Problèmes de linguistique générale
About: This article is published in Language.The article was published on 1968-03-01. It has received 1838 citations till now.
Citations
More filters
Dissertation•
12 Nov 2012
12 citations
01 Dec 2004
TL;DR: Une modelisation capable of rendre compte des differentes dimensions temporelles portees par un document isabelle ainsi ouvrir des perspectives a ceux qui auront a concevoir des bibliotheques numeriques.
Abstract: Cet article propose une modelisation capable de rendre compte des differentes dimensions temporelles portees par un document. Apres la definition de la notion de document, nous introduisons trois univers: l’univers social, l’univers documentaire et l’univers du discours. Chacun d’eux contient sa propre dimension temporelle. Nous pensons ainsi ouvrir des perspectives a ceux qui auront a concevoir des bibliotheques numeriques.
12 citations
Cites background from "Problèmes de linguistique générale"
...Le lecteur qui souhaiterait connaître l’état de la réflexion en la matière peut consulter les travaux de philosophes comme Michel Foucault (Foucault, 1969) et Paul Ricœur (Ricœur, 2000), et aussi ceux de linguistes comme Emile Benvéniste (Benvéniste, 1966) ou Catherine Fuchs (Fuchs et Léonard, 1979)....
[...]
...…lecteur qui souhaiterait connaître l’état de la réflexion en la matière peut consulter les travaux de philosophes comme Michel Foucault (Foucault, 1969) et Paul Ricœur (Ricœur, 2000), et aussi ceux de linguistes comme Emile Benvéniste (Benvéniste, 1966) ou Catherine Fuchs (Fuchs et Léonard, 1979)....
[...]
TL;DR: The aesthetics of the between as discussed by the authors includes a phenomenological aesthetic object along with a subject along with the aesthetic object in addition to the experience of spatial context, the within-which of the museum, the gallery, the where of the plaza or boulevard, even the immediate mediation of the nonspace of the internet: the acting of in-action and interaction, the a-social sociality of media.
Abstract: The ‘aesthetics of the between’ includes a phenomenological aesthetics of the subject along with the aesthetic object In addition to the aestheticised subject, phenomenological reflection on the between meets the object found as it is along with the experience of spatial context, the within-which of the museum, the gallery, the where of the plaza or boulevard, even the immediate mediation of the nonspace of the internet: the acting of in-action and interaction, the a-social sociality of ‘media’ Focusing on painting and sculpture as well as literature and philosophy, the aesthetics of the between is at work in the encounter with beauty in life as expressed in lived power and experienced dimensionality of the art world and it illuminates the erotic This is the ‘beautiful’ in the work of Alexander Nehamas, ‘between’ the beautiful for Susan Sontag and Thomas Mann, but it can also be reflected in the staged-kitsch work of Jeff Koons, as in Hans-Georg Gadamer's high culture reflections on Plato and R
12 citations
TL;DR: It is shown that each text type is characterized by specific means to create anaphoric cohesion, and from an ontogenetic point of view, one can observe important changes in the explanation.
Abstract: Until now, there has been no study which has systematically compared anaphoric procedures used by children in different text types. Studies concentrated on sentence level or analyzed only stories. The present article describes the anaphoric procedures used in four text types (argumentation, explanation, account of a recent personal experience, and story) written by children 10, 12, and 14 years old. It shows that each text type is characterized by specific means to create anaphoric cohesion. From an ontogenetic point of view, one can observe important changes in the explanation. For the other text types, no important differences appear.
12 citations