scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Preventing Enemy Coalitions: How Wedge Strategies Shape Power Politics

Timothy W. Crawford
- 18 Mar 2011 - 
- Vol. 35, Iss: 4, pp 155-189
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The wedge strategies that are likely to have significant effects use selective accommodation (concessions, compensations, and other inducements) to detach and neutralize potential adversaries.
Abstract
States use wedge strategies to prevent hostile alliances from forming or to disperse those that have formed. These strategies can cause power alignments that are otherwise unlikely to occur, and thus have significant consequences for international politics. How do such strategies work and what conditions promote their success? The wedge strategies that are likely to have significant effects use selective accommodation—concessions, compensations, and other inducements—to detach and neutralize potential adversaries. These kinds of strategies play important roles in the statecraft of both defensive and offensive powers. Defenders use selective accommodation to balance against a primary threat by neutralizing lesser ones that might ally with it. Expansionists use selective accommodation to prevent or break up blocking coalitions, which isolates opposing states by inducing potential balancers to buck-pass, bandwagon, or hide. Two cases—Great Britain's defensive attempts to accommodate Italy in the late 1930s a...

read more

Citations
More filters
Book

국제정치이론 = Theory of international politics

TL;DR: The seeker after the truth is not one who studies the writings of the ancients and, following his natural disposition, puts his trust in them, but rather, one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them, the one who submits to argument and demonstration, and not to the sayings of a human being whose nature is fraught with all kinds of imperfection and deformation as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Dynamics of Global Power Politics: A Framework for Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors call for a research program focused on the dynamics of global power politics, rather than linking realpolitik to structural-realist theoretical frameworks or the putatively anarchical character of world politics, they treat power politics as an object of analysis in its own right.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present

TL;DR: The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the present by Christopher Layne as discussed by the authors is a collection of influential articles on the history of the United States' foreign policy.

Protection States Trust?: Major Power Patronage, Nuclear Behavior, and Alliance Dynamics

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose an alliance compensation theory to explain why some states that receive a nuclear security guarantee move towards, and sometimes back away from, nuclear weapons, and argue that allies become more likely to engage in nuclear behavior when they doubt the reliability of the security guarantees they receive from their major power patrons.
References
More filters
Book

Britain, Soviet Russia and the Collapse of the Versailles Order, 1919-1939

TL;DR: The period of persuasion between British strategic foreign policy and Soviet Russia, 1919-33, 1933-4: parallel interests? as mentioned in this paper, and a clash of sensibilities: January to June 1935 4 Complications and choices: July 1935-February 1936 5 Soviet Russian assertiveness: February 1936-July 1937 6 Chamberlain's interlude: May 1937-September 1938 7 Chamberlain as Buridan's ass: October 1938-September 1939 Conclusion
Book

The Games of July: Explaining the Great War

TL;DR: The Games of July as mentioned in this paper is a collection of game-theoretic models known as perfect deterrence theory for the First World War, which was developed and tested by Zagare to develop and test a theory of why deterrence failed catastrophically in July 1914.
Journal ArticleDOI

More Flies with Honey: Positive Economic Linkage in German Ostpolitik from Bismarck to Kohl

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that positive sanctions can potentially be more effective than negative sanctions, even in cases where contentious "high politics" issues are being negotiated, relations between the states concerned are tense and militarized, and the state being targeted with sanctions has substantial military power.