Dissertation•
Pine Weevil Feeding Behaviour in Relation to Conifer Plant Properties
01 Jan 2014-
TL;DR: The results from a no-choice and a choice experiment indicate that the protective effect of MeJA-induced defences is, besides an overall reduction of feeding, mainly due to the reduced amount that a pine weevil can feed at one place.
Abstract: The pine weevil (Hylobius abietis (L.)) is a forest insect distributed over the Palearctic region. The adults feed on the phloem of young conifer plants causing high economic losses for the European forest industry. Still, there is very little knowledge about the structure of its feeding behaviour. Feeding behaviour can be studied in several different temporal resolutions, from differences in feeding after several weeks to diel patterns and short-term feeding, i.e. feeding patterns at the level of feeding events and meals. The aim of this thesis was to increase the knowledge about the pine weevils’ feeding patterns and the underlying behavioural mechanisms.
I studied the pine weevils’ time budget and diel behaviour as well as its short-term feeding behaviour based on video recordings. In addition, I assessed how changes in plant properties due to girdling or induction of plant defences with a chemical elicitor, methyl jasmonate (MeJA), affect the feeding pattern and preferences of the pine weevil.
Pine weevils allocated only 6 % of the time to feeding. Most of the time was spent away from the plant (70 – 80 %). Damaged plants appeared to attract the weevils because they spent more time while not feeding on damaged plants than on undamaged plants. Feeding behaviour was mostly concentrated to the second half of the dark phase, after a peak of locomotion behaviour during the first part of the dark phase. During the light phase, pine weevils mostly rested. Analysis of the short-term feeding behaviour showed that pine weevils made 4-5 meals per day, removing about 13 mm2 during about 24 minutes in each meal. Some of the feeding properties, such as how much time was spent not feeding during a meal, differed between male and female weevils. Girdling did not affect the time budget or feeding properties.
The induced plant defences with MeJA caused a reduction in meal duration. When meals consisting of only phloem, only needles or both were compared, the meal duration and the time until the initiation of a meal were more similar between the different meal contents on induced plants. In addition, the results from a no-choice and a choice experiment indicate that the protective effect of MeJA-induced defences is, besides an overall reduction of feeding, mainly due to the reduced amount that a pine weevil can feed at one place. Thus the risk of girdling and death of the plant is reduced.
References
More filters
TL;DR: Several hypotheses, mainly Optimal Defense, Carbon:Nutrient Balance, Growth Rate, and Growth‐Differentiation Balance, have individually served as frameworks for investigating the patterns of plant defense against herbivores, in particular the pattern of constitutive defense.
Abstract: Several hypotheses, mainly Optimal Defense (OD), Carbon:Nutrient Balance (CNB), Growth Rate (GR), and Growth‐Differentiation Balance (GDB), have individually served as frameworks for investigating the patterns of plant defense against herbivores, in particular the pattern of constitutive defense. The predictions and tests of these hypotheses have been problematic for a variety of reasons and have led to considerable confusion about the state of the “theory of plant defense.” The primary contribution of the OD hypothesis is that it has served as the main framework for investigation of genotypic expression of plant defense, with the emphasis on allocation cost of defense. The primary contribution of the CNB hypothesis is that it has served as the main framework for investigation of how resources affect phenotypic expression of plant defense, often with studies concerned about allocation cost of defense. The primary contribution of the GR hypothesis is that it explains how intrinsic growth rate of p...
1,101 citations
"Pine Weevil Feeding Behaviour in Re..." refers background in this paper
...According to the optimal defence theory, the most important or most often attacked tissues should have the best defences (Stamp, 2003)....
[...]
TL;DR: This review focuses on bark defenses, a front line against organisms trying to reach the nutrient-rich phloem, and questions about their coevolution with bark beetles are discussed.
Abstract: Conifers are long-lived organisms, and part of their success is due to their potent defense mechanisms. This review focuses on bark defenses, a front line against organisms trying to reach the nutrient-rich phloem. A major breach of the bark can lead to tree death, as evidenced by the millions of trees killed every year by specialized bark-invading insects. Different defense strategies have arisen in conifer lineages, but the general strategy is one of overlapping constitutive mechanical and chemical defenses overlaid with the capacity to up-regulate additional defenses. The defense strategy incorporates a graded response from 'repel', through 'defend' and 'kill', to 'compartmentalize', depending upon the advance of the invading organism. Using a combination of toxic and polymer chemistry, anatomical structures and their placement, and inducible defenses, conifers have evolved bark defense mechanisms that work against a variety of pests. However, these can be overcome by strategies including aggregation pheromones of bark beetles and introduction of virulent phytopathogens. The defense structures and chemicals in conifer bark are reviewed and questions about their coevolution with bark beetles are discussed.
929 citations
"Pine Weevil Feeding Behaviour in Re..." refers background in this paper
...The defence systems of conifers consist of the constitutive defence, which is always present, and the induced defence, which is only expressed during an attack (Franceschi et al., 2005; Eyles et al., 2010)....
[...]
TL;DR: The major MeJA-induced volatile terpenes appear to be synthesized de novo after treatment, rather than being released from stored terPene pools, because they are almost completely absent from needle oleoresin and are the major products of terpene synthase activity measured after MeJA treatment.
Abstract: Terpenoids are characteristic constitutive and inducible defense chemicals of conifers. The biochemical regulation of terpene formation, accumulation, and release from conifer needles was studied in Norway spruce [ Picea abies L. (Karst)] saplings using methyl jasmonate (MeJA) to induce defensive responses without inflicting physical damage to terpene storage structures. MeJA treatment caused a 2-fold increase in monoterpene and sesquiterpene accumulation in needles without changes in terpene composition, much less than the 10- and 40-fold increases in monoterpenes and diterpenes, respectively, observed in wood tissue after MeJA treatment (D. Martin, D. Tholl, J. Gershenzon, J. Bohlmann [2002] Plant Physiol 129: 1003–1018). At the same time, MeJA triggered a 5-fold increase in total terpene emission from foliage, with a shift in composition to a blend dominated by oxygenated monoterpenes (e.g. linalool) and sesquiterpenes [e.g. ( E )-β-farnesene] that also included methyl salicylate. The rate of linalool emission increased more than 100-fold and that of sesquiterpenes increased more than 30-fold. Emission of these compounds followed a pronounced diurnal rhythm with the maximum amount released during the light period. The major MeJA-induced volatile terpenes appear to be synthesized de novo after treatment, rather than being released from stored terpene pools, because they are almost completely absent from needle oleoresin and are the major products of terpene synthase activity measured after MeJA treatment. Based on precedents in other species, the induced emission of terpenes from Norway spruce foliage may have ecological and physiological significance.
417 citations
"Pine Weevil Feeding Behaviour in Re..." refers background in this paper
...Damages to plants generally change the chemical composition of the stem tissue as well as the emitted volatiles (Gref & Ericsson, 1985; Martin et al., 2003)....
[...]
TL;DR: Overall, weevils and MeJA induced similar, but not identical, terpenoid defense responses in Sitka spruce, with increased levels of weevil- and Me JA-induced TPS transcripts accompanied major changes in terpenoids accumulation in stems.
Abstract: Stem-boring insects and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) are thought to induce similar complex chemical and anatomical defenses in conifers. To compare insect- and MeJA-induced terpenoid responses, we analyzed traumatic oleoresin mixtures, emissions of terpenoid volatiles, and expression of terpenoid synthase (TPS) genes in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) following attack by white pine weevils (Pissodes strobi) or application of MeJA. Both insects and MeJA caused traumatic resin accumulation in stems, with more accumulation induced by the weevils. Weevil-induced terpenoid emission profiles were also more complex than emissions induced by MeJA. Weevil feeding caused a rapid release of a blend of monoterpene olefins, presumably by passive evaporation of resin compounds from stem feeding sites. These compounds were not found in MeJA-induced emissions. Both weevils and MeJA caused delayed, diurnal emissions of (-)-linalool, indicating induced de novo biosynthesis of this compound. TPS transcripts strongly increased in stems upon insect attack or MeJA treatment. Time courses and intensity of induced TPS transcripts were different for monoterpene synthases, sesquiterpene synthases, and diterpene synthases. Increased levels of weevil- and MeJA-induced TPS transcripts accompanied major changes in terpenoid accumulation in stems. Induced TPS expression profiles in needles were less complex than those in stems and matched induced de novo emissions of (-)-linalool. Overall, weevils and MeJA induced similar, but not identical, terpenoid defense responses in Sitka spruce. Findings of insect- and MeJA-induced accumulation of allene oxide synthase-like and allene oxide cyclase-like transcripts are discussed in the context of traumatic resinosis and induced volatile emissions in this gymnosperm system.
287 citations
TL;DR: This review summarizes the current knowledge of IR in forest trees, focusing on inducible defence mechanisms, systemic induction of resistance and phytohormone signalling networks, and the potential advantages and limitations of applying IR-based management tools in forest systems.
Abstract: Tree resistance can be enhanced by a variety of biotic and abiotic inducers, including nonpathogenic and pathogenic microbes, and herbivores, resulting in enhanced protection against further biotic injury. Induced resistance (IR) could be a valuable tool in sustainable pest management. IR has been actively studied in herbaceous plant species, and, in recent years, in woody plant species, and is fast emerging as an intriguing, eco-friendly concept for enhancing tree resistance. However, before application of IR becomes possible, there is a need to increase our knowledge of the mechanisms of defence in forest trees. A richer understanding of these phenomena will play a critical role in developing sustainable integrated pest management strategies. This review summarizes our current knowledge of IR in forest trees, focusing on inducible defence mechanisms, systemic induction of resistance and phytohormone signalling networks. We conclude by discussing the potential advantages and limitations of applying IR-based management tools in forest systems.
267 citations
"Pine Weevil Feeding Behaviour in Re..." refers background in this paper
...The defence systems of conifers consist of the constitutive defence, which is always present, and the induced defence, which is only expressed during an attack (Franceschi et al., 2005; Eyles et al., 2010)....
[...]