scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Polypharmacy among anabolic-androgenic steroid users: a descriptive metasynthesis

TL;DR: The findings corroborate previous suggestions of associations between AAS use and the use of other licit and illicit substances and suggest efforts must be intensified to combat the debilitating effects of AAS-associated polypharmacy.
Abstract: As far as we are aware, no previous systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative/descriptive literature on polypharmacy in anabolic-androgenic steroid(s) (AAS) users has been published. We systematically reviewed and synthesized qualitative/descriptive literature gathered from searches in electronic databases and by inspecting reference lists of relevant literature to investigate AAS users’ polypharmacy. We adhered to the recommendations of the UK Economic and Social Research Council’s qualitative research synthesis manual and the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 50 studies published between 1985 and 2014 were included in the analysis. Studies originated from 10 countries although most originated from United States (n = 22), followed by Sweden (n = 7), England only (n = 5), and the United Kingdom (n = 4). It was evident that prior to their debut, AAS users often used other licit and illicit substances. The main ancillary/supplementary substances used were alcohol, and cannabis/cannabinoids followed by cocaine, growth hormone, and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), amphetamine/meth, clenbuterol, ephedra/ephedrine, insulin, and thyroxine. Other popular substance classes were analgesics/opioids, dietary/nutritional supplements, and diuretics. Our classification of the various substances used by AAS users resulted in 13 main groups. These non-AAS substances were used mainly to enhance the effects of AAS, combat the side effects of AAS, and for recreational or relaxation purposes, as well as sexual enhancement. Our findings corroborate previous suggestions of associations between AAS use and the use of other licit and illicit substances. Efforts must be intensified to combat the debilitating effects of AAS-associated polypharmacy.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: AAS abuse has now become particularly prevalent in regions such as Scandinavia, the United States, Brazil, and British Commonwealth countries, but remains rare in countries such as China, Korea, and Japan - a pattern that reflects cultural differences in attitudes towards male muscularity.

119 citations


Cites background from "Polypharmacy among anabolic-androge..."

  • ...These hormones were formerly very expensive, but are now cheaply available via the Internet from overseas manufacturers (Brennan, Kanayama, Hudson, & Pope, 2011; Gibney, Healy, & Sonksen, 2007; Holt & M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED Sonksen, 2008; Sagoe et al., 2015)....

    [...]

  • ...Several recent papers have addressed this phenomenon of polypharmacy in greater detail (Dodge & Hoagland, 2011; Hildebrandt, Lai et al., 2011; Ip et al., 2011; Sagoe et al., 2015)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) in fitness and strength training environments have revealed great variance in users' approach to AAS use and more specifically the...
Abstract: Recent research into the use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) in fitness and strength training environments have revealed great variance in users’ approach to AAS use and more specifically the...

82 citations


Cites background from "Polypharmacy among anabolic-androge..."

  • ...…and qualitative research into the various subcultures where AAS are being used have revealed a much more nuanced picture (e.g. Christiansen & Bojsen-Møller, 2012; Cohen, Collins, Darkes, & Gwartney, 2007; Liokaftos, Forthcoming; Monaghan, 2001; Parkinson & Evans, 2006; Sagoe et al., 2015)....

    [...]

  • ...However, both quantitative and qualitative research into the various subcultures where AAS are being used have revealed a much more nuanced picture (e.g. Christiansen & Bojsen-Møller, 2012; Cohen, Collins, Darkes, & Gwartney, 2007; Liokaftos, Forthcoming; Monaghan, 2001; Parkinson & Evans, 2006; Sagoe et al., 2015)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of this study demonstrate the need to make information about AAS accessible to the general population and to inform health service providers about variations in motivations and associated risk behaviours.

76 citations


Cites background from "Polypharmacy among anabolic-androge..."

  • ...…properties of these substances or related to IPED use, as some psychoactive drug use can be related to performance enhancement, including the use of: stimulants, anti-depressants and tranquilisers to aid sleep and recovery and opioids for pain management (Miller et al., 2002; Sagoe et al., 2015)....

    [...]

  • ...Use of psychoactive substances for performance related purposes has been noted those bodybuilding and may be occurring among this group (Sagoe et al., 2015)....

    [...]

  • ...For example, stimulants such as amphetamine may be used to facilitate training, enhance fat loss and suppress appetite (Sagoe et al., 2015)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This large-scale systematic investigation of Aas use on brain structure shows negative correlations between AAS use and brain volume and cortical thickness, which may serve to raise concern about the long-term consequences of AAS Use on structural features of the brain.

71 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Key changes in the authors' knowledge during the 20 years, in particular, in relation to HIV prevalence, changes in the market and patterns of use make anabolic steroid use a public health concern.
Abstract: Aims: The aim of the paper was to identify changes in the extent and patterns of anabolic steroid use in the United Kingdom to better understand the public health implications within the context of the current health-related evidence base. Methods: Using the two time points of 1995 (prior to legislation changes in the United Kingdom) and 2015, a review of the evidence related to health harms was conducted, in conjunction with needle and syringe programme (NSP) data in Cheshire & Merseyside (UK) relating to anabolic steroid users. Findings: Dramatic increases in the numbers of anabolic steroid users accessing NSPs, 553 in 1995 to 2446 in 2015, now accounting for 54.9% of clients. With the inclusion of pharmacy NSPs, this rose to 5336 individual anabolic steroid users. Conclusions: Key changes in our knowledge during the 20 years, in particular in relation to HIV prevalence, changes in the market and patterns of use make anabolic steroid use a public health concern. In the context of increasing numbers of injectors, there is a need for comprehensive interventions.

68 citations


Cites background from "Polypharmacy among anabolic-androge..."

  • ...Nowhere is this more pronounced than in the use of anabolic steroids and associated drugs, the number and diversity of drugs being used (Sagoe et al., 2015), the accompanying psychoactive drug use (Hope et al., 2013) and the massive dosages being used by even the most novice of users (Chandler &…...

    [...]

  • ...This is not unique to the United Kingdom but a global issue (Larance, Degenhardt, Copeland, & Dillon, 2008; Parkinson & Evans, 2006; Sagoe et al., 2015; Skarberg, Nyberg, & Engstrom, 2009)....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Abstract: David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses

62,157 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Abstract: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in health care. Clinicians read them to keep up to date with their field,1,2 and they are often used as a starting point for developing clinical practice guidelines. Granting agencies may require a systematic review to ensure there is justification for further research,3 and some health care journals are moving in this direction.4 As with all research, the value of a systematic review depends on what was done, what was found, and the clarity of reporting. As with other publications, the reporting quality of systematic reviews varies, limiting readers' ability to assess the strengths and weaknesses of those reviews. Several early studies evaluated the quality of review reports. In 1987, Mulrow examined 50 review articles published in 4 leading medical journals in 1985 and 1986 and found that none met all 8 explicit scientific criteria, such as a quality assessment of included studies.5 In 1987, Sacks and colleagues6 evaluated the adequacy of reporting of 83 meta-analyses on 23 characteristics in 6 domains. Reporting was generally poor; between 1 and 14 characteristics were adequately reported (mean = 7.7; standard deviation = 2.7). A 1996 update of this study found little improvement.7 In 1996, to address the suboptimal reporting of meta-analyses, an international group developed a guidance called the QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses), which focused on the reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.8 In this article, we summarize a revision of these guidelines, renamed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), which have been updated to address several conceptual and practical advances in the science of systematic reviews (Box 1). Box 1 Conceptual issues in the evolution from QUOROM to PRISMA

46,935 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.

31,379 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Items such as physical exam findings, radiographic interpretations, or other diagnostic tests often rely on some degree of subjective interpretation by observers and studies that measure the agreement between two or more observers should include a statistic that takes into account the fact that observers will sometimes agree or disagree simply by chance.
Abstract: Items such as physical exam findings, radiographic interpretations, or other diagnostic tests often rely on some degree of subjective interpretation by observers. Studies that measure the agreement between two or more observers should include a statistic that takes into account the fact that observers will sometimes agree or disagree simply by chance. The kappa statistic (or kappa coefficient) is the most commonly used statistic for this purpose. A kappa of 1 indicates perfect agreement, whereas a kappa of 0 indicates agreement equivalent to chance. A limitation of kappa is that it is affected by the prevalence of the finding under observation. Methods to overcome this limitation have been described.

6,539 citations


Additional excerpts

  • ...001) between the two reviewers [61]....

    [...]