Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.
Citations
1 citations
1 citations
Cites background from "Probability of shock in the presenc..."
...Rf(t)1⁄4 1), we cannot expect a restrictive process such as blocking to take place, at least not as described by the Rescorla and Wagner (1972) model....
[...]
...Although one of the most relevant behavioural models in the field, that of Rescorla and Wagner (1972), expresses itself in the same way as an important rule in the ANN modelling field (i....
[...]
...Rescorla’s (1968) proposal is generally considered to be the best, although it has been criticized because of its random coupling of the NS and the CS....
[...]
...Although one of the most relevant behavioural models in the field, that of Rescorla and Wagner (1972), expresses itself in the same way as an important rule in the ANN modelling field (i.e. the Widrow–Hoff rule, LMS), an implementation that is completely within this model does not require this rule. Rules that are effective at the behavioural level may not be so at the synaptic level (unless only a single node is being used); in short, Rescorla and Wagner (1972) and Widrow–Hoff belong to different descriptive levels, and they must be treated as such....
[...]
1 citations
Cites background from "Probability of shock in the presenc..."
...Avoiding US-alone trials could be desirable because unpaired US presentations can impede classical conditioning (Hupka, Kwaterski, & Moore, 1970; Rescorla, 1968)....
[...]
1 citations
References
1,328 citations
301 citations
160 citations
44 citations
"Probability of shock in the presenc..." refers background in this paper
...Although such an account is plausible for the present data, it fails to explain the active inhibition of fear found by Rescorla and LoLordo (1965), Rescorla (1966), and Hammond (1967)....
[...]