Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nanna B. Finnerup,Nadine Attal,Simon Haroutounian,Ewan D McNicol,Ralf Baron,Robert H. Dworkin,Ian Gilron,Maija Haanpää,Per Hansson,Per Hansson,Troels S. Jensen,Troels S. Jensen,Peter R. Kamerman,Karen Lund,Andrew Moore,Srinivasa N. Raja,Andrew S.C. Rice,Andrew S.C. Rice,Michael C. Rowbotham,Emily S. Sena,Emily S. Sena,Philip J. Siddall,Philip J. Siddall,Blair H. Smith,Mark S. Wallace +24 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The results support a revision of the NeuPSIG recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of neuropathic pain and allow a strong recommendation for use and proposal as first-line treatment in neuropathicPain for tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, pregabalin, and gabapentin.Abstract:
Summary Background New drug treatments, clinical trials, and standards of quality for assessment of evidence justify an update of evidence-based recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and E valuation (GRADE), we revised the Special Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain (NeuPSIG) recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of neuropathic pain based on the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Between April, 2013, and January, 2014, NeuPSIG of the International Association for the Study of Pain did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, double-blind studies of oral and topical pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain, including studies published in peer-reviewed journals since January , 1966, and unpublished trials retrieved from ClinicalTrials.gov and websites of pharmaceutical companies. We used number needed to treat (NNT) for 50% pain relief as a primary measure and assessed publication bias; NNT was calculated with the fi xed-eff ects Mantel-Haenszel method. Findings 229 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of publication bias suggested a 10% overstatement of treatment eff ects. Studies published in peer-reviewed journals reported greater eff ects than did unpublished studies (r² 9·3%, p=0·009). T rial outcomes were generally modest: in particular, combined NNTs were 6·4 (95% CI 5·2–8·4) for serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, mainly including duloxetine (nine of 14 studies); 7·7 (6·5–9·4) for pregabalin; 7·2 (5·9–9·21) for gabapentin, including gabapentin extended release and enacarbil; and 10·6 (7·4–19·0) for capsaicin high-concentration patches. NNTs were lower for tricyclic antidepressants, strong opioids, tramadol, and botulinum toxin A, and undetermined for lidocaine patches. Based on GRADE, fi nal quality of evidence was moderate or high for all treatments apart from lidocaine patches; tolerability and safety, and values and preferences were higher for topical drugs; and cost was lower for tricyclic antidepressants and tramadol. These fi ndings permitted a strong recommendation for use and proposal as fi rst-line treatment in neuropathic pain for tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, pregabalin, and gabapentin; a weak recommendation for use and proposal as second line for lidocaine patches, capsaicin high-concentration patches, and tramadol; and a weak recommendation for use and proposal as third line for strong opioids and botulinum toxin A. Topical agents and botulinum toxin A are recommended for peripheral neuropathic pain only. Interpretation Our results support a revision of the NeuPSIG recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of neuropathic pain. Inadequate response to drug treatments constitutes a substantial unmet need in patients with neuropathic pain. Modest effi cacy, large placebo responses, heterogeneous diagnostic criteria, and poor phenotypic profi ling probably account for moderate trial outcomes and should be taken into account in future studies. Funding NeuPSIG of the International Association for the Study of Pain.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Neuropatías, radiculopatías y plexopatías
TL;DR: Although the ideal treatment is etiological, only general and symptomatic care is possible in many cases (neuropathic pain drugs with different degree of efficiency).
Journal ArticleDOI
NRD.E1, an innovative non‐opioid therapy for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy—A randomized proof of concept study
Eva Tiecke,Maurizio Rainisio,Elon Eisenberg,Julio Wainstein,Eli Kaplan,Michal Silverberg,L. Hochman,Sara Mangialaio +7 more
TL;DR: NDR.E1 is a novel product that has shown anti‐nociceptive preclinical effects and good tolerability in healthy volunteer studies and is being developed as a potential treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Pharmacologic targeting of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor for application in centrally-mediated chronic pain
TL;DR: ......................................................................... iii Lay Summary ...................................................................................................................................v Preface............................................................................................................................................ vi Table of
Journal ArticleDOI
Pregabalin and amitriptyline as monotherapy or as low-dose combination in patients of neuropathic pain: A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety in an Eastern India teaching hospital
TL;DR: Combining pregabalin and amitriptyline at low doses at high doses proved to be equally effective but more tolerable compared to individual higher dosage monotherapy, but if tolerability is good, amitripyline monotherapy can be an attractive choice in economically challenged group of patients.
Journal ArticleDOI
Trigeminal neuralgia and the merit of small clinical trials
TL;DR: In this article , a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study was conducted in patients with trigeminal neuralgia and showed that Erenumab did not reduce pain intensity compared with placebo in patients.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
TL;DR: Funnel plots, plots of the trials' effect estimates against sample size, are skewed and asymmetrical in the presence of publication bias and other biases Funnel plot asymmetry, measured by regression analysis, predicts discordance of results when meta-analyses are compared with single large trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary?
Alejandro R. Jadad,R. A. Moore,Dawn Carroll,C. Jenkinson,David Reynolds,David J. Gavaghan,Henry J McQuay +6 more
TL;DR: An instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research is described and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality is described.
Journal ArticleDOI
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Regina Kunz,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Holger J. Schünemann +6 more
TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.