scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies that will help improve the quality of decision-making in the design and testing of complex interventions.
Abstract
Process evaluation is an essential part of designing and testing complex interventions. New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework

TL;DR: A theoretical framework of acceptability consists of seven component constructs: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy that can inform assessment tools and evaluations of the acceptability of new or existing interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance

TL;DR: JBl received funding from NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol and by the MRC ConDuCT-II Hub (Collaboration and innovation for Difficult and Complex randomised controlled Trials In Invasive procedures).
Journal ArticleDOI

Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

TL;DR: Evidence from this meta-analysis suggests that recent intervention programs for burnout in physicians were associated with small benefits that may be boosted by adoption of organization-directed approaches, providing support for the view that burnout is a problem of the whole health care organization, rather than individuals.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change Interventions

TL;DR: How to implement the person-based approach to digital interventions is described, illustrating the process with examples of the insights gained from the experience of carrying out over a thousand interviews with users, while developing public health and illness management interventions that have proven effective in trials involving tens of thousands of users.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

TL;DR: This article seeks to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ, and delineates the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena.
Book

Diffusion of Innovations

TL;DR: A history of diffusion research can be found in this paper, where the authors present a glossary of developments in the field of Diffusion research and discuss the consequences of these developments.
Book

Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

TL;DR: This book discusses writing and Evaluating Mixed Methods Research, and the importance of knowing the structure of the writing so that it Relates to the Designs Evaluating a Mixed Methods Study Within Designs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diffusion of Innovations

Journal ArticleDOI

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

TL;DR: The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
Related Papers (5)