Qualitative research & evaluation methods
TL;DR: In this paper, conceptual issues and themes on qualitative research and evaluaton methods including: qualitative data, triangulated inquiry, qualitative inquiry, constructivism, constructionism, complexity (chaos) theory, qualitative designs and data collection, fieldwork strategies, interviewing, tape-recording, ethical issues, analysis, interpretation and reporting, observations vs. perceived impacts and utilisation-focused evaluation reporting.
Abstract: This book explains clearly conceptual issues and themes on qualitative research and evaluaton methods including: qualitative data, triangulated inquiry, qualitative inquiry, constructivism, constructionism, Complexity (chaos) theory, qualitative designs and data collection, fieldwork strategies, interviewing, tape-recording, ethical issues, analysis, interpretation and reporting, observations vs. perceived impacts and utilisation-focused evaluation reporting.
...read more
Citations
379 citations
Cites background from "Qualitative research & evaluation m..."
...The interviews followed a purposive sampling approach (e.g., Eisenhardt, 1989; Patton, 2002; Wallendorf & Belk, 1989), where the content of eachdiscussionwasbuilt on previous responses....
[...]
355 citations
Cites background or methods from "Qualitative research & evaluation m..."
...According to Patton (2002), qualitative inquiry typically focuses in-depth on relatively small samples, selected purposefully (whereas quantitative methods focus on larger samples selected randomly)....
[...]
...…parameters set in Table IV, and consistent with a grounded theory approach, the authors delved into careful content analysis of the ten case studies that have been compiled, identifying convergence, divergence, recurring regularities, internal homogeneity, and external heterogeneity (Patton, 2002)....
[...]
...…from qualitative research are considered to have more to do with the information derived from cases selected than with sample size as ‘‘there are no rules for sample size in qualitative inquiry; sample size depends on what you want to know and the purpose of the inquiry’’ (Patton, 2002, p. 244)....
[...]
...As per Patton (2002), qualitative findings are judged by their substantive significance, which is determined in turn by how solid, coherent, and consistent the evidence is, and how the findings increase or deepen our understanding of the phenomenon in question, as well as the extent to which the…...
[...]
...‘‘The logic and power of purposeful sampling lie in selecting information rich cases to study in depth; Information rich cases are those from which one can learn a great deal about issues of central importance to the purpose of the inquiry’’ (Patton, 2002, p. 230)....
[...]
348 citations
346 citations
Cites methods from "Qualitative research & evaluation m..."
...At the heart of this methodology lies the interplay of making inductions, deriving concepts from the data, and making deductions directed at hypothesizing the relationships between concepts (Patton, 2002, p. 454)....
[...]
333 citations
Cites methods from "Qualitative research & evaluation m..."
...Responses to the four questions were analyzed by the first author through the use of qualitative methods described by Guba and Lincoln (1992), Strauss and Corbin (1994), and Patton (1987, 2002)....
[...]