Phase separation in transcription factor dynamics and chromatin organization.
TL;DR: In this paper, theoretical and experimental evidence for biomolecular condensates as dynamic regulators of transcription has been discussed and functional consequences for transcription factor dynamics and gene expression are discussed.
About: This article is published in Current Opinion in Structural Biology.The article was published on 2021-07-22. It has received 18 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Super-enhancer & Transcription factor.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: A review of protein aggregation in biological systems can be found in this article, where the authors highlight the emerging roles of biomolecular condensates in early animal development, and disaggregation processing proteins that have recently been shown to play key roles in gametogenesis and embryogenesis.
10 citations
TL;DR: A review of the chemical features of TF IDRs that endow them with structural plasticity that is central to their functions in the nucleus is presented in this article . But this review is limited to a set of eukaryotic transcription factors.
Abstract: Eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) are the final integrators of a complex molecular feedback mechanism that interfaces with the genome, consolidating information for transcriptional regulation. TFs consist of both structured DNA-binding domains and long intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) embedded with motifs linked to transcriptional control. It is now well established that the dynamic multifunctionality of IDRs is the basis for a wide spectrum of TF functions necessary to navigate and regulate the human genome. This review dissects the chemical features of TF IDRs that endow them with structural plasticity that is central to their functions in the nucleus. Sequence analysis of a set of over 1600 human TFs through AlphaFold was used to identify key features of their IDRs. Recent studies were then highlighted to illustrate IDR involvement in processes such as protein interactions, DNA binding and specificity, chromatin opening, and phase separation. To expand our understanding of TF functions, future directions are suggested for integrating experiments and simulations, from in vitro to living systems.
4 citations
TL;DR: In this paper , the TGFβ pathway coactivator JMJD3 was found to be essential to maintain the 3D-conformation of the chromatin and the response during mammalian neurogenesis.
Abstract: Enhancers are key regulatory elements that govern gene expression programs in response to developmental signals. However, how multiple enhancers arrange in the 3D-space to control the activation of a specific promoter remains unclear. To address this question, we exploited our previously characterized TGFβ-response model, the neural stem cells, focusing on a ~374 kb locus where enhancers abound. Our 4C-seq experiments reveal that the TGFβ pathway drives the assembly of an enhancer-cluster and precise gene activation. We discover that the TGFβ pathway coactivator JMJD3 is essential to maintain these structures. Using live-cell imaging techniques, we demonstrate that an intrinsically disordered region contained in JMJD3 is involved in the formation of phase-separated biomolecular condensates, which are found in the enhancer-cluster. Overall, in this work we uncover novel functions for the coactivator JMJD3, and we shed light on the relationships between the 3D-conformation of the chromatin and the TGFβ-driven response during mammalian neurogenesis.
4 citations
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors integrated the transcriptome information of 3585 LLPS-related genes to comprehensively evaluate the LLPS patterns of 423 patients with LGG in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort.
Abstract: Emerging evidences have indicated that the aberrant liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) leads to the dysfunction of biomolecular condensates, thereby contributing to the tumorigenesis and progression. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether or how the LLPS of specific molecules affects the prognosis and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of patients with lower-grade glioma (LGG).We integrated the transcriptome information of 3585 LLPS-related genes to comprehensively evaluate the LLPS patterns of 423 patients with LGG in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. Then, we systematically demonstrated the differences among four LLPS subtypes based on multi-omics analyses. In addition, we constructed the LLPS-related prognostic risk score (LPRS) for individualized integrative assessment.Based on the expression profiles of 85 scaffolds, 355 regulators, and 3145 clients in LGG, we identified four LLPS subtypes, namely LS1, LS2, LS3 and LS4. We confirmed that there were significant differences in prognosis, clinicopathological features, cancer hallmarks, genomic alterations, TIME patterns and immunotherapeutic responses among four LLPS subtypes. In addition, a prognostic signature called LPRS was constructed for individualized integrative assessment. LPRS exhibited a robust predictive capacity for prognosis of LGG patients in multiple cohorts. Moreover, LPRS was found to be correlated with clinicopathological features, cancer hallmarks, genomic alterations and TIME patterns of LGG patients. The predictive power of LPRS in response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy was also prominent.This study provided a novel classification of LGG patients based on LLPS. The constructed LPRS might facilitate individualized prognosis prediction and better immunotherapy options for LGG patients.
4 citations
TL;DR: A review of different classes of transcription regulators with the propensity to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation and stress the role of intrinsically disordered regions in this phenomenon can be found in this paper.
Abstract: Eukaryotic cells are composed of different bio-macromolecules that are divided into compartments called organelles providing optimal microenvironments for many cellular processes. A specific type of organelles is membraneless organelles. They are formed via a process called liquid–liquid phase separation that is driven by weak multivalent interactions between particular bio-macromolecules. In this review, we gather crucial information regarding different classes of transcription regulators with the propensity to undergo liquid–liquid phase separation and stress the role of intrinsically disordered regions in this phenomenon. We also discuss recently developed experimental systems for studying formation and properties of membraneless organelles.
3 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: The findings together suggest that several membrane-less organelles have been shown to exhibit a concentration threshold for assembly, a hallmark of phase separation, and represent liquid-phase condensates, which form via a biologically regulated (liquid-liquid) phase separation process.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Living cells contain distinct subcompartments to facilitate spatiotemporal regulation of biological reactions. In addition to canonical membrane-bound organelles such as secretory vesicles and endoplasmic reticulum, there are many organelles that do not have an enclosing membrane yet remain coherent structures that can compartmentalize and concentrate specific sets of molecules. Examples include assemblies in the nucleus such as the nucleolus, Cajal bodies, and nuclear speckles and also cytoplasmic structures such as stress granules, P-bodies, and germ granules. These structures play diverse roles in various biological processes and are also increasingly implicated in protein aggregation diseases. ADVANCES A number of studies have shown that membrane-less assemblies exhibit remarkable liquid-like features. As with conventional liquids, they typically adopt round morphologies and coalesce into a single droplet upon contact with one another and also wet intracellular surfaces such as the nuclear envelope. Moreover, component molecules exhibit dynamic exchange with the surrounding nucleoplasm and cytoplasm. These findings together suggest that these structures represent liquid-phase condensates, which form via a biologically regulated (liquid-liquid) phase separation process. Liquid phase condensation increasingly appears to be a fundamental mechanism for organizing intracellular space. Consistent with this concept, several membrane-less organelles have been shown to exhibit a concentration threshold for assembly, a hallmark of phase separation. At the molecular level, weak, transient interactions between molecules with multivalent domains or intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are a driving force for phase separation. In cells, condensation of liquid-phase assemblies can be regulated by active processes, including transcription and various posttranslational modifications. The simplest physical picture of a homogeneous liquid phase is often not enough to capture the full complexity of intracellular condensates, which frequently exhibit heterogeneous multilayered structures with partially solid-like characters. However, recent studies have shown that multiple distinct liquid phases can coexist and give rise to richly structured droplet architectures determined by the relative liquid surface tensions. Moreover, solid-like phases can emerge from metastable liquid condensates via multiple routes of potentially both kinetic and thermodynamic origins, which has important implications for the role of intracellular liquids in protein aggregation pathologies. OUTLOOK The list of intracellular assemblies driven by liquid phase condensation is growing rapidly, but our understanding of their sequence-encoded biological function and dysfunction lags behind. Moreover, unlike equilibrium phases of nonliving matter, living cells are far from equilibrium, with intracellular condensates subject to various posttranslational regulation and other adenosine triphosphate–dependent biological activity. Efforts using in vitro reconstitution, combined with traditional cell biology approaches and quantitative biophysical tools, are required to elucidate how such nonequilibrium features of living cells control intracellular phase behavior. The functional consequences of forming liquid condensates are likely multifaceted and may include facilitated reaction, sequestration of specific factors, and organization of associated intracellular structures. Liquid phase condensation is particularly interesting in the nucleus, given the growing interest in the impact of nuclear phase behavior on the flow of genetic information; nuclear condensates range from micrometer-sized bodies such as the nucleolus to submicrometer structures such as transcriptional assemblies, all of which directly interact with and regulate the genome. Deepening our understanding of these intracellular states of matter not only will shed light on the basic biology of cellular organization but also may enable therapeutic intervention in protein aggregation disease by targeting intracellular phase behavior.
2,432 citations
TL;DR: It is shown that P granules exhibit liquid-like behaviors, including fusion, dripping, and wetting, which is used to estimate their viscosity and surface tension, and reflects a classic phase transition, in which polarity proteins vary the condensation point across the cell.
Abstract: In sexually reproducing organisms, embryos specify germ cells, which ultimately generate sperm and eggs In Caenorhabditis elegans, the first germ cell is established when RNA and protein-rich P granules localize to the posterior of the one-cell embryo Localization of P granules and their physical nature remain poorly understood Here we show that P granules exhibit liquid-like behaviors, including fusion, dripping, and wetting, which we used to estimate their viscosity and surface tension As with other liquids, P granules rapidly dissolved and condensed Localization occurred by a biased increase in P granule condensation at the posterior This process reflects a classic phase transition, in which polarity proteins vary the condensation point across the cell Such phase transitions may represent a fundamental physicochemical mechanism for structuring the cytoplasm
2,134 citations
TL;DR: This review considers how TFs are identified and functionally characterized, principally through the lens of a catalog of over 1,600 likely human TFs and binding motifs for two-thirds of them, highlighting the importance of continued effort to understand TF-mediated gene regulation.
1,833 citations
TL;DR: It is discovered that exposure of cell or tissue lysates to a biotinylated isoxazole (b-isox) chemical precipitated hundreds of RNA-binding proteins with significant overlap to the constituents of RNA granules, offering a framework for understanding the function of LC sequences as well as an organizing principle for cellular structures that are not membrane bound.
1,703 citations
TL;DR: It is postulated that super-enhancers are phase-separated multimolecular assemblies, also known as biomolecular condensates, which provide a means to compartmentalize and concentrate biochemical reactions within cells.
Abstract: Super-enhancers (SEs) are clusters of enhancers that cooperatively assemble a high density of transcriptional apparatus to drive robust expression of genes with prominent roles in cell identity. Here, we demonstrate that the SE-enriched transcriptional coactivators BRD4 and MED1 form nuclear puncta at SEs that exhibit properties of liquid-like condensates and are disrupted by chemicals that perturb condensates. The intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of BRD4 and MED1 can form phase-separated droplets and MED1-IDR droplets can compartmentalize and concentrate transcription apparatus from nuclear extracts. These results support the idea that coactivators form phase-separated condensates at SEs that compartmentalize and concentrate the transcription apparatus, suggest a role for coactivator IDRs in this process, and offer insights into mechanisms involved in control of key cell identity genes.
1,506 citations