Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation
03 Mar 2005-The New England Journal of Medicine (Massachusetts Medical Society)-Vol. 352, Iss: 9, pp 875-883
TL;DR: Quantitative grading of mitral Regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation and patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery.
Abstract: background The clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation is poorly defined, and the treatment is uncertain. We studied the effect on the outcome of quantifying mitral regurgitation according to recent guidelines. methods We prospectively enrolled 456 patients (mean [±SD] age, 63±14 years; 63 percent men; ejection fraction, 70±8 percent) with asymptomatic organic mitral regurgitation, quantified according to current recommendations (regurgitant volume, 66±40 ml per beat; effective regurgitant orifice, 40±27 mm 2 ). results The estimated five-year rates (±SE) of death from any cause, death from cardiac causes, and cardiac events (death from cardiac causes, heart failure, or new atrial fibrillation) with medical management were 22±3 percent, 14±3 percent, and 33±3 percent, respectively. Independent determinants of survival were increasing age, the presence of diabetes, and increasing effective regurgitant orifice (adjusted risk ratio per 10-mm 2 increment, 1.18; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.30; P<0.01), the predictive power of which superseded all other qualitative and quantitative measures of regurgitation. Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm 2 had a five-year survival rate that was lower than expected on the basis of U.S. Census data (58±9 percent vs. 78 percent, P=0.03). As compared with patients with a regurgitant orifice of less than 20 mm 2 , those with an orifice of at least 40 mm 2 had an increased risk of death from any cause (adjusted risk ratio, 2.90; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.33 to 6.32; P<0.01), death from cardiac causes (adjusted risk ratio, 5.21; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.98 to 14.40; P<0.01), and cardiac events (adjusted risk ratio, 5.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 3.07 to 10.56; P<0.01). Cardiac surgery was ultimately performed in 232 patients and was independently associated with improved survival (adjusted risk ratio, 0.28; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.55; P<0.01). conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm 2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: It is important that the medical profession play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies as they are introduced in the detection, management, and management of diseases.
Abstract: PREAMBLE......e4
APPENDIX 1......e121
APPENDIX 2......e122
APPENDIX 3......e124
REFERENCES......e124
It is important that the medical profession play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies as they are introduced in the detection, management,
8,362 citations
TL;DR: The medical profession should play a central role in evaluating evidence related to drugs, devices, and procedures for detection, management, and prevention of disease.
4,050 citations
TL;DR: Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents aim to present management recommendations based on all of the relevant evidence on a particular subject in order to help physicians select the best possible management strategies for the individual patient suffering from a specific condition, taking into account the impact on outcome and also the risk–benefit ratio of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure.
Abstract: Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents aim to present management recommendations based on all of the relevant evidence on a particular subject in order to help physicians select the best possible management strategies for the individual patient suffering from a specific condition, taking into account the impact on outcome and also the risk–benefit ratio of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. Numerous studies have demonstrated that patient outcomes improve when guideline recommendations, based on the rigorous assessment of evidence-based research, are applied in clinical practice.
A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and also by other organizations or related societies. The profusion of documents can put at stake the authority and credibility of guidelines, particularly if discrepancies appear between different documents on the same issue, as this can lead to confusion in the minds of physicians. In order to avoid these pitfalls, the ESC and other organizations have issued recommendations for formulating and issuing Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents. The ESC recommendations for guidelines production can be found on the ESC website.1 It is beyond the scope of this preamble to recall all but the basic rules.
In brief, the ESC appoints experts in the field to carry out a comprehensive review of the literature, with a view to making a critical evaluation of the use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and assessing the risk–benefit ratio of the therapies recommended for management and/or prevention of a given condition. Estimates of expected health outcomes are included, where data exist. The strength of evidence for or against particular procedures or treatments is weighed according to predefined scales for grading recommendations and levels of evidence, as outlined in what follows.
The Task Force members of the writing panels, …
3,707 citations
Cites background or methods from "Quantitative determinants of the ou..."
...Our knowledge of the natural history of chronic MR has greatly improved due to recent observational studies.(34,91,95,96) In asymptomatic MR, the estimated 5 year rates (+ standard error) of death from any cause, death from cardiac causes, and cardiac events (death from cardiac causes, heart failure, or new AF) with medical management were 22+ 3, 14+ 3, and 33+ 3%, respectively....
[...]
...The two quantitative methods of evaluating regurgitant volume and calculating ERO are useful in experienced hands.(90,91) The criteria for defining severe organic MR are described in Table 2....
[...]
...In asymptomatic MR, the estimated 5 year rates (+ standard error) of death from any cause, death from cardiac causes, and cardiac events (death from cardiac causes, heart failure, or new AF) with medical management were 22+ 3, 14+ 3, and 33+ 3%, respectively.(91) In addition to symptoms, age, atrial fibrillation, degree of MR (particularly ERO), left atrial dilatation, LV dilatation, and low LVEF are all predictors of poor outcome....
[...]
TL;DR: Guidelines summarize and evaluate all evidence available on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome.
Abstract: ACE
: angiotensin-converting enzyme
AF
: atrial fibrillation
aPTT
: activated partial thromboplastin time
AR
: aortic regurgitation
ARB
: angiotensin receptor blockers
AS
: aortic stenosis
AVR
: aortic valve replacement
BNP
: B-type natriuretic peptide
BSA
: body surface area
CABG
: coronary artery bypass grafting
CAD
: coronary artery disease
CMR
: cardiac magnetic resonance
CPG
: Committee for Practice Guidelines
CRT
: cardiac resynchronization therapy
CT
: computed tomography
EACTS
: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
ECG
: electrocardiogram
EF
: ejection fraction
EROA
: effective regurgitant orifice area
ESC
: European Society of Cardiology
EVEREST
: (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge REpair STudy)
HF
: heart failure
INR
: international normalized ratio
LA
: left atrial
LMWH
: low molecular weight heparin
LV
: left ventricular
LVEF
: left ventricular ejection fraction
LVEDD
: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter
LVESD
: left ventricular end-systolic diameter
MR
: mitral regurgitation
MS
: mitral stenosis
MSCT
: multi-slice computed tomography
NYHA
: New York Heart Association
PISA
: proximal isovelocity surface area
PMC
: percutaneous mitral commissurotomy
PVL
: paravalvular leak
RV
: right ventricular
rtPA
: recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
SVD
: structural valve deterioration
STS
: Society of Thoracic Surgeons
TAPSE
: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
TAVI
: transcatheter aortic valve implantation
TOE
: transoesophageal echocardiography
TR
: tricuspid regurgitation
TS
: tricuspid stenosis
TTE
: transthoracic echocardiography
UFH
: unfractionated heparin
VHD
: valvular heart disease
3DE
: three-dimensional echocardiography
Guidelines summarize and evaluate all evidence available, at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well …
3,608 citations
TL;DR: In this article, Levine and O'Gara proposed a new chairperson for FAHA, who was elected by a majority of the FAHA board members, including Birtcher, Bozkurt and Halperin.
2,812 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: The method of classifying comorbidity provides a simple, readily applicable and valid method of estimating risk of death fromComorbid disease for use in longitudinal studies and further work in larger populations is still required to refine the approach.
39,961 citations
TL;DR: It is important that the medical profession play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies as they are introduced in the detection, management, and management of diseases.
Abstract: PREAMBLE......e4
APPENDIX 1......e121
APPENDIX 2......e122
APPENDIX 3......e124
REFERENCES......e124
It is important that the medical profession play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies as they are introduced in the detection, management,
8,362 citations
TL;DR: It is the opinion that current technology justifies the clinical use of the quantitative two-dimensional methods described in this article and the routine reporting of left ventricular ejection fraction, diastolic volume, mass, and wall motion score.
Abstract: We have presented recommendations for the optimum acquisition of quantitative two-dimensional data in the current echocardiographic environment. It is likely that advances in imaging may enhance or supplement these approaches. For example, three-dimensional reconstruction methods may greatly augment the accuracy of volume determination if they become more efficient. The development of three-dimensional methods will depend in turn on vastly improved transthoracic resolution similar to that now obtainable by transesophageal echocardiography. Better resolution will also make the use of more direct methods of measuring myocardial mass practical. For example, if the epicardium were well resolved in the long-axis apical views, the myocardial shell volume could be measured directly by the biplane method of discs rather than extrapolating myocardial thickness from a single short-axis view. At present, it is our opinion that current technology justifies the clinical use of the quantitative two-dimensional methods described in this article. When technically feasible, and if resources permit, we recommend the routine reporting of left ventricular ejection fraction, diastolic volume, mass, and wall motion score.
8,255 citations
TL;DR: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Nomenclature and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Valvular Regurgitation developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology EchOCardiography Committee.
3,769 citations
TL;DR: Advances in the treatment of hypertension, myocardial ischemia, and valvular heart disease during the four decades of observation did not translate into appreciable improvements in overall survival after the onset of CHF in this large, unselected population.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Relatively limited epidemiological data are available regarding the prognosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) and temporal changes in survival after its onset in a population-based setting. METHODS AND RESULTS Proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the effects of selected clinical variables on survival after the onset of CHF among 652 members of the Framingham Heart Study (51% men; mean age, 70.0 +/- 10.8 years) who developed CHF between 1948 and 1988. Subjects were older at the diagnosis of heart failure in the later decades of this study (mean age at heart failure diagnosis, 57.3 +/- 7.6 years in the 1950s, 65.9 +/- 7.9 years in the 1960s, 71.6 +/- 9.4 years in the 1970s, and 76.4 +/- 10.0 years in the 1980s; p < 0.001). Median survival after the onset of heart failure was 1.7 years in men and 3.2 years in women. Overall, 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 57% and 25% in men and 64% and 38% in women, respectively. Survival was better in women than in men (age-adjusted hazards ratio for mortality, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77). Mortality increased with advancing age in both sexes (hazards ratio for men, 1.27 per decade of age; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47; hazards ratio for women, 1.61 per decade of age; 95% CI, 1.37-1.90). Adjusting for age, there was no significant temporal change in the prognosis of CHF during the 40 years of observation (hazards ratio for men for mortality, 1.08 per calendar decade; 95% CI, 0.92-1.27; hazards ratio for women for mortality, 1.02 per calendar decade; 95% CI, 0.83-1.26). CONCLUSIONS CHF remains highly lethal, with better prognosis in women and in younger individuals. Advances in the treatment of hypertension, myocardial ischemia, and valvular heart disease during the four decades of observation did not translate into appreciable improvements in overall survival after the onset of CHF in this large, unselected population.
1,836 citations