Position paper: digital engineering and building information modelling in Australia
Summary (2 min read)
Information Modelling in Australia
- “First, have a definite, clear practical ideal; a goal, an objective.
- Though many see the core elements of these two concepts as addressing distinct fundamental issues, some define them as similar [12 ,13].
- This paper aims at providing clear definitions of DE and BIM, their domains, how and why these two are linked, and how they relate to the broader and emerging concepts surrounding them.
Foundations of BIM
- BIM is an object-oriented approach to creating, managing and using various geometric – such as dimensions and weight – and non-geometric – such as material and cost data.
- BIM supports data visualisation; information management and documentation; inbuilt intelligence, analysis and simulation; and workflow management [39].
- Conceptually BIM can be used across all the phases of an asset lifecycle; however, in practice its usage beyond the design and construction phases is low [4 ,46].
- In fact, BIM has evolved as a set of processes and tools, not a management method [20].
- As a workable solution, various complementary digital technologies must be leveraged alongside BIM [52 ,53].
Foundations of digital engineering (DE)
- One of the first uses of the term DE goes back to 1975, where DE was discussed in the context of electronic and logic circuit design.
- Digital engineering (DE) is also closely associated with the term engineering.
- There must be a formalised DC creation strategy in place, for governing the curation, sharing, integration, and use of DC across the boundaries of disciplinary teams, organisations, and the lifecycle phases, with support of an authoritative source of truth (AST).
- Currently, state governments in Australia, as well as the private sector, have recognised the great potential provided by DE for improving various facets of delivering and managing buildings and infrastructure assets and networks [36 ,63].
The confusion
- According to the seminal work by Alvesson and Sandberg [68], confusion over defining concepts must be addressed where discrepancies are observed among individuals in providing definitions or when available definitions offer contradictory or competing explanations.
- Several examples of this confusion are briefly described below.
- As a common approach, typically employed by industry practitioners, is to use the terms BIM and DE interchangeably – to recognise no distinction between DE and BIM (see Northwood [12], Hardcastle and Hubert [69], Hampson and Shemery [36] and TfNSW [70]).
- Definitions in this category offer competing lists of technologies to be integrated with BIM in creating DE.
- Besides, the points of distinction, undermine the fundamental drivers for adopting BIM: interoperability and collaborative working; emphasise on the exchange of structured data; extension to the entire supply chain; and integration with other technologies.
Sources of confusion
- The confusion exists, as discussed above, and two major reasons compound it.
- First, academic references to the concept of DE, particularly within the construction context, are rare.
- Second, government publications and guidelines are not consistent.
- So too, this view contrasts other government documents; it does not align with the definition provided in VDAS [11], in which DE is “a convergence of emerging technologies such as BIM, GIS and other related systems for deriving better businesses, projects and asset management outcomes.”.
- The definition provided for BIM in Queensland takes a different approach, emphasising the role of BIM throughout the life cycle of assets.
Settling the confusion
- As illustrated in Figure 2, despite some fundamental similarities, major differentiators between BIM and DE on fundamental aspects should be recognised.
- DE relies on a versatile set of methodologies to inform strategic decision-making, not only in projects – that BIM does – but also across program and portfolio levels .
- Digital twin represents the ideal application of BIM in a project, where DE implementation in ultimate levels should result in the implementation of Industry 4.0 [61], where cyber-physical systems integrate into a new production system and economy.
- There is a broad literature about technologies that form Industry 4.0.
- Figure 3 provides a reference for the technologies proposed in this paper as a contextualised version for construction settings.
Concluding remarks
- This position paper has sought out to settle the confusion between the concepts of BIM and DE.
- As discussed, the sources of this confusion are found in the academic discourse, as well as, in professional and government documents.
- By reviewing the origins and foundations of BIM and DE, this paper contributes to increasing the collective understanding across industry and academia of how these concepts came into being and what are their implications for practice.
- This positions paper focused primarily in Australia, there exist similar patterns to other national systems.
- At the same time, DE is an industry agnostic term that can help initiate discussions and facilitate knowledge transfer to construction from other industries, such as manufacturing and computer science, where digital technologies have been highly developed, tested and diffused across these sectors.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
56 citations
14 citations
13 citations
6 citations
5 citations
References
1,499 citations
729 citations
569 citations
342 citations
267 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. What is the ideal application of BIM in a project?
Digital twin represents the ideal application of BIM in a project, where DE implementation in ultimate levels should result in the implementation of Industry 4.0 [61], where cyber-physical systems integrate into a new production system and economy.
Q3. What is the significance of the construction industry in Australia?
The construction industry generates over $350 billion in revenue, producing around 8.1% of Australia’s GDP, with a projected annual growth rate of 2.5% between 2019 to 2024 [20].
Q4. What are the key visions for the construction industry in Australia?
Of the nine key visions emerging from Construction 2020, “Information and communication technologies for construction” and “virtual prototyping for design, manufacture and operation” were mentioned as the industry strategic visions for the development of the digital built environment in Australia [25].
Q5. What are the main challenges of the Australian construction industry?
Despite its significance, the Australian construction industry has major challenges – high construction costs, unsatisfactory project performance, poor safety, and low construction productivity [21 ,22].
Q6. What is the role of Transport for NSW in the development of DE in Australia?
Transport for NSW (TfNSW) has acted as the driving force behindpromoting the adoption of DE in Australia, to maximise quality and efficiency in delivering transport projects [65].
Q7. What is the ideal use of BIM across all phases of asset lifecycle?
The ideal use of BIM across all phases of asset lifecycle is only partially realised (see Edirisinghe [47],PishdadBozorgi et al. [48],Gao and Pishdad-Bozorgi [49]); BIM is currently used only on project delivery phase to fulfil bespoke project level objectives [6 ,50].
Q8. What is the role of the TfNSW in promoting DE in Australia?
state governments in Australia, as well as the private sector, have recognised the great potential provided by DE for improving various facets of delivering and managing buildings and infrastructure assets and networks [36 ,63].
Q9. What is the definition of the term BIM?
The widespread acceptance of BIM and recognising it as the vision for the future of the Australian construction industry come from both the building industry [1 ,32 ,35], as well as the infrastructure sector [37 ,38].
Q10. What are the main organisations that have promoted the concept of BIM in Australia?
Professional organisation in the Australian construction industry have promoted the concept of BIM, as their primary target: NATSPEC [29], buildingSMART Australasia [30]; Australian Institute of Architects and Consult Australia [31]; Australian Institute of Building [32]; Australian Construction Industry Forum and Australasian Procurement and Construction Council [33]; AMCA [34] and recently ABAB [35] (see Hampson and Shemery [36] for details).
Q11. What are the main points of distinction between DE and BIM?
Though considered as a selling point for DE, collaboration and smooth exchange of data across a network of various data sources and interoperable systems are central elements of BIM [10].
Q12. What is the economic impact of the construction industry?
The construction industry hasalso one of the greatest economic spill over effects, namely, it represents an additional economic benefit of $2.86 for every $1 of construction Gross Domestic Product (GDP) [3]