scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Quality evaluation of smartphone applications for laboratory medicine

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
App designed for patients, are of the poorest quality, considering the total quality of the content and information they provide, estimated using the MARS tool.
Abstract
Background Many of the mobile applications (apps) used for delivering health interventions involve laboratory medicine data. This survey was conducted to search the online market for health apps that manage laboratory medicine data. The aim was to review them and perform a quality evaluation. Methods Apps search criteria were "Lab results blood work", "Lab results", and "Health apps". After the stepwise exclusion process, 52 selected apps were downloaded and analyzed. For review and content analysis of the apps, a multidimensional tool for classifying and rating the quality of mobile health apps - Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), was used. Results Selected apps were classified into five categories according to their intended use by patients or physicians, and the type of data engaged. Spearman's correlation analysis found significant correlations between MARS individual scoring items, as with the subjective quality and number of technical aspects. Kruskal-Wallis analysis showed a significant difference in the number of technical aspects employed, MARS engagement and informational quality score items, total score, and subjective quality. The lowest values for all of these items were in the category of apps designed for patients, and the post hoc test showed that the difference was statistically significant between this and the values in all other categories. Conclusions Apps designed for patients, are of the poorest quality, considering the total quality of the content and information they provide, estimated using the MARS tool. This estimation needs to be validated for laboratory medicine apps, and eventually modified after consideration of specific quality benchmarks.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Identification and Evaluation of Methodologies to Assess the Quality of Mobile Health Apps in High-, Low-, and Middle-Income Countries: Rapid Review.

TL;DR: In this paper, a rapid review aims to identify current methodologies in the literature to assess the quality of mHealth apps, understand what aspects of quality these methodologies address, determine what input has been made by authors from low and middle-income countries (LMICs), and examine the applicability of such methods in LMICs.
Journal ArticleDOI

The end of Laboratory Medicine as we know it

TL;DR: The conference will consider the impact that the on-going digitalization of technologies and a digitalized society will have on the medical laboratory in future health care, and contend that such changes enable Digital Health that will be disruptive for Laboratory Medicine as the authors know it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mobile Applications (Apps) to Support the Hepatitis C Treatment: A Systematic Search in App Stores.

TL;DR: This systematic search found gaps in apps to support the HCV treatment; 12 apps were identified in this study and only one app achieved a good quality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preparing Laboratories for Interconnected Health Care

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe necessary changes and points to potential challenges on a technical, content, and organizational level for electronic laboratory reports to become machine-readable and interpretable.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

TL;DR: A practical guideline for clinical researchers to choose the correct form of ICC is provided and the best practice of reporting ICC parameters in scientific publications is suggested.
Journal ArticleDOI

Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial

TL;DR: This paper provides an overview of methodological issues related to the assessment of IRR with a focus on study design, selection of appropriate statistics, and the computation, interpretation, and reporting of some commonly-used IRR statistics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps

TL;DR: The MARS is a simple, objective, and reliable tool for classifying and assessing the quality of mobile health apps and can also be used to provide a checklist for the design and development of new high quality health apps.
Journal ArticleDOI

Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination

TL;DR: Many incompletely developed rating instruments continue to appear on websites providing health information, even when the organisations that gave rise to those instruments no longer exist, a systematic review of the reliability and validity of such rating instruments showed.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Lot of Action, But Not in the Right Direction: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Smartphone Applications for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Cancer

TL;DR: There are hundreds of cancer-focused apps with the potential to enhance efforts to promote behavior change, to monitor a host of symptoms and physiological indicators of disease, and to provide real-time supportive interventions, conveniently and at low cost, but there is a lack of evidence on their utility, effectiveness, and safety.
Related Papers (5)