Planning for district mental health services in South Africa: a situational analysis of a rural district site
TL;DR: It is suggested that, in a similar vein to other low- to middle-income countries, deinstitutionalization and comprehensive integrated mental health care in South Africa is hampered by a lack of resources for mentally health care within the primary health care resource package, as well as the inefficient use of existing mental health resources.
Abstract: The shift in emphasis to universal primary health care in post-apartheid South Africa has been accompanied by a process of decentralization of mental health services to district level, as set out in the new Mental Health Care Act, no. 17, of 2002 and the 1997 White Paper on the Transformation of the Health System. This study sought to assess progress in South Africa with respect to deinstitutionalization and the integration of mental health into primary health care, with a view to understanding the resource implications of these processes at district level. A situational analysis in one district site, typical of rural areas in South Africa, was conducted, based on qualitative interviews with key stakeholders and the World Health Organization's Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS). The findings suggest that the decentralization process remains largely limited to emergency management of psychiatric patients and ongoing psychopharmacological care of patients with stabilized chronic conditions. We suggest that, in a similar vein to other low- to middle-income countries, deinstitutionalization and comprehensive integrated mental health care in South Africa is hampered by a lack of resources for mental health care within the primary health care resource package, as well as the inefficient use of existing mental health resources.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: Improved nurses' education in gerontology and geriatric care is needed and trained specialist nurses may work as mediators and help eradicate the witchcraft beliefs connected to severe dementia.
Abstract: Objective
To explore and describe the link between culture and dementia care with the focus on the influence of the belief in dementia as witchcraft and people with dementia as witches
Background
In South Africa, especially in townships and rural areas, dementia is often perceived as connected to witchcraft rather than to disease Persons labelled as witches – mostly elderly women – may be bullied, ostracised, beaten, stoned, burned, even killed
Method
One strand of findings from a larger international study is presented with in-depth qualitative interviews of one close family member and seven nurses caring for patients with severe dementia in nursing homes in Tshwane in South Africa A hermeneutic analytic approach was used
Results
Two main themes are found, namely “Belief in witchcraft causing fear of persons with dementia” and “Need of knowledge and education” Fear of and violence towards people with dementia are based on the belief that they are witches Some of the nurses had also held this belief until they started working with patients with dementia There is a great need for education both among healthcare workers and the populace
Discussion
The ‘witch’ belief prevents seeking professional help As nursing homes tend to be private and expensive, professional dementia care is virtually unattainable for the poor Dementia needs a more prominent place in nursing curricula Nurses as educators need to know the local culture and language to be accepted in the various communities They need to visit families affected by dementia, give awareness talks in churches, schools and clinics and facilitate support groups for carers of people with dementia in the local language
Conclusion
Improved nurses’ education in gerontology and geriatric care is needed Trained specialist nurses may work as mediators, and help eradicate the witchcraft beliefs connected to severe dementia
This article is protected by copyright All rights reserved
40 citations
TL;DR: From this review, strengths and gaps in existing micro- and community-level evidence-based mental health promotion interventions as well as macro-policy-level initiatives are identified, and recommendations made for South Africa that may also have applicability for other LMICs.
Abstract: In order to achieve sustainable development and a consequent reduction in levels of poverty, a multisectoral response to development incorporating pro-poor economic policies in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) is required. An important aspect is strengthening the human capital asset base of vulnerable populations. This should include the promotion of mental health, which can play an important role in breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty and mental ill-health through promoting positive mental health outcomes within the context of risk. For each developmental phase of early childhood, middle childhood and adolescence, this article provides: (i) an overview of the critical risk influences and evidence of the role of mental health promotion initiatives in mediating these influences; (ii) a background to these risk influences in South Africa; and (iii) a review of mental health promotion initiatives addressing distal upstream influences at a macro-policy level in South Africa, as well as evidence-based micro- and community-level interventions that have the potential to be scaled up. From this review, strengths and gaps in existing micro- and community-level evidence-based mental health promotion interventions as well as macro-policy-level initiatives are identified, and recommendations made for South Africa that may also have applicability for other LMICs.
37 citations
Cites background from "Planning for district mental health..."
...…supported community-based workers for scaling up the care and treatment of people with mental disorders in South Africa and other LMICs (Saraceno et al., 2007; Petersen et al., 2009b), these studies hold promise that mental health promotion interventions can be similarly scaled up at minimal cost....
[...]
...It has recently been adapted to support caregivers of HIVþ children, who are often foster parents (Petersen et al., 2009a)....
[...]
TL;DR: To develop and facilitate effective primary care mental health services in a post-conflict, low resource setting will require addressing the knowledge and clinical skills gap in the primary care workforce and implementing concurrent interventions designed to improve attitudes towards people with mental illness, their family members and mental health care providers.
Abstract: There are increasing efforts and attention focused on the delivery of mental health services in primary care in low resource settings (e.g., mental health Gap Action Programme, mhGAP). However, less attention is devoted to systematic approaches that identify and address barriers to the development and uptake of mental health services within primary care in low-resource settings. Our objective was to prepare for optimal uptake by identifying barriers in rural Liberia. The country’s need for mental health services is compounded by a 14-year history of political violence and the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak in history. Both events have immediate and lasting mental health effects. A mixed-methods approach was employed, consisting of qualitative interviews with 22 key informants and six focus group discussions. Additional qualitative data as well as quantitative data were collected through semi-structured assessments of 19 rural primary care health facilities. Data were collected from March 2013 to March 2014. Potential barriers to development and uptake of mental health services included lack of mental health knowledge among primary health care staff; high workload for primary health care workers precluding addition of mental health responsibilities; lack of mental health drugs; poor physical infrastructure of health facilities including lack of space for confidential consultation; poor communication support including lack of electricity and mobile phone networks that prevent referrals and phone consultation with supervisors; absence of transportation for patients to facilitate referrals; negative attitudes and stigma towards people with severe mental disorders and their family members; and stigma against mental health workers. To develop and facilitate effective primary care mental health services in a post-conflict, low resource setting will require (1) addressing the knowledge and clinical skills gap in the primary care workforce; (2) improving physical infrastructure of health facilities at care delivery points; and (3) implementing concurrent interventions designed to improve attitudes towards people with mental illness, their family members and mental health care providers.
35 citations
Cites background from "Planning for district mental health..."
...The integration of mental health care into primary healthcare services in South Africa saw many general health care providers being exposed to patients with mental disorders and reported a high level of stigma and discrimination amongst general health care workers [30]....
[...]
TL;DR: Although 'designated' hospitals admit and treat assisted and involuntary MHCUs, they do so against a backdrop of inadequate infrastructure and staff, a high administrative load, and a low level of contact with Review Boards.
Abstract: Background. The South African Mental Health Care Act (the Act) No. 17 of 2002 stipulated that regional and district hospitals be designated to admit, observe and treat mental health care users (MHCUs) for 72 hours before they are transferred to a psychiatric hospital. Methods. Medical managers in 49 ‘designated’ hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) were surveyed on infrastructure, staffing, administrative requirements and mental health care user case load pertaining to the Act for the month of July 2009. Results. Thirty-six (73.4%) hospitals responded to the survey; 30 (83.3%) stated that the Act improved mental health care for MHCUs through the protection of their rights, provision of least restrictive care, and reduction of discrimination; 10 (27.8%) had a psychiatric unit and, of the remaining 26 hospitals, 11 (30.6%) had general ward beds dedicated for psychiatric admissions; 16 (44.4%) had some form of seclusion facility; and 24 (66.7%) provided an outpatient psychiatric service. Seventy-six per cent of admissions were involuntary or assisted. Thirteen of the 32 (40.6%) state psychiatrists in KZN were employed at 8 of these hospitals. Designated hospitals expressed dissatisfaction with the substantial administrative load required by the Act. The Review Board had not visited 29 (80.6%) hospitals in the preceding 6 months. Conclusion. Although ‘designated’ hospitals admit and treat assisted and involuntary MHCUs, they do so against a backdrop of inadequate infrastructure and staff, a high administrative load, and a low level of contact with Review Boards.
34 citations
TL;DR: In the last few years, some positive developments have emerged in terms of policy recognition for mental health, as well as the increased presence of NGOs,Increased presence of service users or caregivers in mental health governance, albeit restricted to only some of its domains.
Abstract: Assessing and understanding health systems governance is crucial to ensure accountability and transparency, and to improve the performance of mental health systems. There is a lack of systematic procedures to assess governance in mental health systems at a country level. The aim of this study was to appraise mental health systems governance in Nepal, with the view to making recommendations for improvements. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with national-level policymakers (n = 17) and district-level planners (n = 11). The interview checklist was developed using an existing health systems governance framework developed by Siddiqi and colleagues as a guide. Data analysis was done with NVivo 10, using the procedure of framework analysis. The mental health systems governance assessment reveals a few enabling factors and many barriers. Factors enabling good governance include availability of mental health policy, inclusion of mental health in other general health policies and plans, increasing presence of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and service user organizations in policy forums, and implementation of a few mental health projects through government-NGO collaborations. Legal and policy barriers include the failure to officially revise or fully implement the mental health policy of 1996, the existence of legislation and several laws that have discriminatory provisions for people with mental illness, and lack of a mental health act and associated regulations to protect against this. Other barriers include lack of a mental health unit within the Ministry of Health, absence of district-level mental health planning, inadequate mental health record-keeping systems, inequitable allocation of funding for mental health, very few health workers trained in mental health, and the lack of availability of psychotropic drugs at the primary health care level. In the last few years, some positive developments have emerged in terms of policy recognition for mental health, as well as the increased presence of NGOs, increased presence of service users or caregivers in mental health governance, albeit restricted to only some of its domains. However, the improvements at the policy level have not been translated into implementation due to lack of strong leadership and governance mechanisms.
25 citations
Cites background from "Planning for district mental health..."
...Also, a greater emphasis on community mental health programs can help to deinstitutionalize mental health care [28] and increase awareness among community members, thereby helping to reduce stigma related to mental illness....
[...]
References
More filters
09 Sep 2002
TL;DR: The last two decades have seen a notable growth in the use of qualitative methods for applied social policy research as discussed by the authors, which is underpinned by the persistent requirement in social policy fields to understand complex behaviours, needs, systems and cultures.
Abstract: The last two decades have seen a notable growth in the use of qualitative methods
for applied social policy research. Qualitative research is now used to explore
and understand a diversity of social and public policy issues, either as an
independent research strategy or in combination with some form of statistical
inquiry. The wider use of qualitative methods has come about for a number of
reasons but is underpinned by the persistent requirement in social policy fields
to understand complex behaviours, needs, systems and cultures.
7,396 citations
"Planning for district mental health..." refers methods in this paper
...A framework analysis approach (Ritchie and Spencer 1994) was used to analyse the qualitative data....
[...]
...Framework analysis was specifically developed for qualitative data analysis in applied policy analysis research (Ritchie and Spencer 1994; Lacey and Luff 2001)....
[...]
01 Jan 2007
TL;DR: The Nature of Qualitative Analysis Data Preparation Writing Thematic Coding and Categorizing Analysing Biographies and Narratives Comparative Analysis Analytic Quality and Ethics Getting Started with Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Searching and Other Analytic Activities Using Software Putting it All Together.
Abstract: The Nature of Qualitative Analysis Data Preparation Writing Thematic Coding and Categorizing Analysing Biographies and Narratives Comparative Analysis Analytic Quality and Ethics Getting Started with Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Searching and Other Analytic Activities Using Software Putting it All Together
3,790 citations
TL;DR: Every country can and should begin now to improve its efforts to treat people with mental illness, and 10 recommendations on how governments can strengthen their country’s mental health care are concluded.
Abstract: As I write these words in mid October I reflect on the way in which we have, during the past 4 weeks, expressed our shared grief in understanding, sympathy, and support for those affected by posttraumatic stress. We are reminded of the extraordinary ability of humans tocopewithextremesofemotion,tohelp each other, and to handle fear, pain, and loss. We work together to preserve our mental health. We see nothing wrong, or mysterious, in our coping mechanisms. But we do not expect people to have to cope alone, in isolation. We understandtheneedforhelpandguidance. As health care professionals, we know that mental illness is not a personal failure. If there is failure, it is in the way society in general and the health sector in particular have responded to people with mental and neurological disorders. By separating mental health care from physical health care—and often separating those who have mental illness from society—the health care profession has reinforced stigma, making successful treatment much harder. I see this as a time of opportunity for change, and I agree strongly with an earlier JOURNAL article by US Surgeon General David Satcher ( JAMA. 2001; 285:1697). Every country can and should begin now to improve its efforts to treat people with mental illness. A recent WHO global survey of mental health policy issues, Atlas of Mental HealthResources in theWorld2001 (http:// www.who.int/mental health/Publication Pages/Pubs 2001.html), found that 40% of the 185 countries surveyed have no national mental health policy, 30% have no programs to improve mental health conditions, and 25% have no specific mental health legislation. Well over one third (37%) of the countries have no community care facilities. The global toll of mental illness and neurological disorders is staggering. Neuropsychiatric disorders account for 31% of the disability in the world— and they affect rich and poor nations and individuals alike. According to the World Health Report 2001, Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope (http://www.who.int/whr/), 450 million people have a mental or neurological disorder. Of these, 121 million have depression and 50 million have epilepsy. Every year, 1 million people commit suicide and 10 million to 20 million attempt suicide. A great deal of this suffering is unnecessary. We know, for instance, that 60% of those with major depression can fully recover if treated. However, in both industrialized and developing countries, less than 25% of those affected receive treatment, for reasons that include stigma, discrimination, scarce resources, lack of skills in primary health care, and deficient public health policies. The treatment gap is similar or greater for many other easily treatable mental and neurological disorders. Because people do not get the care they need, these disorders impose a range of social and economic costs on individuals, households, employers, and society, ranging from the cost of care to the cost of lost productivity. Solutions based on scientific evidence are available and affordable. Through recent advances in neuroscience, neuroimaging, genetics, and behavioral sciences, we know more about brain functioning and behavior than ever before. Breakthroughs in therapy and medication have occurred. In the World Health Report 2001, WHO summarizes current knowledge about mental and neurological disorders: the global burden, current level of care, latest knowledge about causes and treatment, and ongoing efforts to reform mental health care. The report concludes with 10 recommendations on how governments can strengthen their country’s mental health care: • provide treatment for mental disorders within primary care; • ensure that psychotropic drugs are available; • replace large custodial hospitals with community care facilities backed by general hospital psychiatric beds and home care support; • launch public awareness campaigns to overcome stigma and discrimination; • involve communities, families, and consumers in decision making on policies and services; • establish national policies, programs, and legislation; • train mental health professionals; • link mental health with other social sectors; • monitor community mental health; and • support more research. The report outlines three scenarios to help guide countries and population groups, depending on the resources available and the current status of mental health care in each country. Regarding treatment, for example, if even the poorest countries could ensure that the five most needed psychotropic drugs were available in all health care settings, we could ease the suffering of millions of people. If many middle-income countries could use the experiences of others as a guide and initiate pilot projects for community care, parts of or entire custodial institutions could be shut down, and the financial savings could strengthen further community care activities. If some of the richest countries could review their health care financing rules to ensure parity between mental and physical health problems, a major obstacle to treatment could be removed. We need to speed up and strengthen care for the mentally ill. —Gro Harlem Brundtland, MD, MPH Director-General World Health Organization FROM THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
1,683 citations
TL;DR: The third in the Child Development Series as discussed by the authors assesses strategies to promote child development and to prevent or ameliorate the loss of developmental potential in developing countries by identifying four well-documented risks: stunting, iodine deficiency, iron deficiency anaemia, and inadequate cognitive stimulation, plus four potential risks based on epidemiological evidence.
927 citations