scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Perioperative fast track program in intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

01 Jun 2011-Ejso (Elsevier)-Vol. 37, Iss: 6, pp 543-548
TL;DR: Surgery with peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC in advanced ovarian carcinoma is possible under fast track surgery programs in patients with low volume peritoneal carcinomatosis under the fast track program.
Abstract: Introduction Diffuse peritoneal dissemination in advanced ovarian cancer can be treated using optimal effort surgery involving peritonectomy procedures and the administration of hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Objective To report on our experience in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer using peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC through the fast track program. Patients and method From September 2008 until May 2010, forty-six patients with primary advanced (stage III-C) or recurrent ovarian cancer have been included in the fast track protocol if they had optimal cytoreduction CC-0 or CC-1 accompanied by HIPEC and there had no more than one digestive anastomosis. Results The mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 12.35 (3–21). The median operation time was 380 min (200–540). Optimal surgery CC-0 was achieved in 38 of the 46 patients and CC-1 in the remaining 8. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.94 ± 1.56 days (3–11). Major morbidity rates were 15.3%. Paralytic ileus was the most frequent of these. There was no mortality related to the procedure. Conclusion Surgery with peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC in advanced ovarian carcinoma is possible under fast track surgery programs in patients with low volume peritoneal carcinomatosis. Prospective and randomized studies are needed.

Summary (2 min read)

INTRODUCTION

  • Among factors related to morbidity and mortality, the learning curve is a crucial factor (30).
  • Fast-track surgery is a comprehensive approach, designed to accelerate recovery, reduce morbidity and shorten convalescence to ultimately improve outcomes and reduce costs (32).
  • Nephrectomy (42); radical prostatectomy (43); knee and hip prosthesis (44); abdominal aortic aneurysm (36); bariatric surgery (45,46) and lung resections (47) can all be carried out with a mean hospital admittance of less than 4 days and others such as antireflux surgery; suprarenalectomy; cholecystectomy; thyroidectomy; etc, are already carried out in many hospitals in ambulatory care (48,49).
  • This study evaluated fast-track protocol in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma who underwent peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC.

SURGICAL PROTOCOL

  • A xiphopubic laparotomy was performed, evaluating the overall resectability of the peritoneal disease.
  • Abdominal drainage was systematically left in the pelvis.
  • The authors group uses a 60 miligrams/m² dose of the intraperitoneal cytostatic paclitaxel (32 patients) according with the excellent results reported previously by Rufian et al (19) and BAE et al (20).
  • After cytoreduction the peritoneal cavity was positioned according to the “Coliseum” technique.
  • Two intracavity thermometers monitored the temperature within the peritoneal cavity during perfusion, which was kept constant between 42-43 ºC.

FAST-TRACK PROGRAM.

  • All patients received a low-residue diet one week before surgery and were admitted 1 day before surgery.
  • After the intervention, a nasogastric tube was not used.
  • Postoperative treatment included prokinetics (10-20 mgrs intravenous metoclopramide every 8 hours).
  • MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Morbidity and mortality data were collected.
  • Mild complications required medical or no treatment for resolution (grade I/II respectively).

RESULTS

  • Forty-six patients (80.7%) were enrolled and 11 patients were excluded from the protocol, (6 because they required at least 2 digestive anastomoses and 5 because they could not carry out optimal surgery for their peritoneal disease).
  • Right diaphragmatic peritonectomy (8 patients), splenectomy (2 patients), ureter resection (1 patient) and left diaphragmatic peritonectomy (1 patient) were needed to achieve complete cytoreduction.
  • Paralytic ileus (6 patients) was the most common complication.

DISCUSSION

  • The publication of the study by Kehlet in Lancet (33) has raised controversy about the classical attitude toward the postoperative management of surgically treated patients.
  • Some authors opt for the non-use of abdominal drainage after surgery.
  • The need for positioning the nasogastric tube due to vomiting when introducing orally administered food has been calculated to occur in at least 10% of cases (in their series 2 out of the 46 patients).
  • This is one of the points the surgeon has to inform the patient about in the preoperative visit, given that otherwise the speed of events could be shocking.
  • The authors preliminary data support the idea that in surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian origin with cytoreduction followed by HIPEC, the introduction of multimodal rehabilitation is reasonable in a group of selected patients with a low volume of carcinomatosis.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

HAL Id: hal-00696628
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00696628
Submitted on 13 May 2012
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entic research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diusion de documents
scientiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Perioperative fast track program in intraoperative
hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec) after
cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
Pedro Antonio Cascales Campos, José Gil Martinez, Pedro J. Galindo
Fernandez, Elena Gil Gomez, Isabel María Martínez Frutos, Pascual Parrilla
Paricio
To cite this version:
Pedro Antonio Cascales Campos, José Gil Martinez, Pedro J. Galindo Fernandez, Elena Gil Gomez,
Isabel María Martínez Frutos, et al.. Perioperative fast track program in intraoperative hy-
perthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec) after cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian
cancer. EJSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology, WB Saunders, 2011, 37 (6), pp.543.
�10.1016/j.ejso.2011.03.134�. �hal-00696628�

Accepted Manuscript
Title: Perioperative fast track program in intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal
chemotherapy (hipec) after cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
Authors: Pedro Antonio Cascales Campos, José Gil Martinez, Pedro J. Galindo
Fernandez, Elena Gil Gomez, Isabel María Martínez Frutos, Pascual Parrilla Paricio
PII: S0748-7983(11)00218-6
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.03.134
Reference: YEJSO 3142
To appear in:
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Accepted Date: 17 March 2011
Please cite this article as: Cascales Campos PA, Martinez G, Galindo Fernandez PJ, Gomez EG,
Martínez Frutos IM, Paricio PP. Perioperative fast track program in intraoperative hyperthermic
intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec) after cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer, European
Journal of Surgical Oncology (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.03.134
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

MANUS CRIP T
ACCEP TED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PERIOPERATIVE FAST TRACK PROGRAM IN
INTRAOPERATIVE HYPERTHERMIC INTRAPERITONEAL
CHEMOTHERAPY (HIPEC) AFTER CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY
IN ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER.
Pedro Antonio Cascales Campos*, José Gil Martinez*, Pedro J. Galindo Fernandez*,
Elena Gil Gomez*, Isabel María Martínez Frutos*, Pascual Parrilla Paricio*
*Department of Surgery.
Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (Murcia-Spain)
Contact Author
Pedro Antonio Cascales Campos
Calle Dr Fleming Nº 12 3º E
La Alberca, Murcia (Spain)
CP: 30150
e-mail: cascalex@yahoo.es

MANUS CRIP T
ACCEP TED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Diffuse peritoneal dissemination in advanced ovarian cancer can be
treated using optimal effort surgery involving peritonectomy procedures and the
administration of hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
OBJECTIVE: To report on our experience in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer
using peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC through the fast track program. PATIENTS
AND METHOD: From September 2008 until May 2010, forty-six patients with primary
advanced (stage III-C) or recurrent ovarian cancer have been included in the fast track
protocol if they had optimal cytoreduction CC-0 or CC-1 accompanied by HIPEC and
there had no more than one digestive anastomosis. RESULTS: The mean peritoneal
cancer index (PCI) was 12.35 (3-21). The median operation time was 380 minutes (200-
540). Optimal surgery CC-0 was achieved in 38 of the 46 patients and CC-1 in the
remaining 8. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.94±1.56 days (3-11). Major
morbidity rates were 15.3%. Paralytic ileus was the most frequent of these. There was no
mortality related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Surgery with peritonectomy
procedures and HIPEC in advanced ovarian carcinoma is possible under fast track surgery
programs in patients with low volume peritoneal carcinomatosis. Prospective and
randomized studies are needed.

MANUS CRIP T
ACCEP TED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
INTRODUCTION
Since Sugarbaker’s publication in 1995 about the surgical treatment of peritoneal
carcinomatosis (1), the approach for the peritoneal dissemination of pathologies such as
colorectal carcinoma, peritoneal pseudomixoma, peritoneal mesotelioma and advanced
ovarian carcinoma has undergone serious remodelling. The approach changed from non-
committal attitude toward the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis to a much more
active attitude leading to more aggressive surgery being carried out including
peritonectomy procedures and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
(HIPEC) (2-21). The overall rate of severe perioperative morbidity ranged from 0 to 40%
and the mortality rate varied from 0 to 10% (22-29), with a mean hospital stay of over two
weeks (21, 23, 26, 31, 33). Among factors related to morbidity and mortality, the learning
curve is a crucial factor (30).
Fast-track surgery is a comprehensive approach, designed to
accelerate recovery,
reduce morbidity and shorten convalescence
to ultimately improve outcomes and reduce
costs (32). The introduction of Fast-track programs achieves good results in postoperative
outcomes in many surgical pathologies (34-41). For instance, nephrectomy (42); radical
prostatectomy (43); knee and hip prosthesis (44); abdominal aortic aneurysm (36);
bariatric surgery (45,46) and lung resections (47) can all be carried out with a mean
hospital admittance of less than 4 days and others such as antireflux surgery;
suprarenalectomy; cholecystectomy; thyroidectomy; etc, are already carried out in many
hospitals in ambulatory care (48,49). In the literature no experience has been reported of
fast-track programs in surgery with peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC for peritoneal
surface malignancies such advanced ovarian cancer.
This study evaluated fast-track protocol in patients with advanced ovarian
carcinoma who underwent peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC.
PATIENTS AND METHOD

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematic review and meta‐analysis were performed to provide an overview of current evidence and to examine their effect on postoperative outcomes in women undergoing open gynecologic surgery.
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery pathways have been widely accepted and implemented for different types of surgery. Their overall effect in abdominal gynecologic surgery is still underdetermined. A systematic review and metaanalysis were performed to provide an overview of current evidence and to examine their effect on postoperative outcomes in women undergoing open gynecologic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Searches were conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library up to June 27, 2014. Reference lists were screened to identify additional studies. Studies were included if at least four individual items of an enhanced recovery pathway were described. Outcomes included length of hospital stay, complication rates, readmissions, and mortality. Quantitative analysis was limited to comparative studies. Effect sizes were presented as relative risks or as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Thirty-one records, involving 16 observational studies, were included. Diversity in reported elements within studies was observed. Preoperative education, early oral intake, and early mobilization were included in all pathways. Five studies, with a high risk of bias, were eligible for quantitative analysis. Enhanced recovery pathways reduced primary (MD -1.57 days, 95%CI -2.94 to -0.20) and total (MD -3.05 days, 95%CI -4.87 to -1.23) length of hospital stay as compared to traditional perioperative care, without an increase in complication, mortality, and readmission rates. CONCLUSION: The available evidence based on a broad range of non-randomized studies at high risk of bias suggests that enhanced recovery pathways may reduce length of postoperative hospital stay in abdominal gynecologic surgery. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

87 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although surgical resection remains the central element in curative treatment of gastrointestinal cancer, increasing emphasis and resource has been focused on neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy.
Abstract: Background: Although surgical resection remains the central element in curative treatment of gastrointestinal cancer, increasing emphasis and resource has been focused on neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Developments in these modalities have improved outcomes, but far less attention has been paid to improving oncological outcomes through optimization of perioperative care. Methods: A narrative review is presented based on available and updated literature in English and the authors' experience with enhanced recovery research. Results: A range of perioperative factors (such as lifestyle, co-morbidity, anaemia, sarcopenia, medications, regional analgesia and minimal access surgery) are modifiable, and can be optimized to reduce short- and long-term morbidity and mortality, improve functional capacity and quality of life, and possibly improve oncological outcome. The effect on cancer-free and overall survival may be of equal magnitude to that achieved by many adjuvant oncological regimens. Modulation of core factors, such as nutritional status, systemic inflammation, and surgical and disease-mediated stress, probably influences the host's immune surveillance and defence status both directly and through reduced postoperative morbidity. Conclusion: A wider view on long-term effects of expanded or targeted enhanced recovery protocols is warranted. Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

86 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
C. Raspé1, Lilit Flöther1, R. Schneider1, M. Bucher1, P. Piso 
01 Jun 2017-Ejso
TL;DR: This is an extensive update on all relevant topics for anesthetists and intensivists dealing with CRS and HIPEC.
Abstract: Due to the significantly improved outcome and quality of life of patients with different tumor entities after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC, there is an increasing number of centers performing CRS and HIPEC procedures. As this procedure is technically challenging with potential high morbidity and mortality, respectively, institutional experience also in the anesthetic and intensive care departments is essential for optimal treatment and prevention of adverse events. Clinical pathways have to be developed to achieve also good results in more comorbid patients with border line indications and extensive surgical procedures. The anesthesiologist has deal with relevant fluid, blood and protein losses, increased intraabdominal pressure, systemic hypo-/hyperthermia, and increased metabolic rate in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. It is of utmost importance to maintain or restore an adequate volume by aggressive substitution of intravenous fluids, which counteracts the increased fluid loss and venous capacitance during this procedure. Supplementary thoracic epidural analgesia, non-invasive ventilation, and physiotherapy are recommended to guarantee adequate pain therapy and postoperative extubation as well as fast-track concepts. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring is essential to help the anesthesiologist picking up information about the real-time fluid status of the patient. Preoperative preconditioning is mandatory in patients scheduled for HIPEC surgery and will result in improved outcome. Postoperatively, volume status optimization, early nutritional support, sufficient anticoagulation, and point of care coagulation management are essential. This is an extensive update on all relevant topics for anesthetists and intensivists dealing with CRS and HIPEC.

84 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The available evidence suggests that a potential survival benefit of adding HIPEC may be largest in the settings of secondary CRS for stage III ovarian cancer and salvage C RS for recurrent ovarian cancer, two time-points representing failure of initial standard therapy.
Abstract: The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer consists in complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intravenous combination chemotherapy with a platinum compound and a taxane. Although response rates to initial therapy are high, many patients will recur and die of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The addition of Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) to the standard therapy aims at increasing survival by reducing peritoneal recurrence. This review describes the survival results of HIPEC at the different time-points of the treatment of ovarian cancer: at upfront CRS, at interval CRS, at consolidation CRS after complete response to initial therapy, at secondary CRS after incomplete response, at salvage CRS for recurrence and as palliative treatment without CRS for unresectable ovarian cancer with chemotherapy resistant ascites. The available evidence suggests that a potential survival benefit of adding HIPEC may be largest in the settings of secondary CRS for stage III ovarian cancer and salvage CRS for recurrent ovarian cancer, two time-points representing failure of initial standard therapy. There is much less evidence for a potential benefit of HIPEC for less advanced stages (I-II) and for earlier time-points in the treatment of ovarian cancer (upfront, interval and consolidation). Postoperative mortality is not higher after CRS and HIPEC (0.7%) than after CRS only (1.4%). Four randomised trials are ongoing and their results are eagerly awaited. Palliative HIPEC without CRS might be used more in patients with incapacitating ascites due to recurrent ovarian cancer which has become resistant to systemic chemotherapy.

73 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work reviews the published literature on ERAS programs in gynecology and recommends preoperative counseling to the patient, no bowel preparation, an opioid-sparing multimodal approach to pain management, goal-directed fluid management, minimally invasive surgery when possible, and early mobilization and feeding.
Abstract: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), or "fast-track" protocol, aims to minimize the physiologic stress of surgery and optimize the rehabilitation of patients. However, there is limited data in obstetrics and gynecology. We reviewed the published literature on ERAS programs in gynecology to evaluate the outcomes and potential key elements for a successful program. Fifty studies were evaluated. We recommend preoperative counseling to the patient, no bowel preparation, an opioid-sparing multimodal approach to pain management, goal-directed fluid management, minimally invasive surgery when possible, and early mobilization and feeding. This is a multidisciplinary team effort and requires active patient participation in the process.

70 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cytoreduction followed by HIPEC improves survival in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin, however, patients with involvement of six or more regions of the abdominal cavity, or grossly incomplete cytoreduction, had still a grave prognosis.
Abstract: Purpose: To confirm the findings from uncontrolled studies that aggressive cytoreduction in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is superior to standard treatment in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer origin. Patients and Methods: Between February 1998 and August 2001, 105 patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard treatment consisting of systemic chemotherapy (fluorouracil-leucovorin) with or without palliative surgery, or experimental therapy consisting of aggressive cytoreduction with HIPEC, followed by the same systemic chemotherapy regime. The primary end point was survival. Results: After a median follow-up period of 21.6 months, the median survival was 12.6 months in the standard therapy arm and 22.3 months in the experimental therapy arm (log-rank test, P = .032). The treatment-related mortality in the aggressive therapy group was 8%. Most complications from HIPEC were related to bowel leakage. Subgroup analysis of the HIPEC g...

1,735 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Multimodal evidence-based care within the fast-track methodology significantly enhances postoperative recovery and reduces morbidity, and should therefore be more widely adopted.
Abstract: Background:Optimization of postoperative outcome requires the application of evidence-based principles of care carefully integrated into a multimodal rehabilitation program.Objective:To assess, synthesize, and discuss implementation of “fast-track” recovery programs.Data Sources:Medline MBASE (Janua

1,500 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The anaesthetist has an important role in facilitating early postoperative recovery by provision of minimally-invasive anaesthesia and pain relief, and by collaborating with surgeons, surgical nurses, and physiotherapists to reduce risk and pain.
Abstract: The specialty of anaesthesia has seen major advances thanks to the development of safer anaesthetic agents, improved knowledge of pain physiology and pain management, and incorporation of a better understanding of perioperative pathophysiology into perioperative care. Concomitantly, development of minimally invasive surgery has further reduced stress responses and pain, thereby providing potential for enhanced recovery. However, an increasing proportion of elderly patients with organ dysfunction has led to demands for further reductions in postoperative complications and the costs of treating them. The transition from inpatient surgery to ambulatory procedures has proceeded at a rate that was unthinkable a few decades ago, but could all surgical procedures ultimately be done on an outpatient basis? If not, why do patients need to be in hospital, and what prevents ambulatory surgery from being the norm? 1

1,276 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy achieved long-term survival in a selected group of patients with PC from colorectal origin with acceptable morbidity and mortality.
Abstract: Purpose The three principal studies dedicated to the natural history of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer consistently showed median survival ranging between 6 and 8 months. New approaches combining cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy suggest improved survival. Patients and Methods A retrospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the international experience with this combined treatment and to identify the principal prognostic indicators. All patients had cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia and/or immediate postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy). PC from appendiceal origin was excluded. Results The study included 506 patients from 28 institutions operated between May 1987 and December 2002. Their median age was 51 years. The median follow-up was 53 months. The morbidity and mortality rates were 22.9% and 4%, respectively. The overall median survival was 19.2 months. Pati...

1,094 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To determine the security and effectiveness of MBP on morbidity and mortality in colorectal surgery, six trials and a new comparison (Mechanical bowel preparation versus enema) were added.
Abstract: Background For more than a century the presence of bowel content during surgery has been related to anastomotic leakage. Mechanical bowel preparation has been considered an efficient agent against leakage and infections complications. This dogma is not based on solid evidence, but more on observational data and expert´s opinions. Objectives To determine the security and effectiveness of prophylactic mechanical bowel preparation for morbidity and mortality rates in colorectal surgery. The following hypothesis was tested: "The use of mechanical bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery reduces the incidence of postoperative complications". Search strategy All publications describing mechanical bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery was sought through computerized searches of EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library; by hand-searching in relevant medical journals, from major gastroenterological congresses, without limitation for date and language, using the search strategy described by the Colorectal Cancer Review Group. In addition, randomised clinical trials will be searched through personal communication with colleagues and from conference proceedings Selection criteria STUDIES: All randomised, clinical trials, that were performed in order to answer the hypothesis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients submitted elective colorectal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Any strategy in mechanical bowel preparation compared with no mechanical bowel preparation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 1. Anastomosis leakage- stratified for rectum and colon 2. Overall anastomotic leakage SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 3. Mortality 4. Peritonitis 5. Re operation 6. Wound Infection 7 Infectious extra-abdominal complication 8. Non-infection extra-abdominal 9. Overall surgical site infections Data collection and analysis Data was independently extracted by two reviewers and cross-checked. The methodological quality of each trial was assessed by the same two reviewers. Details of the randomisation (generation and concealment), blinding, whether an intention-to-treat analysis was done, and the number of patients lost to follow-up was recorded. The results of each RCT was summarised in 2 x 2 tables for each outcome. For analysis the Peto-Odds ratio was used as defaults (no statistical heterogeneity was observed) Main results Of the 1159 patients with anastomosis (6 RCTs), 576 were allocated for mechanical bowel preparation (groups 1) and 583 for no preparation (groups 2) before elective colorectal surgery. Of 1204 patients totally enrolled 595 were in groups 1 and 609 in groups 2. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 1) Anastomotic leakage - stratified:A) Low anterior resection: 12.5% (6 of 48 patients in 1) compared with 12% (6 of 50 patients in 2); Peto OR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.35 - 3.96 (non-significant) B) Colonic surgery: 1.16% (2 of 172 patients in 1) compared with 0.6% (1 of 166 patients in 2) ; Peto OR 1.75, 95% CI: 0.18 - 17.02 2) Overall anastomotic leakage: 5.5% (32 of 576 patients in 1) compared with 2.9% (17 of 583 patients in 2); Peto OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.09 - 3.43 (P=0.02) SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 3) Mortality: 0.6% (2 of 329 patients in 1) compared with 0% (0 of 326 patients in 2); Peto OR 7.95, 95% CI: 0.49 - 128.34 (non-significant) 4) Peritonitis: 5.1% ( 13 of 254 patients in 1) compared with 2.8% (7 of 252 patients in 2); Peto OR 1.90, 95% CI: 0.78 -4.64) (non significant) 5) Reoperation: 3.3% ( 11 of 329 patients) compared with 2.5% (8 of 326 patients); Peto OR 1.40, 95% CI: 0.56 - 3.49) (non-significant) 6) Wound infection: 7.4% (44 of 595 patients in 1) compared with 5.7% (35 of 609 patients in 2); Peto OR 1.34, 95% CI: 0.85 - 2.13 (non-significant) 7) Infectious extra-abdominal complication: 8.3% ( 14 of 168 patients in 1) compared with 9.4% (15 of 159 patients in 2); Peto OR, 95%: 0.87 (0.41 - 1.87) 8) Non-infection extra-abdominal complication: 8.0% ( 20 of 250 patients in 1) compared with 7.0% (17 of 246 patients in 2); Peto OR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.61 - 2.32 (non-significant) - 9) Surgical site infection: 9.8% (31 of 325 patients in 1) compared with 8.3% (27 of 322 patients in 2); Peto OR 1.20, 95% CI: 0.70 - 2.05 (non-significant) - Reviewers' conclusions The results failed to support the hypothesis that bowel preparation reduces anastomotic leak rates and other complications. There was no a priori hypothesis that bowel preparation may increase anastomotic leak rates, so this was not stated. Thus, the routine use of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery is questioned.

783 citations

Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Perioperative fast track program in intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec) after cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer" ?

In this paper, the authors report on their experience in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer using peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC through the fast track program.