Pruning SIFT & SURF for Efficient Clustering of Near-duplicate Images
Citations
10 citations
Cites background from "Pruning SIFT & SURF for Efficient C..."
...The preliminary clustering results on the publicly available California-ND dataset containing nearduplicate images have been promising (see [7])....
[...]
4 citations
3 citations
Cites background from "Pruning SIFT & SURF for Efficient C..."
...Although compared to SIFT and SURF, the image features generated for any given image collection with the Stacked-Autoencoder is considerably less, when the image collection is large, the number of image features generated using Stacked Autoencoder may still be numerous enough to cause lengthy computation during the implementation of the PSO clustering [59]....
[...]
...In [8] the authors demonstrated that the opportunity to change the number of layers and the number of neurons in each layer of a Deep Learning algorithm allows the feature extraction process to be adaptable to the content diversity of the image collection during BOVW modelling, thus generating image feature vectors whose dimension guarantees optimum discrimination, unlike the fixed 128 dimensions of Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and 64 dimensions of Speeded-Up Robust Feature (SURF) [57, 58, 59]....
[...]
...An important advantage of the application of Deep Feature learning at this stage is the opportunity to control the number of image features to be collected from each image in the collection to be processed thus avoiding excessive computational overhead, commonly associated with sparse image features such as SIFT or SURF where the number of image features per image is not predetermined or in Dense-SIFT where the number of features per image can be more than 10,000 with no means of controlling the number of image features....
[...]
...Although the time taken is higher than the time taken to complete the unsupervised categorisation with SURF features due to the time taken to train the Stacked-Autoencoder, the higher accuracy recorded by Stacked Autoencoder confirms its better efficiency....
[...]
References
163 citations
"Pruning SIFT & SURF for Efficient C..." refers background in this paper
...Many researchers have reduced the dimension of the SIFT descriptor [12, 13]....
[...]
74 citations
"Pruning SIFT & SURF for Efficient C..." refers background in this paper
...Moreover, the cardinality of the keypoint set can be reduced by raising the keypoint inclusion threshold value [11]....
[...]
...In general, the cardinality of keypoint set is in the order of 10(3) to 10(4) (depends on image size and content) [11]....
[...]
43 citations
"Pruning SIFT & SURF for Efficient C..." refers methods in this paper
...The list of alterations similar to that of the works in [22] is described in Table 2....
[...]
36 citations
"Pruning SIFT & SURF for Efficient C..." refers background in this paper
...near-duplicate images (with slightly varying viewpoints) resulting in total 150 photos are chosen from California-ND dataset [21]....
[...]
20 citations
"Pruning SIFT & SURF for Efficient C..." refers background in this paper
...The non-maximal suppression algorithm enhanced the recognition of spatially distributed features [10]....
[...]