scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Report•DOI•

Potential hydrologic characterization wells in Amargosa Valley

TL;DR: More than 500 domestic, agricultural, and monitoring wells were identified in the Amargosa Valley as discussed by the authors, and 80 of them were identified as potential hydrologic characterization wells, in support of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Underground Test Area/Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (UGTA/RIFS).
Abstract: More than 500 domestic, agricultural, and monitoring wells were identified in the Amargosa Valley. From this list, 80 wells were identified as potential hydrologic characterization wells, in support of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Underground Test Area/Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (UGTA/RIFS). Previous hydrogeologic studies have shown that groundwater flow in the basin is complex and that aquifers may have little lateral continuity. Wells located more than 10 km or so from the Nevada Test Site (NTS) boundary may yield data that are difficult to correlate to sources from the NTS. Also, monitoring well locations should be chosen within the guidelines of a hydrologic conceptual model and monitoring plan. Since these do not exist at this time, recompletion recommendations will be restricted to wells relatively close (approximately 20 km) to the NTS boundary. Recompletion recommendations were made for two abandoned agricultural irrigation wells near the town of Amargosa Valley (previously Lathrop Wells), for two abandoned wildcat oil wells about 10 km southwest of Amargosa Valley, and for Test Well 5 (TW-5), about 10 km east of Amargosa Valley.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

M)E/Nv/10845-50
UC-703
POTENTIAL HYDROLOGIC
CHARACTERIZATION WELLS
IN AMARGOSA VALLEY
bY
Brad
Lyles
and Todd
Mihevc
SEPTEMBER
1994

This
report was prepared
as
an
accoullt of work sponsored by the
United
States Government. Neither the
United
States
nor
the
United
States Department of Energy, nor any of
their
employees,
makes
any warranty, express or implied,
or
assumes
any legal
liability
or
responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or
usefulness
of
any information,
apparatus, product
or
process
disclosed, or
represents
that
its
use
would not infringe privately
owned
rights.
Reference
herein
to
any
specific
commercial
product, process,
or
service
by
trade
name,
mark,
manufacturer,
or
otherwise,
does
not
necessarily constitute or imply
its
endorsement., recommendation, or favoring by the
United
States
Government
or
any
agency themf. The
views
and
opinions of authors expressed herein
do
not necessarily
state
or
reflect those of the
United
States
Government or any agency thereof.
This
report
has
been
reproduced directly
from
the best available copy.
Available
to
DOE
and
DOE
contractors
from
the
oftice
of Scientific and
Technical
Information,
P.O.
Box
62,
Oak
Ridge,
TN
37831;
prices available
from
(615) 576-8401.
Available
to
the
public
from
the National
Technical
Information
Service,
US.
Department of Commerce, 5285
Port
Royal
Rd.,
Springfield,
VA
22161.

DISCLAIMER
Portions of this document may be illegible
in
electronic image products. Images are
produced from the best available original
document.

DOE/NV/
1
0845-50
UC-703
POTENTIAL HYDROLOGIC
CHARACTERIZATION WELLS
IN
AMARGOSA VALLEY
bY
Brad Lyles and Todd Mihevc
Water Resources Center
Desert Research Institute
University and Community College System
of
Nevada
Publication
No.
45
129
prepared
for
Nevada Operations Office
U.S.
Department
of
Energy
Las
Vegas, Nevada
September 1994
The work
upon
which
this report
is
based
was
supported by
the
U.S.
Department
of
Energy

ABSTRACT
More
than
500
domestic, agricultural, and monitoring wells were identified
in
the
Amargosa Valley. From
this
list,
80
wells were identified
as
potential hydrologic
characterization wells,
in
support of the
U.S.
Department
of
Energy
(DOE)
Underground Test
Area/Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (UGTA/RIFS). Previous hydrogeologic
studies have shown that groundwater
flow
in
the basin
is
complex
and
that aquifers may have
little lateral continuity. Wells located more than
10
km
or
so
from the Nevada Test Site
(NTS)
boundary
may yield data that
are
difficult to correlate to
sources
from the
NTS.
Also,
monitoring
well locations should
be
chosen within the guidelines
of
a hydrologic conceptual model and
monitoring plan. Since these do not exist
at
this
time, recompletion recommendations will
be
restricted
to
wells relatively close (approximately
20
km)
to
the
NTS
boundary.
Recompletion recommendations were made for
two
abandoned agricultural irrigation
wells near the town
of
Amargosa Valley (previously Lathrop Wells), for
two
abandoned wildcat
oil
wells about
10
km
southwest of Amargosa Valley, and for Test Well
5
(TW-5),
about 10
km
east of Amargosa Valley.
i

References
More filters
Report•DOI•
TL;DR: Some 39 major ground-water systems are recognized in the Great Basin region of Nevada, Utah, and adjacent states as discussed by the authors, ranging from local single-basin systems to large regional systems where flow paths may be more than 100 miles long and pass beneath several basins.
Abstract: Some 39 major ground-water systems are recognized in the Great Basin region of Nevada, Utah, and adjacent states. The systems range from local single-basin systems to large regional systems where flow paths may be more than 100 miles long and pass beneath several basins. The larger regional flow systems are within the carbonate-rock province of eastern Nevada and western Utah.

69 citations

Report•DOI•
TL;DR: Yucca Mountain is located within the Alkali Flat-Furnace Creek Ranch groundwater subbasin, which is tributary to the Death Valley ground-water basin this paper.
Abstract: Yucca Mountain is located within the Alkali Flat-Furnace Creek Ranch ground-water subbasin, which is tributary to the Death Valley ground-water basin. Under present climatic conditions, most ground-water recharge occurs at Pahute Mesa, at mountain ranges farther north, and perhaps at Timber Mountain. Smaller amounts of recharge probably occur beneath larger washes, such as Fortymile Canyon-Fortymile Wash. Two major ground-water discharge areas occur within the subbasin: Alkali Flat (Franklin Lake), where discharge occurs almost entirely by evapotranspiration; and Furnace Creek Ranch area in Death Valley, where discharge results from numerous small springs. Beneath Yucca Mountain, depth to ground water ranges from about 460 to about 700 m. Perched water may be present, but the data are equivocal. Few data are available on the occurrence and movement of water in the unsaturated zone. Recharge at Yucca Mountain is probably less than 5 mm/yr, and perhaps much less. Within the saturated zone, water moves generally southeast or south, primarily through fractures. The hydraulic gradient is very low on the eastern (downgradient) side of Yucca Mountain. The gradient increases west and north; the increase in gradient is evidence of an area of low permeability. Data on locations of permeable fractures in drill holes aremore » not sufficient for definition of hydrostratigraphic units. However, observations of fracture frequency, as related to lithology, and data obtained from similar rocks beneath Pahute Mesa support the hypothesis that densely welded tuffs fracture more readily than nonwelded and bedded tuffs do; therefore, these tuffs are likely to be more permeable. Proximity to faults, stress state, and the healing of fractures by mineral deposition affect fracture permeability of a mass of rock and complicate the conceptual model of water movement beneath Yucca Mountain. Data are not sufficient to predict accurately rates of water movement and travel times.« less

64 citations

Other•DOI•
01 Jan 1974
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a method to solve the problem of "uniformity" and "unweighting" in the literature.Page 7.1.1]
Abstract: Page

62 citations