Fi and WiMAX [5])....

    [...]

  • ..., Wi-Fi and Bluetooth [3], Wi-Fi and ZigBee [4], Wi-Fi and WiMAX [5])....

    [...]

Trending Questions (1)
What is the difference between LTE and FIOS Internet?

Simulation results show that LTE system performance is slightly affected by coexistence whereas Wi-Fi is significantly impacted by LTE transmissions.