scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Preclinical Activity of the Type II CD20 Antibody GA101 (Obinutuzumab) Compared with Rituximab and Ofatumumab In Vitro and in Xenograft Models

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The first preclinical in vitro and in vivo comparison of GA101 (obinutuzumab), a novel glycoengineered type II CD20 monoclonal antibody, with rituximab and ofatumumab, the two currently approved type I CD20 antibodies was reported in this article.
Abstract
We report the first preclinical in vitro and in vivo comparison of GA101 (obinutuzumab), a novel glycoengineered type II CD20 monoclonal antibody, with rituximab and ofatumumab, the two currently approved type I CD20 antibodies The three antibodies were compared in assays measuring direct cell death (AnnexinV/PI staining and time-lapse microscopy), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP), and internalization The models used for the comparison of their activity in vivo were SU-DHL4 and RL xenografts GA101 was found to be superior to rituximab and ofatumumab in the induction of direct cell death (independent of mechanical manipulation required for cell aggregate disruption formed by antibody treatment), whereas it was 10 to 1,000 times less potent in mediating CDC GA101 showed superior activity to rituximab and ofatumumab in ADCC and whole-blood B-cell depletion assays, and was comparable with these two in ADCP GA101 also showed slower internalization rate upon binding to CD20 than rituximab and ofatumumab In vivo, GA101 induced a strong antitumor effect, including complete tumor remission in the SU-DHL4 model and overall superior efficacy compared with both rituximab and ofatumumab When rituximab-pretreated animals were used, second-line treatment with GA101 was still able to control tumor progression, whereas tumors escaped rituximab treatment Taken together, the preclinical data show that the glyoengineered type II CD20 antibody GA101 is differentiated from the two approved type I CD20 antibodies rituximab and ofatumumab by its overall preclinical activity, further supporting its clinical investigation

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update

TL;DR: The backbone of therapy remains multi-agent chemotherapy with vincristine, corticosteroids and an anthracycline with allogeneic stem cell transplantation for eligible candidates and Elderly patients are often unable to tolerate such regimens and carry a particularly poor prognosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Harnessing innate immunity in cancer therapy.

TL;DR: The authors review recent developments in understanding of the antitumour effects of the innate immune system and how this system could be harnessed in the clinic and opens up new possibilities for long-lasting, multilayered tumour control.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Unique carbohydrate–carbohydrate interactions are required for high affinity binding between FcγRIII and antibodies lacking core fucose

TL;DR: A detailed, molecular understanding of the regulatory role of Fc-oligosaccharide core fucosylation in improving ADCC is obtained and a unique mechanism by which the immune system can regulate antibody-mediated effector functions is suggested.
Journal ArticleDOI

Characterization of new human CD20 monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin lymphomas

TL;DR: With increasing evidence that mAb therapeutic activity in vivo depends on complement activation, these new CD20 reagents with their slow off-rates and increased potency in CDC hold considerable promise for improved clinical activity.
Related Papers (5)