Personality and suicidal ideation in the elderly: Factorial invariance and latent means structures across age
Summary (2 min read)
Participants
- From November 2012 to May 2013, 655 participants aged 18–75 years were contacted at universities, markets, supermarkets, shops, banks, public parks, post offices, and senior centers in three Italian regions: Lombardia, Veneto, and Lazio, and their respective districts.
- These three nonrandomly selected regions are highly representative of the current demographic background of Italy.
- Lombardia and Veneto are located in the north part of the country, with approximately 9 million and 5 million residents, respectively, while Lazio is located in the central part of the country, with more than 5.5 million residents.
- The respondents voluntarily participated in this study after providing written informed consent.
- The authors created two 17-year age groups on the basis of participants’ age: the Young Adults and the Older Adults.
Measures
- The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996) is a 21-item self-report measure of symptoms of depression.
- Several authors have noted that although generally accepted in clinical and research contexts, the original dichotomous response format is likely to constrict measurement variance and determine lower sensitivity (Hayslip, Lopez, & Nation, 1991; Hill, Gallagher, Thompson, & Ishida, 1988; Neufeld et al., 2010).
- The presentation of each picture is accompanied by two equal lists of nine differential semantic scales anchored by opposed terms.
- In summary, the authors used the two general indicators, self-perception (Cronbach’s alpha ¼ .91) and other-perception (Cronbach’s alpha¼ .89), scored by adding up the score of the nine self-related and the nine other-related scales, respectively.
Statistical analyses
- The authors used two-tailed t-tests for continuous variables, and chi-square tests with Yates’ correction where appropriate for categorical variables.
- The CFA implies the formal specification of the measurement instrument in terms of a factor model, the statistical fitting of the factor model to the observed data (variances and covariances or correlations), the assessment of fit, and the interpretation of the results if the model is consistent with the data (Bollen, 1989; Byrne, 2010).
- This multigroup model serves two important functions: it allows for invariance tests to be conducted across the groups simultaneously, and in testing for invariance, the fit of this configural model provides the baseline value against which subsequent specified invariance models can be compared.
- In addition to the x2/df test, the authors utilized the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990), the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI; Tucker & Lewis, 1973), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; Steiger, 1990) and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR; J€oreskog & S€orbom, 1996).
- Specifically, the authors tested for equivalency of the factorial measurement, the scales representing the observed variables, and the underlying latent structure as well as the relations among dimensions of personality and SI risk across the Young Adults and the Older Adults.
Results
- On the basis of the working status, participants were divided into two groups: Unemployed and Employed.
- The sociodemographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Baseline models
- Hence, the authors excluded these last three variables from the model.
- These results evidenced a misspecification, and the modification indices suggested that model fit would be improved with the estimation of the error covariance between self and other perception.
- The suggested subsequent estimation of the error covariance between depression and hopelessness, improved considerably the goodness-of-fit statistics.
Scalar invariance
- Model 4 (Table 4) tested whether variables and factor error variances were equal for both of the groups.
- These results indicated that the error variances for the two latent factors and the eight observed variables were identical across groups.
Discussion
- In the present study, the authors tested a theoretical model representing a latent structure composed by a pattern of associations among personality characteristics and risk factors for SI across young adults and older adults.
- The results show a comparable pattern of relations between the observed variables and their underlying latent constructs across the two groups, implying that both the young and the older adults scoring high in specific personality (self–other perception and introversion) and psychiatric (depressive symptoms and hopelessness) dimensions were similarly exposed to increased risk of SI.
- This will allow to clarify direct and indirect relations among various sets of variables and to outline more comprehensive theoretical models.
- Second, trained personnel should support the implementation of information, assessment, and prompt intervention policies in community-based old age psychiatry services as well as in medical and psychological emergencies.
- The present study has some notable limitations.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
42 citations
39 citations
Cites methods from "Personality and suicidal ideation i..."
...(Iliceto, Fino, Sabatello, and Candilera [45] established measurement invariance regarding age in a larger model including the BHS, using a Likert scale and Iliceto and Fino tested for general model invariance in two random subsamples....
[...]
27 citations
21 citations
Cites result from "Personality and suicidal ideation i..."
...These results are aligned with previous research that consistently demonstrates that high Neuroticism and low Extraversion are both predictive of high SI (Heisel & Flett, 2006; Iliceto et al., 2014; Segal et al., 2012; Useda et al., 2004)....
[...]
...These results are aligned with previous research that consistently demonstrates that high Neuroticism and low Extraversion are both predictive of high SI (Heisel & Flett, 2006; Iliceto et al., 2014; Segal et al., 2012; Useda et al., 2004)....
[...]
References
6,359 citations
"Personality and suicidal ideation i..." refers methods in this paper
...In addition to the x2/df test, we utilized the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990), the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI; Tucker & Lewis, 1973), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; Steiger, 1990) and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR; J€oreskog & S€orbom, 1996)....
[...]
6,086 citations
"Personality and suicidal ideation i..." refers methods in this paper
...A series of multigroup CFA-nested models were constructed to examine the evidence of measurement invariance (i.e. configural, metric, scalar, strict) and then the latent mean structures (Vandenberg & Lance, 2000)....
[...]
5,976 citations
4,754 citations
"Personality and suicidal ideation i..." refers background in this paper
...In this regard, although research demonstrated the predictive power of the BHS (Pompili et al., 2009; Pompili et al., 2011), it is possible that false positives may be induced by other contributing factors, limiting the validity of results....
[...]
...The BHS (Beck & Steer, 1987; Beck et al., 1974; Pompili et al., 2009) is a 20-item true or false self-report scale developed to operationalize the construct of hopelessness....
[...]
...The results of the study provided support to the revised response format of the BHS, showing good psychometric properties and enhancing measurement sensitivity of SI among older adults....
[...]
...In particular, hopelessness has been reported as the most common emotion experienced among suicidal individuals (Shneidman, 1996), and research supports a positive relation between scores at the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) (Beck, Weissman, Lester, & Trexler, 1974) and measures of depression, suicidal intent, and ideation in clinical and nonclinical populations....
[...]
...In particular, Neufeld et al. (2010, p. 752) assessed SI in a sample of older adults, changing the response format of the BHS to a Likert-type scale....
[...]
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Personality and suicidal ideation in the elderly: factorial invariance and latent means structures across age" ?
In the suicidal ideation factor, neuroticism was related to a perception of negative mood and future expectations, whereas in the personality factor, introversion was associated with a negative perception of the self and the others. In particular, in this study the authors focused on testing the invariance of factors between the two groups, and they believe that future research efforts should be addressed to examining the structure of these factors, especially from a mediational perspective. The authors found a common underlying latent structure for elderly and young adults, suggesting that most predictors of SI are common across these groups, although it is possible that the salience of their associations may vary across age. Further examination of the theoretical model with more comprehensive samples ( including residents in other Italian regions where suicidal rates are lower, as well as residents in other countries ) may reveal informative.
Q3. How is the fit of the configural model tested?
Metric invariance is tested by imposing equality constraints on corresponding factor loadings and comparing the fit of the constrained model to the configural model.
Q4. What can be done to test for factorial equivalence?
To test for factorial equivalence, given that the estimation of baseline models involves no between-group constraints, the data can be analyzed separately for each group.
Q5. What is the definition of a metric invariance test?
Scalar invariance requires that the intercepts of the observed variables are the same across groups and is tested by imposing equality constraints on the intercepts and assessing model fit in comparison to the metric invariant model.
Q6. How did the authors evaluate the underlying structure of personality dimensions?
nine scales representing depression, hopelessness, attachment representations of the self and the other, and the alternative five-factor model of personality, as well as the underlying latent structure of these observed variables characterizing dimensions of personality and SI risk, were tested in young adults and older adults.
Q7. What is the mortality rate among the elderly?
Recent epidemiological studies indicate a death rate of 6.1/ 100,000 inhabitants among individuals aged 25–44, 8.4 among those aged 45–64, and 11.3 among those aged >65 (Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, 2011).
Q8. What is the effect of the dichotomous response format on the measure of hopelessness?
Several authors have noted that although generally accepted in clinical and research contexts, the original dichotomous response format is likely to constrict measurement variance and determine lower sensitivity (Hayslip, Lopez, & Nation, 1991; Hill, Gallagher, Thompson, & Ishida, 1988; Neufeld et al., 2010).
Q9. What is the main cause of death in the elderly?
In Italy, suicide is the third major cause of death in the adult population, and rates tend to rise with age (Pompili et al., 2010).
Q10. What is the purpose of the CFA?
CFA seeks to determine if the number of factors and the loadings of measured (indicator) variables conform to what is expected by the pre-established theory.
Q11. What is the definition of a factor analysis?
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) allows for a test of specific hypotheses concerning the relation between observed variables and their underlying latent constructs.
Q12. What were the alphas for aggression, activity, extraversion, neuroticism, and?
The authors reported that alphas for aggressiveness, activity, extraversion, neuroticism, and sensation seeking were .78–.81, .76–.73, .75–.75, .74–.79, and .70–.72 for the Spanish and American samples, respectively.
Q13. What is the importance of improving research?
The authors highlight here the importance of improving research, particularly aiming at identifying risk factors for suicidality in the elderly and providing a more comprehensive theoretical framework.
Q14. What is the main reason for the increase in suicide in the elderly?
Although fatal attempts in the elderly are more frequent than in younger adults, there is evidence that the elderly are less likely to present long-term elaboration of suicidal thoughts and to communicate their intent and ideation (Conwell et al., 1998).
Q15. How did Wiktorsson et al. (2013) find that suicide attempters aged 75?
In the same vein, Wiktorsson et al. (2013) found that suicide attempters aged 75 and above scored higher on neuroticism than comparisons, and lower on the extraversion scale.
Q16. What is the definition of a measurement model?
The measurement model specifies hypotheses about the relations between a set of observed variables and the unobserved variables or constructs that they were designed to measure.
Q17. What are the main reasons for the increase in suicide among the elderly?
the progressive increase in average life expectancy and the aging of the population exhort researchers to investigate and assess risk factors for suicidal ideation (SI) in the elderly.