Qualitative research & evaluation methods
Citations
48 citations
48 citations
Cites methods from "Qualitative research & evaluation m..."
...Qualitative data were analyzed via a content analysis in which categories of responses or themes were identified within responses to the open-ended questions (Miles and Huberman 1994; Patton 2002)....
[...]
...…kids who have cancer or a sibling with cancer Camp features The counselors The food The camp staff Qualitative data were analyzed via a content analysis in which categories of responses or themes were identified within responses to the open-ended questions (Miles and Huberman 1994; Patton 2002)....
[...]
...Both inductive and deductive analyses were used to examine the data (Patton 2002)....
[...]
47 citations
Cites background or methods from "Qualitative research & evaluation m..."
...The rationale was that the results from the research were grounded in the empirical world and from this theory was built rather than tested (Patton, 2002)....
[...]
...Thus, a phenomenological approach focusing on ‘descriptions of what people experience and how it is that they experience what they experience’ (Patton, 2002 , p....
[...]
...Patterns and themes were identified using ‘cross-case analysis’, cutting across individual experiences (Patton, 2002, 57) and manually coded, initially into broad categories, which is often referred to as ‘open coding’ (Jordon and Gibson, 2004, p. 226)....
[...]
...Thus, a phenomenological approach focusing on ‘descriptions of what people experience and how it is that they experience what they experience’ (Patton, 2002, p. 107) was chosen....
[...]
47 citations
Cites background from "Qualitative research & evaluation m..."
...If not, how do you usually do it?) in order to identify and understand potential representative practices, as suggested by (Lutters and Seaman, 2007; Patton, 2002)....
[...]
47 citations
Cites methods from "Qualitative research & evaluation m..."
...A purposive sampling method (Patton 2002) was used to select the students because it was important to have mixed-ability groups—that is, students who found the adjustment to university challenging and, as a result, failed one or more of their subjects and students who adjusted successfully and passed all their subjects....
[...]
...A purposive sampling method (Patton 2002) was used to select the students because it was important to have mixed-ability groups—that is, students who found the adjustment to university challenging and, as a result, failed one or more of their subjects and students who adjusted successfully and…...
[...]