scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessDissertationDOI

Processus d'apprentissage, savoirs complexes et traitement de l'information : un modèle théorique à l'usage des praticiens, entre sciences cognitives, didactique et philosophie des sciences.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Cherchant et al. as mentioned in this paper propose a modele allosterique, which is an interface between the sciences of education, the sciences cognitives, and the philosophy des sciences.
Abstract
Cherchant a etablir un pont theorique et pratique entre les sciences de l'education, les sciences cognitives et la philosophie des sciences, la these developpe un modele didactique a l'interface entre ces disciplines : le modele allosterique de l'apprendre initie et developpe par Giordan (1988) et al. (1992), qui s'inscrit dans le paradigme des theories du changement conceptuel. Nourri par les travaux recents des psychologues cognitifs sur les processus d'apprentissage tels que les theories du recyclage neuronal (Dehaene, 2007) ou de l'inhibition cerebrale (Houde & Tzourio-Mazoyer, 2003), ainsi que sur diverses theories relatives a l'elaboration de la pensee telles que l'economie comportementale (Tversky & Kahnernan, 1982) ou le modele-cadre SRK (Rasmussen, 1990), ce modele developpe et precise le concept d’allosterie a travers la description et la formalisation des processus de deconstruction-reconstruction des conceptions, qui ont lieu lors des apprentissages complexes. De la phase de theorisation du modele, effectuee par un recours aux formalismes de la reactivite chimique en accord avec la metaphore initiale de l'allosterie, il est possible de deduire divers environnements didactiques operatoires et feconds pour le praticien de l'enseignement et de la mediation scientifiques. Ces previsions theoriques sont alors mises a l'epreuve de l'experimentation didactique a travers une recherche de terrain centree sur la notion d'experience contre-intuitive (Eastes & Pellaud, 2004) menee aupres de differents types de publics.

read more

Citations
More filters

Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Differences, games, and pluralism

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the implications of individual differences in performance for each of the four explanations of the normative/descriptive gap, including performance errors, computational limitations, wrong norm being applied by the experimenter, and a different construal of the task by the subject.

Recalling routes around London: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers

TL;DR: In this article, positron emission tomography (PET) was used to examine the neural substrates of topographical memory retrieval in licensed London taxi drivers of many years experience while they recalled complex routes around the city.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond conceptual change learning in science education: focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors advocate a shift in focus of conceptual change learning research in order to address the frequently encountered problems of students being unable to utilize school-learned science in different contexts, and of students forgetting what they have learned in a short time after initial instruction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigating a grade 11 student's evolving conceptions of heat and temperature

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on one student's cognitive and affective changes which occurred during the Grade 11 topic of heat and temperature, using an inquiry approach coupled with concept substitution strategies aimed at restructuring alternative conceptions identified using pretests.

Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models

TL;DR: In this paper, a discussion of the requirement for different types of models for representing performance at the skill-, rule-, and knowledge-based levels, together with a review of the different levels in terms of signals, signs, and symbols is presented.