Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.
Citations
49 citations
49 citations
49 citations
49 citations
Cites background from "Probability of shock in the presenc..."
...occurrence of the US (Rescorla, 1968; Wagner, 1969). In a related study, Rescorla (1968) showed that CS–US associations are highly sensitive not just to the co-occurrence (contiguity) between the CS and the US but also to their contingency, that is, whether or not the US is more likely to occur given that the CS is present relative to its likelihood given no CS....
[...]
...Kamin (1969). occurrence of the US (Rescorla, 1968; Wagner, 1969)....
[...]
...In a related study, Rescorla (1968) showed that CS–...
[...]
49 citations
Cites background or methods from "Probability of shock in the presenc..."
...Still more evidence of the importance of the predictiveness of the US in acquisition was provided by Rescorla [97] in an experiment in which several groups of animals received the same number of CS–US pairings, but different probabilities of the US in the absence of the CS....
[...]
...[142], and Rescorla [97] suggested that although the CS and the US may be presented with an otherwise effective degree of coincidence, learning can fail if the informational or predictive value of the CS regarding the occurrence of the US is low....
[...]
References
1,328 citations
301 citations
160 citations
44 citations
"Probability of shock in the presenc..." refers background in this paper
...Although such an account is plausible for the present data, it fails to explain the active inhibition of fear found by Rescorla and LoLordo (1965), Rescorla (1966), and Hammond (1967)....
[...]