scispace - formally typeset

Practical Application and Discernability of Risky Choice Models

01 Jan 2009-

AboutThe article was published on 2009-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 4 citation(s) till now.

...read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters


Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: The importance of risk preferences in agricultural production has long been identified as an important and preeminent issue of policy relevance. Recent developments in the study of production risk have called into question much of the core of risk production research. This article provides an overview of the prominent literature attempting to quantify the impact of risk preferences on production and a discussion of the recently discovered challenges. These challenges are typified by (a) an inability to discern risk preferences, (b) an inability to discern the factors that relate to risk preferences, (c) evidence that prior estimation has severe problems, and (d) a general failure of current models to address the important policy or behavioral issues. Although some of these challenges may appear at first blush to be insurmountable, we suggest a new agenda for risk research in production that directly addresses each of these issues.

21 citations


Dissertation
09 Sep 2015
Abstract: Cette these analyse les enjeux du developpement economique lies aux dynamiques des cours des matieres premieres en general et ceux du coton en particulier. Traditionnellement, les travaux s’inscrivant dans une optique de long terme questionnent la pertinence des specialisations primaires des PMA. A moyen terme l’interet porte davantage sur l’instabilite dont les consequences sont d’autant plus importantes que la dependance des pays a l’exportation de tels produits est forte. Les enjeux s’articulent alors autour des modalites de regulation des marches, du choix d'outils (publics ou marchands) pour la gestion des incertitudes, le tout dependant de l’apprehension de l’instabilite comme un phenomene endogene ou exogene. Dans un contexte nouveau marque par l’affirmation d’oligopoles de firmes, la segmentation du processus productif mondial, et la financiarisation des marches de matieres premieres, nous proposons un cadre analytique permettant d’aborder differemment ces problematiques. Nos travaux montrent d’abord comment les approches du type chaines globales de valeur peuvent etre mobilisees pour mieux orienter les strategies commerciales / industrielles des PMA. S’appuyant sur la notion de rationalite limitee dans le cadre de modeles de comportements heterogenes, ils prouvent ensuite l’existence d’une forte composante endogene dans l’instabilite et par la meme, l'inefficacite des seuls outils marchands. Au final, pour les pays africains producteurs de coton, il apparait qu’il reste possible de mettre ce produit au service d’une strategie globale de developpement. Cela passe par le recours a des mecanismes hybrides de gestion de l’instabilite, combine au renforcement des dynamiques de cooperation transfrontalieres en vue d’une structuration de chaines regionales de valeur.

11 citations


DOI
27 Nov 2009
Abstract: This thesis aims at measuring the impact of agricultural policy on water use and farms’ incomes in the northeast of the Syrian Arab Republic. The scope of the research is confined to the three governorates of Deir-Ezzour (DEG), Al-Rakka (RAK), and Al-Hassakeh (HAG). The choice of these governorates, that together form the Northeast of Syria, is due to their heavy reliance on policy regulated crops, which makes them relatively more sensitive to any policy reform. Moreover, the negative impact of the current policy on water balance is evident in the Northeast, especially in the area of Al-Khabour basin, located almost entirely in HAG. In the thesis, irrigated agriculture of the Northeast of Syria has been modelled by a set of representative farms, using the General Algebraic Modelling System (GAMS). The representative farms’ programming models are calibrated on data on observed cropping patterns and water use of 2005. Then, the policy reforms that have occurred after 2005 are considered in the models by changing the values of the relevant policy parameters and new baseline results obtained, inclusive of the most recent implemented reforms. The comparison between the baseline results of 2005 and the post-reform baseline results show that the recent reform is expected to have a limited impact on water use and farm income. Predicted changes in water use are less than +5% on average, over the entire region, although they vary across the three governorates of the region, with negative change in Al-Hassakeh, and positive in Al-Rakka and Deir-Ezzour. On the other hand, changes in income levels and stability are more noticeable in the three governorates and are always positive. The changes in average income levels range from +15% in Deir-Ezzour to +3% in Al-Hassakeh. The impact on the stability of income is of the same magnitude in percent terms. It is of interest to note that the impact of the recent policy reforms, due to the stabilization of maize price, is greater on income stability than on average income levels in the three governorates. The next analysis has involved simulation of alternative policy scenarios, including introduction of modern irrigation technology, reform in the farm credit system, and stabilization of alternative crops’ prices. The simulations reveal interesting policy implications. They illustrate that adoption of modern irrigation techniques, even by all farms in the region, would not solve the water scarcity problem in Al-Khabour basin where there will still be a noticeable deficit. This is due to the still low efficiency of modern irrigation schemes in the current condition of the region, but also because our model predicts that water saved thanks to the adoption of modern irrigation schemes will allow expansion of irrigated land. In addition, the results show that decoupling access to official credit from strategic crops would have negligible effects on cropping patterns and, consequently, water use. Similar results come out if the subsidy currently linked to cotton irrigated from private wells would be decoupled. Of the various possible simulated policies, stabilizing cumin price would have the largest positive impact on water consumption, because of expanding cumin cultivation, which is a crop with irrigation requirements, at the expense of wheat and other winter crops. The thesis adds to the evidence that price policy is potentially the instrument that affects farmers’ decision the most. If effective in stabilizing price for water saving crops, this may be an important tool to combine farm welfare improvement with increased sustainability in water use.

2 citations


Cites background from "Practical Application and Discernab..."

  • ...In addition, Just & Just (2009) demonstrate that the EUT hypothesis cannot be rejected because perceptions and preferences, which both affect behaviour under risk, cannot be measured separately....

    [...]


References
More filters

Book ChapterDOI
Abstract: This paper presents a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develops an alternative model, called prospect theory. Choices among risky prospects exhibit several pervasive effects that are inconsistent with the basic tenets of utility theory. In particular, people underweight outcomes that are merely probable in comparison with outcomes that are obtained with certainty. This tendency, called the certainty effect, contributes to risk aversion in choices involving sure gains and to risk seeking in choices involving sure losses. In addition, people generally discard components that are shared by all prospects under consideration. This tendency, called the isolation effect, leads to inconsistent preferences when the same choice is presented in different forms. An alternative theory of choice is developed, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights. The value function is normally concave for gains, commonly convex for losses, and is generally steeper for losses than for gains. Decision weights are generally lower than the corresponding probabilities, except in the range of low prob- abilities. Overweighting of low probabilities may contribute to the attractiveness of both insurance and gambling. EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY has dominated the analysis of decision making under risk. It has been generally accepted as a normative model of rational choice (24), and widely applied as a descriptive model of economic behavior, e.g. (15, 4). Thus, it is assumed that all reasonable people would wish to obey the axioms of the theory (47, 36), and that most people actually do, most of the time. The present paper describes several classes of choice problems in which preferences systematically violate the axioms of expected utility theory. In the light of these observations we argue that utility theory, as it is commonly interpreted and applied, is not an adequate descriptive model and we propose an alternative account of choice under risk. 2. CRITIQUE

34,961 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: We develop a new version of prospect theory that employs cumulative rather than separable decision weights and extends the theory in several respects. This version, called cumulative prospect theory, applies to uncertain as well as to risky prospects with any number of outcomes, and it allows different weighting functions for gains and for losses. Two principles, diminishing sensitivity and loss aversion, are invoked to explain the characteristic curvature of the value function and the weighting functions. A review of the experimental evidence and the results of a new experiment confirm a distinctive fourfold pattern of risk attitudes: risk aversion for gains and risk seeking for losses of high probability; risk seeking for gains and risk aversion for losses of low probability. Expected utility theory reigned for several decades as the dominant normative and descriptive model of decision making under uncertainty, but it has come under serious question in recent years. There is now general agreement that the theory does not provide an adequate description of individual choice: a substantial body of evidence shows that decision makers systematically violate its basic tenets. Many alternative models have been proposed in response to this empirical challenge (for reviews, see Camerer, 1989; Fishburn, 1988; Machina, 1987). Some time ago we presented a model of choice, called prospect theory, which explained the major violations of expected utility theory in choices between risky prospects with a small number of outcomes (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979; Tversky and Kahneman, 1986). The key elements of this theory are 1) a value function that is concave for gains, convex for losses, and steeper for losses than for gains,

12,066 citations


"Practical Application and Discernab..." refers background or methods in this paper

  • ...Alternatively, some have used laboratory choices to estimate the choice function parameters and determine the best performing model (e.g., Hey and Orme 1994; Buschena and Zilberman 2009), or examine the overall fit (e.g., Tversky and Kahneman 1992)....

    [...]

  • ...We assume, as in typical operationalizations of Quiggin’s model, that the possible states, x1,…,xn, and thus their ranking, are fixed (see for example, Tversky and Kahneman 1992)....

    [...]

  • ...For example, the generalized prospect theory of Tversky and Kahneman (1992) suggests ( )0 0 0( ) ( | ) ( ),sign( ) |v F u x x f x x x x dxπ ∞ −∞ = −∫ (5) where x0 is a reference point (usually assumed to be the status quo or current wealth), u is a function that is concave over outcomes that are…...

    [...]

  • ...To consider prospect theory, we use the modifications introduced by Tversky and Kahneman (1992), which are applied in a manner similar to Quiggin’s rank-dependent utility model....

    [...]


Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: Research in experimental psychology suggests that, in violation of Bayes' rule, most people tend to "overreact" to unexpected and dramatic news events. This study of market efficiency investigates whether such behavior affects stock prices. The empirical evidence, based on CRSP monthly return data, is consistent with the overreaction hypothesis. Substantial weak form market inefficiencies are discovered. The results also shed new light on the January returns earned by prior "winners" and "losers." Portfolios of losers experience exceptionally large January returns as late as five years after portfolio formation. As ECONOMISTS INTERESTED IN both market behavior and the psychology of individual decision making, we have been struck by the similarity of two sets of empirical findings. Both classes of behavior can be characterized as displaying overreaction. This study was undertaken to investigate the possibility that these phenomena are related by more than just appearance. We begin by describing briefly the individual and market behavior that piqued our interest. The term overreaction carries with it an implicit comparison to some degree of reaction that is considered to be appropriate. What is an appropriate reaction? One class,,of tasks which have a well-established norm are probability revision problems for which Bayes' rule prescribes the correct reaction to new information. It has now been well-established that Bayes' rule is not an apt characterization of how individuals actually respond to new data (Kahneman et al. [14]). In revising their beliefs, individuals tend to overweight recent information and underweight prior (or base rate) data. People seem to make predictions according to a simple matching rule: "The predicted value is selected so that the standing of the case in the distribution of outcomes matches its standing in the distribution of impressions" (Kahneman and Tversky [14, p. 416]). This rule-of-thumb, an instance of what Kahneman and Tversky call the representativeness heuristic, violates the basic statistical principal that the extremeness of predictions must be moderated by considerations of predictability. Grether [12] has replicated this finding under incentive compatible conditions. There is also considerable evidence that the actual expectations of professional security analysts and economic forecasters display the same overreaction bias (for a review, see De Bondt [7]). One of the earliest observations about overreaction in markets was made by J. M. Keynes:"... day-to-day fluctuations in the profits of existing investments,

6,688 citations


01 Sep 1997

3,616 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: A new theory of cardinal utility, with an associated set of axioms, is presented. It is a generalization of the von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theory, which permits the analysis of phenomena associated with the distortion of subjective probability.

2,770 citations