scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The second edition of Public Management Reform as mentioned in this paper provides an unparalleled synthesis of developments in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK, the USA, and the European Commission.
Abstract
Since its publication in 2000, Public Management Reform has established itself as the standard text in the field, presenting a comparative analysis of recent changes in Public Management and Public Administration in a range of countries in Europe, North America, and Australasia. This completely rewritten second edition radically expands, develops, and updates the original. Two countries have been added to the comparison (making twelve countries in all) and a much fuller treatment has been provided of the European Commission (including a commentary on the recent reforms led by Vice-President Kinnock). Empirical data has been brought up to date, so as to cover many key developments of the last few years. The theoretical framework of the book has been further developed, including a challenging new interpretation of the trends in continental Europe, which are seen here as markedly different from the Anglo-American style 'New Public Management'. This second edition provides an unparalleled synthesis of developments in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK, the USA, and the European Commission. It is organized in an integrated format, within an overall theoretical framework that identifies the main pressures for, and trajectories of, change. It includes a multi-dimensional analysis of the results of reform, and a chapter reflecting on the dynamic relationship between management reform and politics. Extensive appendices provide an invaluable information resource for students.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance

TL;DR: The digital-era governance (DEG) movement as mentioned in this paper aims to reintegrate functions into the governmental sphere, adopting holistic and needs-oriented structures, and progressing digitalization of administrative processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

The New Public Governance? 1

TL;DR: More than a decade has passed since the publication of Christopher Hood's influential piece that codified the nature of the New Public Management (NPM) (Hood 1991).
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding Governance: Ten Years On:

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors reassess the argument in Understanding Governance (1997) and present a decentred answer to the question of where we go from here, arguing that the analysis of governance should focus on beliefs, practices, traditions and dilemmas.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational Performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the impact of innovation on organizational performance by analyzing innovative activity in a panel of 428 public service organizations in the UK over four years and found that consistency in adopting the same composition of innovation types over the years has no effect, and divergence from the industry norm in adopting innovation types could possibly be beneficial to organizational performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy

TL;DR: In recent decades, a number of changes in the forms and mechanisms of governance by which institutional and orga- nizational societal sectors and spheres are governed, as well as in the location of governance from where command, administration, management and control of societal institutions and spheres were conducted as mentioned in this paper.