Performance of a permanent-magnet helicon source at 27 and 13 MHz
read more
Citations
Helicon discharges and sources: a review*
Review of inductively coupled plasmas: Nano-applications and bistable hysteresis physics
From nanometre to millimetre: a range of capabilities for plasma-enabled surface functionalization and nanostructuring
Effect of source diameter on helicon plasma thruster performance and its high power operation
Magnetic nozzle radiofrequency plasma thruster approaching twenty percent thruster efficiency
References
A review of recent laboratory double layer experiments
The role of Trivelpiece–Gould waves in antenna coupling to helicon waves
The low-field density peak in helicon discharges
Permanent Magnet Helicon Source for Ion Propulsion
1 – Helicon Plasma Sources
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. How much field is the magnet at the highest average B?
At the highest average B of 141G, the magnet is low, and the field lines are more curved, making B range from 89 to 192G within the tube.
Q3. What is the effect of the vertical extension on the tube?
With the vertical extension in place, the endplate of the tube can be removed, thus violating the Low Field Peak resonance condition.
Q4. What is the top of the discharge?
The top of the discharge is normally a solid, grounded aluminum plate forming the boundary condition for the low-field peak effect.
Q5. What is the disadvantage of helicon discharges?
Helicon discharges are known to be good sources of dense plasma for industrial applications, but they normally require a large, heavy electromagnet and its power supply.
Q6. What is the current use of the NdFeB magnet?
From its previous use as a plasma processing chamber, the interior sidewall is aluminized, and the exterior sidewall is covered with rows of small, round SmCo magnets for better plasma confinement.
Q7. What is the effect of helicon discharges?
This effect causes a useful increase in density occurring at a density that depends on the magnetic field and the length of the discharge tube.
Q8. How long did it take to scan the RF chokes?
The current-voltage (I – V) curves were taken by the ESP Mk2® system of Hiden Analytical, Ltd. Each scan consisted of about 200 points from -100 to ≈ +20V, taking about 5 sec.
Q9. What is the length of the probe tip?
The probe tip is a 5-mil (0.127 mm) diam tungsten rod, 0.7-1.2 cm long, centered in a 94-mil (2.39 mm) o.d. alumina tube 2.9 cm in length.
Q10. What was the optimal frequency for the Medusa 2 experiment?
In previous experiments at that frequency, two leak valves were used, one set for 30-40 mTorr, and11 the other for the operating pressure of 15-20 mTorr.
Q11. How do the authors calculate the total wall losses?
Although the authors do not have a z-profile inside the large chamber to calculate the total wall losses, the authors find that a single small source with a peak density below 4 × 1012 cm-3 can cover a substrate with plasma well above 1011 cm-3.
Q12. How much is the plasma radius in the tube?
the downstream density is only about a factor of 3 less than that in the tube, although the plasma radius is 21 cm downstream vs. only 2.5 cm in the tube.