scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Perturbative treatment of the similarity transformed Hamiltonian in equation‐of‐motion coupled‐cluster approximations

15 Jul 1995-Journal of Chemical Physics (American Institute of Physics)-Vol. 103, Iss: 3, pp 1064-1076
TL;DR: A series of sizeconsistent approximations to the equation-of-motion coupled cluster method in the singles and doubles approximation (EOM•CCSD) are developed by subjecting the similarity transformed Hamiltonian H=exp(−T)H exp(T) to a perturbation expansion as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: A series of size‐consistent approximations to the equation‐of‐motion coupled cluster method in the singles and doubles approximation (EOM‐CCSD) are developed by subjecting the similarity transformed Hamiltonian H=exp(−T)H exp(T) to a perturbation expansion Attention is directed to N and N−1 electron final state realizations of the method defined by truncation of H at second order Explicit spin–orbital equations for the energy and its first derivative are documented for both approaches [EOMEE‐CCSD(2) and EOMIP‐CCSD(2), respectively], and have been implemented in a large‐scale quantum chemistry program Vertical ionization potentials calculated by EOMIP‐CCSD(2) are shown to be equivalent to those of an approach presented recently by Nooijen and Snijders [J Chem Phys 102, 1681 (1995)] Applications of both EOMIP‐CCSD(2) and EOMEE‐CCSD(2) provide results for final state properties that compare favorably with those obtained in full EOM‐CCSD calculations Analysis of the computational aspects of the approximate and full EOM‐CCSD methods shows that the cost of EOMIP‐CCSD(2) energy and gradient calculations scales in proportion to the fifth power of the basis set size, a significant savings over the sixth power dependence of EOMIP‐CCSD This feature is of great practical importance, as it shows that this N−1 electron final state approach has a large domain of applicability and is therefore likely to become a valuable tool for application calculations On the other hand, the same cannot be said for EOMEE‐CCSD(2) since its asymptotic computational dependence and storage requirements are the same as the full EOMEE‐CCSD method
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of NWChem is provided focusing primarily on the core theoretical modules provided by the code and their parallel performance, as well as Scalable parallel implementations and modular software design enable efficient utilization of current computational architectures.

4,666 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the derivation and implementation of excited state gradients are reported for the approximate coupled-cluster singles and doubles model CC2 employing the resolution-of-the-identity approximation for electron repulsion integrals.
Abstract: The derivation and implementation of excited state gradients is reported for the approximate coupled-cluster singles and doubles model CC2 employing the resolution-of-the-identity approximation for electron repulsion integrals. The implementation is profiled for a set of examples with up to 1348 basis functions and exhibits no I/O bottlenecks. A test set of sample molecules is used to assess the performance of the CC2 model for adiabatic excitation energies, excited state structure constants and vibrational frequencies. We find very promising results, especially for adiabatic excitation energies, though the need of a single-reference ground state and a single-replacement dominated excited state puts some limits on the applicability of the method. Its reliability, however, can always be tested on grounds of diagnostic measures. As an example application, we present calculations on the π*←π excited state of trans-azobenzene.

369 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that several iterative and noniterative approximations to higher excitations can be efficiently implemented with the aid of the proposed algorithm and that the coding effort is mostly reduced to the generation of the corresponding formulas.
Abstract: The possibilities for the approximate treatment of higher excitations in coupled-cluster (CC) theory are discussed. Potential routes for the generalization of corresponding approximations to lower-level CC methods are analyzed for higher excitations. A general string-based algorithm is presented for the evaluation of the special contractions appearing in the equations specific to those approximate CC models. It is demonstrated that several iterative and noniterative approximations to higher excitations can be efficiently implemented with the aid of our algorithm and that the coding effort is mostly reduced to the generation of the corresponding formulas. The performance of the proposed and implemented methods for total energies is assessed with special regard to quadruple and pentuple excitations. The applicability of our approach is illustrated by benchmark calculations for the butadiene molecule. Our results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm enables us to consider the effect of quadruple excitations for molecular systems consisting of up to 10–12 atoms.

348 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Edoardo Aprà1, Eric J. Bylaska1, W. A. de Jong2, Niranjan Govind1, Karol Kowalski1, T. P. Straatsma3, Marat Valiev1, H. J. J. van Dam4, Yuri Alexeev5, J. Anchell6, V. Anisimov5, Fredy W. Aquino, Raymond Atta-Fynn7, Jochen Autschbach8, Nicholas P. Bauman1, Jeffrey C. Becca9, David E. Bernholdt10, K. Bhaskaran-Nair11, Stuart Bogatko12, Piotr Borowski13, Jeffery S. Boschen14, Jiří Brabec15, Adam Bruner16, Emilie Cauet17, Y. Chen18, Gennady N. Chuev19, Christopher J. Cramer20, Jeff Daily1, M. J. O. Deegan, Thom H. Dunning21, Michel Dupuis8, Kenneth G. Dyall, George I. Fann10, Sean A. Fischer22, Alexandr Fonari23, Herbert A. Früchtl24, Laura Gagliardi20, Jorge Garza25, Nitin A. Gawande1, Soumen Ghosh20, Kurt R. Glaesemann1, Andreas W. Götz26, Jeff R. Hammond6, Volkhard Helms27, Eric D. Hermes28, Kimihiko Hirao, So Hirata29, Mathias Jacquelin2, Lasse Jensen9, Benny G. Johnson, Hannes Jónsson30, Ricky A. Kendall10, Michael Klemm6, Rika Kobayashi31, V. Konkov32, Sriram Krishnamoorthy1, M. Krishnan18, Zijing Lin33, Roberto D. Lins34, Rik J. Littlefield, Andrew J. Logsdail35, Kenneth Lopata36, Wan Yong Ma37, Aleksandr V. Marenich20, J. Martin del Campo38, Daniel Mejía-Rodríguez39, Justin E. Moore6, Jonathan M. Mullin, Takahito Nakajima, Daniel R. Nascimento1, Jeffrey A. Nichols10, P. J. Nichols40, J. Nieplocha1, Alberto Otero-de-la-Roza41, Bruce J. Palmer1, Ajay Panyala1, T. Pirojsirikul42, Bo Peng1, Roberto Peverati32, Jiri Pittner15, L. Pollack, Ryan M. Richard43, P. Sadayappan44, George C. Schatz45, William A. Shelton36, Daniel W. Silverstein46, D. M. A. Smith6, Thereza A. Soares47, Duo Song1, Marcel Swart, H. L. Taylor48, G. S. Thomas1, Vinod Tipparaju49, Donald G. Truhlar20, Kiril Tsemekhman, T. Van Voorhis50, Álvaro Vázquez-Mayagoitia5, Prakash Verma, Oreste Villa51, Abhinav Vishnu1, Konstantinos D. Vogiatzis52, Dunyou Wang53, John H. Weare26, Mark J. Williamson54, Theresa L. Windus14, Krzysztof Wolinski13, A. T. Wong, Qin Wu4, Chan-Shan Yang2, Q. Yu55, Martin Zacharias56, Zhiyong Zhang57, Yan Zhao58, Robert W. Harrison59 
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory1, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory2, National Center for Computational Sciences3, Brookhaven National Laboratory4, Argonne National Laboratory5, Intel6, University of Texas at Arlington7, State University of New York System8, Pennsylvania State University9, Oak Ridge National Laboratory10, Washington University in St. Louis11, Wellesley College12, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University13, Iowa State University14, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic15, University of Tennessee at Martin16, Université libre de Bruxelles17, Facebook18, Russian Academy of Sciences19, University of Minnesota20, University of Washington21, United States Naval Research Laboratory22, Georgia Institute of Technology23, University of St Andrews24, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana25, University of California, San Diego26, Saarland University27, Sandia National Laboratories28, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign29, University of Iceland30, Australian National University31, Florida Institute of Technology32, University of Science and Technology of China33, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation34, Cardiff University35, Louisiana State University36, Chinese Academy of Sciences37, National Autonomous University of Mexico38, University of Florida39, Los Alamos National Laboratory40, University of Oviedo41, Prince of Songkla University42, Ames Laboratory43, University of Utah44, Northwestern University45, Universal Display Corporation46, Federal University of Pernambuco47, CD-adapco48, Cray49, Massachusetts Institute of Technology50, Nvidia51, University of Tennessee52, Shandong Normal University53, University of Cambridge54, Advanced Micro Devices55, Technische Universität München56, Stanford University57, Wuhan University of Technology58, Stony Brook University59
TL;DR: The NWChem computational chemistry suite is reviewed, including its history, design principles, parallel tools, current capabilities, outreach, and outlook.
Abstract: Specialized computational chemistry packages have permanently reshaped the landscape of chemical and materials science by providing tools to support and guide experimental efforts and for the prediction of atomistic and electronic properties. In this regard, electronic structure packages have played a special role by using first-principle-driven methodologies to model complex chemical and materials processes. Over the past few decades, the rapid development of computing technologies and the tremendous increase in computational power have offered a unique chance to study complex transformations using sophisticated and predictive many-body techniques that describe correlated behavior of electrons in molecular and condensed phase systems at different levels of theory. In enabling these simulations, novel parallel algorithms have been able to take advantage of computational resources to address the polynomial scaling of electronic structure methods. In this paper, we briefly review the NWChem computational chemistry suite, including its history, design principles, parallel tools, current capabilities, outreach, and outlook.

342 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An up-to-date overview of the CFOUR program system and its well-known capabilities for high-level coupled-cluster theory and its application to molecular properties is given.
Abstract: An up-to-date overview of the CFOUR program system is given. After providing a brief outline of the evolution of the program since its inception in 1989, a comprehensive presentation is given of its well-known capabilities for high-level coupled-cluster theory and its application to molecular properties. Subsequent to this generally well-known background information, much of the remaining content focuses on lesser-known capabilities of CFOUR, most of which have become available to the public only recently or will become available in the near future. Each of these new features is illustrated by a representative example, with additional discussion targeted to educating users as to classes of applications that are now enabled by these capabilities. Finally, some speculation about future directions is given, and the mode of distribution and support for CFOUR are outlined.

330 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a reliable procedure for calculating the electron affinity of an atom and present results for hydrogen, boron, carbon, oxygen, and fluorine (hydrogen is included for completeness).
Abstract: The calculation of accurate electron affinities (EAs) of atomic or molecular species is one of the most challenging tasks in quantum chemistry. We describe a reliable procedure for calculating the electron affinity of an atom and present results for hydrogen, boron, carbon, oxygen, and fluorine (hydrogen is included for completeness). This procedure involves the use of the recently proposed correlation‐consistent basis sets augmented with functions to describe the more diffuse character of the atomic anion coupled with a straightforward, uniform expansion of the reference space for multireference singles and doubles configuration‐interaction (MRSD‐CI) calculations. Comparison with previous results and with corresponding full CI calculations are given. The most accurate EAs obtained from the MRSD‐CI calculations are (with experimental values in parentheses) hydrogen 0.740 eV (0.754), boron 0.258 (0.277), carbon 1.245 (1.263), oxygen 1.384 (1.461), and fluorine 3.337 (3.401). The EAs obtained from the MR‐SD...

12,969 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The coupled cluster singles and doubles model (CCSD) as discussed by the authors is derived algebraically, presenting the full set of equations for a general reference function explicitly in spin-orbital form, and the computational implementation of the CCSD model, which involves cubic and quartic terms, is discussed and results are compared with full CI calculations for H2O and BeH2.
Abstract: The coupled‐cluster singles and doubles model (CCSD) is derived algebraically, presenting the full set of equations for a general reference function explicitly in spin–orbital form. The computational implementation of the CCSD model, which involves cubic and quartic terms, is discussed and results are reported and compared with full CI calculations for H2O and BeH2. We demonstrate that the CCSD exponential ansatz sums higher‐order correlation effects efficiently even for BeH2, near its transition state geometry where quasidegeneracy efforts are quite large, recovering 98% of the full CI correlation energy. For H2O, CCSD plus the fourth‐order triple excitation correction agrees with the full CI energy to 0.5 kcal/mol. Comparisons with low‐order models provide estimates of the effect of the higher‐order terms T1T2, T21T2, T31, and T41 on the correlation energy.

5,603 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a method for the calculation of the matrix elements of the logarithm of an operator which gives the exact wavefunction when operating on the wavefunction in the one-electron approximation is proposed.
Abstract: A method is suggested for the calculation of the matrix elements of the logarithm of an operator which gives the exact wavefunction when operating on the wavefunction in the one‐electron approximation. The method is based on the use of the creation and annihilation operators, hole—particle formalism, Wick's theorem, and the technique of Feynman‐like diagrams. The connection of this method with the configuration‐interaction method as well as with the perturbation theory in the quantum‐field theoretical form is discussed. The method is applied to the simple models of nitrogen and benzene molecules. The results are compared with those obtained with the configuration‐interaction method considering all possible configurations within the chosen basis of one‐electron functions.

2,676 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive overview of the equation of motion coupled-cluster (EOM•CC) method and its application to molecular systems is presented by exploiting the biorthogonal nature of the theory, it is shown that excited state properties and transition strengths can be evaluated via a generalized expectation value approach that incorporates both the bra and ket state wave functions.
Abstract: A comprehensive overview of the equation of motion coupled‐cluster (EOM‐CC) method and its application to molecular systems is presented. By exploiting the biorthogonal nature of the theory, it is shown that excited state properties and transition strengths can be evaluated via a generalized expectation value approach that incorporates both the bra and ket state wave functions. Reduced density matrices defined by this procedure are given by closed form expressions. For the root of the EOM‐CC effective Hamiltonian that corresponds to the ground state, the resulting equations are equivalent to the usual expressions for normal single‐reference CC density matrices. Thus, the method described in this paper provides a universal definition of coupled‐cluster density matrices, providing a link between EOM‐CC and traditional ground state CC theory.Excitation energy,oscillator strength, and property calculations are illustrated by means of several numerical examples, including comparisons with full configuration interaction calculations and a detailed study of the ten lowest electronically excited states of the cyclic isomer of C4.

2,171 citations