Post-COVID‑19-Arthritis. Manifestation unter dem klinischen Bild einer reaktiven Arthritis
TL;DR: In this paper, 13 fallberichte einer reaktiven Arthritis im Zusammenhang with einer Coronavirus-Krankheit-2019 (COVID‑19) referiert.
Abstract: Es werden 13 Fallberichte einer reaktiven Arthritis im Zusammenhang mit einer Coronavirus-Krankheit-2019 (COVID‑19) referiert. Manner sind haufiger betroffen als Frauen. Die Arthritis manifestiert sich 4 bis 44 Tage nach der Infektion bzw. dem Auftreten der COVID‑19-Symptome. Die akute Arthritis ist monoartikular oder oligoartikular. Nur einer von 7 untersuchten Patienten war Humanes-Leukozyten-Antigen(HLA)-B27-positiv. Eine direkte virale Infektion des Gelenkes mit „severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2“ (SARS-CoV‑2) wurde in der Synovialflussigkeit nicht nachgewiesen und in der Synovialis nicht untersucht. Die Arthritis wurde mit nichtsteroidalen Antirheumatika und/oder intraartikularen oder systemischen Kortikosteroiden erfolgreich behandelt. Die Pathogenese der post-COVID‑19-reaktiven Arthritis ist ungeklart.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: In this article , the authors investigated the dangerous interplay between the immune response against infectious agents and autoimmunity, and to better understand the triggering role of infection as a risk factor in autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disease development.
Abstract: The clinical and immunological spectrum of acute and post-active COVID-19 syndrome overlaps with criteria used to characterize autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Indeed, following SARS-Cov2 infection, the innate immune response is altered with an initial delayed production of interferon type I (IFN-I), while the NF-kappa B and inflammasome pathways are activated. In lung and digestive tissues, an alternative and extrafollicular immune response against SARS-Cov2 takes place with, consequently, an altered humoral and memory T cell response leading to breakdown of tolerance with the emergence of autoantibodies. However, the risk of developing severe COVID-19 among SLE and RA patients did not exceed the general population except in those having pre-existing neutralizing autoantibodies against IFN-I. Treatment discontinuation rather than COVID-19 infection or vaccination increases the risk of developing flares. Last but not least, a limited number of case reports of individuals having developed SLE or RA following COVID-19 infection/vaccination have been reported. Altogether, the SARS-Cov2 pandemic represents an unique opportunity to investigate the dangerous interplay between the immune response against infectious agents and autoimmunity, and to better understand the triggering role of infection as a risk factor in autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disease development.
10 citations
TL;DR: In this article , a literature search has been performed from December 2019 to December 2021, which included case reports of reactive arthritis occurring after COVID-19 infection, which may occur after a distant infection in a genetically predisposed individual.
Abstract: Reactive arthritis is acute aseptic arthritis occurring 1 to 4 weeks after a distant infection in a genetically predisposed individual. It may occur after COVID-19 infection. We summarize, in this article, the current findings of reactive arthritis following COVID-19 infection.A literature search has been performed from December 2019 to December 2021. We included case reports of reactive arthritis occurring after COVID-19 infection. We collected demographic, clinical, and paraclinical data.A total of 22 articles were reviewed. There were 14 men and 11 women with a mean age of 44.96 + 17.47 years. Oligoarticular involvement of the lower limbs was the most frequent clinical presentation. The time between arthritis and COVID infection ranged from 6 to 48 days. The diagnosis was based on clinical and laboratory findings. The pharmacological management was based on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 20 cases. Systemic or local steroid therapy was indicated in 13 patients. Sulfasalazine was indicated in two cases. Alleviation of symptoms and recovery were noted in 22 cases. The mean duration of the clinical resolution was 16 + 57 days.The diagnosis of reactive arthritis should be considered in patients with a new onset of arthritis following COVID-19 infection. Its mechanism is still unclear.
9 citations
TL;DR: In this article , the authors provide an overview of recent articles which describe new thinking regarding HLA-B27-associated reactive arthritis (ReA), including those additional infection-related arthritides triggered by microbes that often are grouped under the term ReA.
Abstract: Purpose of review We provide an overview of recent articles which describe new thinking regarding HLA-B27-associated reactive arthritis (ReA), including those additional infection-related arthritides triggered by microbes that often are grouped under the term ReA. Recent findings With the advent and continuation of the pandemic, an increasing number of cases and case series of post-COVID-19 arthritis have been reported and classified as ReA. Further, arthritis after COVID-19 vaccination is a new entity included within the spectrum of ReA. New causative microorganisms identified in case reports include Clostridium difficile, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Giardia lamblia, Leptospira, and babesiosis. SARS-CoV-2 is emerging as a significant etiologic agent for apparent ReA. Summary It is now clear that comprehensive clinical and laboratory investigations, synovial fluid analyses, and close follow-up of patients all are essential to differentiate ReA from diseases that may present with similar clinical attributes. Further, and importantly, additional research is required to define the wide diversity in causative agents, epidemiology, and rare case presentations of these arthritides. Finally, new classification and diagnostic criteria, and updated treatment recommendations, are essential to the advancement of our understanding of ReA.
2 citations
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors proposed to abandon the distinction between the two groups of diseases and to prefer the term ReA for both, which created a terminological and nosological issue.
Abstract: The introduction of the term reactive arthritis (ReA) for the joint inflammation observed after infection with Yersinia enterocolitica, in which "a causative pathogen cannot be isolated from the synovial fluid", and the association with the HLA-B27 were the historical milestones for a new classification and assignment to the spondylarthritides (SpA). The division into postinfectious and reactive arthritis proposed in 1976 was put into perspective in the 1990s because of investigations with the newly available molecular biological method of the polymerase chain reaction. Microbial products could be identified from joint samples of patients with ReA. Therefore, it was proposed to abandon the distinction between the two groups of diseases and to prefer the term ReA for both. This created a terminological and nosological issue. On the one hand, there are generally accepted classification and diagnostic criteria for the classical HLA-B27-associated ReA that are assigned to SpA. On the other hand, an increasing number of bacterial pathogens, viruses, amoebas, helminths as well as antiviral and antibacterial vaccinations are described as triggers of arthritis, which have been published under the term ReA. Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic, cases of acute post-COVID-19 arthritis have been described, which were also classified as ReA because of comparable clinical features.Die Einführung der Bezeichnung reaktive Arthritis (ReA) für die nach Infektion mit Yersinia enterocolitica beobachtete Gelenkentzündung, bei der „ein ursächlicher Erreger nicht aus der Gelenkflüssigkeit isoliert werden kann“, und die Assoziation mit dem HLA-B27 waren die historischen Wegmarken für eine neue Klassifikation und Zuordnung zu den Spondyloarthritiden (SpA). Die 1976 vorgeschlagene Unterteilung in postinfektiöse und reaktive Arthritiden erfuhr in den 1990er-Jahren durch Untersuchungen mit der neu verfügbaren molekularbiologischen Methode der Polymerasekettenreaktion eine Relativierung. Aus Gelenkproben von Patienten mit ReA konnten mikrobielle Produkte identifiziert werden. Deshalb wurde vorgeschlagen, die Unterscheidung zwischen den beiden Erkrankungsgruppen aufzugeben und für beide den Begriff „ReA“ vorzuziehen. Daraus ist eine terminologische und nosologische Problematik entstanden. Einerseits existieren Klassifikations- und Diagnosekriterien für die klassische HLA-B27-assoziierte ReA, die der SpA zugeordnet und allgemein akzeptiert sind. Andererseits sind eine zunehmende Zahl von bakteriellen Erregern, Viren, Amöben, Helminthen, aber auch antivirale und antibakterielle Impfungen als Auslöser einer Arthritis beschrieben, die unter der Bezeichnung ReA publiziert wurden. Seit dem Beginn der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie werden Fälle einer akuten Post-COVID-19-Arthritis beschrieben, die wegen der vergleichbaren klinischen Merkmale ebenfalls als ReA klassifiziert wurden.
1 citations
TL;DR: In this article , the authors proposed to abandon the distinction between the two groups of diseases and to prefer the term ReA for both, which created a terminological and nosological issue.
Abstract: The introduction of the term reactive arthritis (ReA) for the joint inflammation observed after infection with Yersinia enterocolitica, in which "a causative pathogen cannot be isolated from the synovial fluid", and the association with the HLA-B27 were the historical milestones for a new classification and assignment to the spondylarthritides (SpA). The division into postinfectious and reactive arthritis proposed in 1976 was put into perspective in the 1990s because of investigations with the newly available molecular biological method of the polymerase chain reaction. Microbial products could be identified from joint samples of patients with ReA. Therefore, it was proposed to abandon the distinction between the two groups of diseases and to prefer the term ReA for both. This created a terminological and nosological issue. On the one hand, there are generally accepted classification and diagnostic criteria for the classical HLA-B27-associated ReA that are assigned to SpA. On the other hand, an increasing number of bacterial pathogens, viruses, amoebas, helminths as well as antiviral and antibacterial vaccinations are described as triggers of arthritis, which have been published under the term ReA. Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic, cases of acute post-COVID-19 arthritis have been described, which were also classified as ReA because of comparable clinical features.Die Einführung der Bezeichnung reaktive Arthritis (ReA) für die nach Infektion mit Yersinia enterocolitica beobachtete Gelenkentzündung, bei der „ein ursächlicher Erreger nicht aus der Gelenkflüssigkeit isoliert werden kann“, und die Assoziation mit dem HLA-B27 waren die historischen Wegmarken für eine neue Klassifikation und Zuordnung zu den Spondyloarthritiden (SpA). Die 1976 vorgeschlagene Unterteilung in postinfektiöse und reaktive Arthritiden erfuhr in den 1990er-Jahren durch Untersuchungen mit der neu verfügbaren molekularbiologischen Methode der Polymerasekettenreaktion eine Relativierung. Aus Gelenkproben von Patienten mit ReA konnten mikrobielle Produkte identifiziert werden. Deshalb wurde vorgeschlagen, die Unterscheidung zwischen den beiden Erkrankungsgruppen aufzugeben und für beide den Begriff „ReA“ vorzuziehen. Daraus ist eine terminologische und nosologische Problematik entstanden. Einerseits existieren Klassifikations- und Diagnosekriterien für die klassische HLA-B27-assoziierte ReA, die der SpA zugeordnet und allgemein akzeptiert sind. Andererseits sind eine zunehmende Zahl von bakteriellen Erregern, Viren, Amöben, Helminthen, aber auch antivirale und antibakterielle Impfungen als Auslöser einer Arthritis beschrieben, die unter der Bezeichnung ReA publiziert wurden. Seit dem Beginn der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie werden Fälle einer akuten Post-COVID-19-Arthritis beschrieben, die wegen der vergleichbaren klinischen Merkmale ebenfalls als ReA klassifiziert wurden.
1 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: The first case of ReA after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is reported, in a male patient who was admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and subsequently completing a 14-day course of favipiravir.
Abstract: Reactive arthritis (ReA) is typically preceded by sexually transmitted disease or gastrointestinal infection. An association has also been reported with bacterial and viral respiratory infections. Herein, we report the first case of ReA after the he severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This male patient is in his 50s who was admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia. On the second day of admission, SARS-CoV-2 PCR was positive from nasopharyngeal swab specimen. Despite starting standard dose of favipiravir, his respiratory condition deteriorated during hospitalisation. On the fourth hospital day, he developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and was intubated. On day 11, he was successfully extubated, subsequently completing a 14-day course of favipiravir. On day 21, 1 day after starting physical therapy, he developed acute bilateral arthritis in his ankles, with mild enthesitis in his right Achilles tendon, without rash, conjunctivitis, or preceding diarrhoea or urethritis. Arthrocentesis of his left ankle revealed mild inflammatory fluid without monosodium urate or calcium pyrophosphate crystals. Culture of synovial fluid was negative. Plain X-rays of his ankles and feet showed no erosive changes or enthesophytes. Tests for syphilis, HIV, anti-streptolysin O (ASO), Mycoplasma, Chlamydia pneumoniae, antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and Human Leukocyte Antigen-B27 (HLA-B27) were negative. Gonococcal and Chlamydia trachomatis urine PCR were also negative. He was diagnosed with ReA. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID)s and intra-articular corticosteroid injection resulted in moderate improvement.
112 citations
TL;DR: The diagnosis of reactive arthritis is mainly clinical based on acute oligoarticular arthritis of larger joints that develops within 2-4 weeks of the preceding infection, and treatment with antibiotics to cure Chlamydia infection is important.
Abstract: The term 'reactive arthritis' was first used in 1969 to describe the development of sterile inflammatory arthritis as a sequel to remote infection, often in the gastrointestinal or urogenital tract. The demonstration of antigenic material (e.g. Salmonella and Yersinia lipopolysaccharide), DNA and RNA, and, in occasional cases, evidence of metabolically active Chlamydia spp. in the joints has blurred the boundary between reactive and post-infectious forms of arthritis. No validated and generally agreed diagnostic criteria exist, but the diagnosis of reactive arthritis is mainly clinical based on acute oligoarticular arthritis of larger joints that develops within 2-4 weeks of the preceding infection. In about 25% of patients, the infection can be asymptomatic. Diagnosis of the triggering infection is very helpful for the diagnosis of reactive arthritis. This is mainly achieved by isolating the triggering infection (stools, urogenital tract) by cultures (stool cultures for enteric microbes) or ligase reaction (Chlamydia trachomatis). However, after the onset of arthritis, this is less likely to be possible. Therefore, the diagnosis must rely on various serological tests to demonstrate evidence of previous infection, but, these serological tests are unfortunately not standardized. Treatment with antibiotics to cure Chlamydia infection is important, but the use of either short or prolonged courses of antibiotics in established arthritis has not been found to be effective for the cure of arthritis. The long-term outcome of reactive arthritis is usually good; however, about 25-50% of patients, depending on the triggering infections and possible new infections, subsequently develop acute arthritis. About 25% of patients proceed to chronic spondyloarthritis of varying activity.
106 citations
TL;DR: A careful consideration of epidemiological, clinical and serological features is required to guide clinicians in making diagnostic and treatment decisions, as most virally mediated arthritides are self-limiting some warrant the initiation of specific antiviral therapy.
Abstract: Acute-onset arthritis is a common clinical problem facing both the general clinician and the rheumatologist. A viral aetiology is though to be responsible for approximately 1% of all cases of acute arthritis with a wide range of causal agents recognised. The epidemiology of acute viral arthritis continues to evolve, with some aetiologies, such as rubella, becoming less common due to vaccination, while some vector-borne viruses have become more widespread. A travel history therefore forms an important part of the assessment of patients presenting with an acute arthritis. Worldwide, parvovirus B19, hepatitis B and C, HIV and the alphaviruses are among the most important causes of virally mediated arthritis. Targeted serological testing may be of value in establishing a diagnosis, and clinicians must also be aware that low-titre autoantibodies, such as rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody, can occur in the context of acute viral arthritis. A careful consideration of epidemiological, clinical and serological features is therefore required to guide clinicians in making diagnostic and treatment decisions. While most virally mediated arthritides are self-limiting some warrant the initiation of specific antiviral therapy.
97 citations
TL;DR: The first reactive artrhritis associated with COVID-19 infection is reported, a 73-year-old man with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and coronary heart disease, who presented to emergency department with a history of fever, weakness, and dry cough for one week.
Abstract: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) arised from Wuhan Province in China in December 2019, has quickly become a global public health emergency. The first confirmed COVID-19 patient in Turkey was reported on 11th March 2020. A 73-year-old man with diabetes mellitus, hypertension and coronary heart disease presented to emergency department with a history of fever, weakness, and dry cough for one week. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were positive for COVID-19. He was treated with ceftriaxone, hidroxychloroquine and azitromycin Severeal days after completion of COVID-19 treatment, asymetric oligoarticular arthritis in his lower extremities were developed. In the course of time, clinicians all over the world experienced several different forms of COVID-19. In this case, we report the first reactive artrhritis associated with COVID-19 infection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
87 citations
28 Oct 2020
TL;DR: CO VID-19 is a new differential diagnosis to bear in mind when evaluating patients with musculoskeletal symptoms and rheumatologists might play a crucial role in identifying COVID-19 cases in early phases of the illness.
Abstract: Different proportions of musculoskeletal or autoimmune manifestations associated with COVID-19 have been reported in literature. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of assessing the prevalence of rheumatic manifestations in patients affected by COVID-19, as initial symptom or during disease course. A database search was run on May 18th, 2020, using two distinct strategies. We were interested in the percentage of symptoms of potential rheumatologic interest observed in large population studies of COVID-19 cases, and in identifying uncommon autoimmune disorders described in patients with COVID-19. For manifestations individually reported, a meta-analysis was performed taking into consideration the proportion of COVID-19 patients presenting the symptom. Eighty eight original articles were included in the systematic review and 51 in the meta-analysis. We found pooled estimates of 19% for muscle pain and 32% for fatigue as initial symptom of COVID-19 presentation and, respectively, of 16 and 36% during the disease course. Only one article discussed arthralgia as unique symptom. Additionally, we found that vasculitis, chilblains, presence of autoantibodies commonly found in patients with rheumatic diseases, or autoimmune haematological and neurological disorders have all been reported in patients with COVID-19. In conclusion, our review and meta-analysis emphasises that symptoms potentially leading to rheumatologic referral are common in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, COVID-19 is a new differential diagnosis to bear in mind when evaluating patients with musculoskeletal symptoms and rheumatologists might play a crucial role in identifying COVID-19 cases in early phases of the illness.
80 citations