scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessDissertationDOI

Processus d'apprentissage, savoirs complexes et traitement de l'information : un modèle théorique à l'usage des praticiens, entre sciences cognitives, didactique et philosophie des sciences.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Cherchant et al. as mentioned in this paper propose a modele allosterique, which is an interface between the sciences of education, the sciences cognitives, and the philosophy des sciences.
Abstract
Cherchant a etablir un pont theorique et pratique entre les sciences de l'education, les sciences cognitives et la philosophie des sciences, la these developpe un modele didactique a l'interface entre ces disciplines : le modele allosterique de l'apprendre initie et developpe par Giordan (1988) et al. (1992), qui s'inscrit dans le paradigme des theories du changement conceptuel. Nourri par les travaux recents des psychologues cognitifs sur les processus d'apprentissage tels que les theories du recyclage neuronal (Dehaene, 2007) ou de l'inhibition cerebrale (Houde & Tzourio-Mazoyer, 2003), ainsi que sur diverses theories relatives a l'elaboration de la pensee telles que l'economie comportementale (Tversky & Kahnernan, 1982) ou le modele-cadre SRK (Rasmussen, 1990), ce modele developpe et precise le concept d’allosterie a travers la description et la formalisation des processus de deconstruction-reconstruction des conceptions, qui ont lieu lors des apprentissages complexes. De la phase de theorisation du modele, effectuee par un recours aux formalismes de la reactivite chimique en accord avec la metaphore initiale de l'allosterie, il est possible de deduire divers environnements didactiques operatoires et feconds pour le praticien de l'enseignement et de la mediation scientifiques. Ces previsions theoriques sont alors mises a l'epreuve de l'experimentation didactique a travers une recherche de terrain centree sur la notion d'experience contre-intuitive (Eastes & Pellaud, 2004) menee aupres de differents types de publics.

read more

Citations
More filters

Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Differences, games, and pluralism

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the implications of individual differences in performance for each of the four explanations of the normative/descriptive gap, including performance errors, computational limitations, wrong norm being applied by the experimenter, and a different construal of the task by the subject.

Recalling routes around London: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers

TL;DR: In this article, positron emission tomography (PET) was used to examine the neural substrates of topographical memory retrieval in licensed London taxi drivers of many years experience while they recalled complex routes around the city.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cortical Representations of Symbols, Objects, and Faces Are Pruned Back during Early Childhood

TL;DR: The categories "faces" and "symbols" doubly dissociate in the fusiform gyrus before children can read and the development of category-specific responses in young children depends on cortical responses to nonpreferred categories that decrease as preferred category knowledge is acquired.
Journal ArticleDOI

Children's emotion processing: relations to emotionality and aggression.

TL;DR: The results suggest the multifaceted manner in which children's emotion experiences may influence the development of aggressive tendencies.

Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Differences, games, and pluralism

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the implications of individual differences in performance for each of the four explanations of the normative/descriptive gap, including performance errors, computational limitations, wrong norm being applied by the experimenter, and a different construal of the task by the subject.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants.

TL;DR: It is argued that the body of data supports a very different proposal: humans possess a specialized mental mechanism for number, one which the authors share with other species and which has evolved through natural selection.