Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaking of global capitalist governance after the Washington Consensus
Citations
27 citations
26 citations
26 citations
26 citations
25 citations
Cites background from "Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..."
...Between the neoliberal market-fundamentalist approach and China’s state-capitalist approach, Japan’s ‘state-guided’ approach reflects a continuation of its long-standing AREA DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY interventionism in support of the private sector, at odds with the neoclassical (post-) Washington Consensus framing....
[...]
...The market-fundamentalist rationality of this post-Washington Consensus ‘good governance’ approach envisions that states play a limited role, restricted to establishing and enforcing the regulatory conditions for capitalist markets....
[...]
...But it was the World Bank’s neoliberal approach, rooted in the hegemony of American financial capitalism, that continued apace in the succeeding decades, notwithstanding the Japanese pushback, and broader critiques levelled at neoliberal globalization (and the Washington Consensus) in the wake of the 1997 and 2008 financial crises (Sheppard & Leitner, 2010).6 MDBs have since built on (post-)Washington Consensus strategies to push ‘market deepening’ in developing countries (Carroll, 2012) in order to achieve Development....
[...]
...Framed by competition between the neoliberal (post-)Washington Consensus and the state-capitalist ‘Beijing Consensus’ (Arrighi, 2007; Sheppard & Leitner, 2010), competing approaches to infrastructure financing highlight the mutual enframing of geopolitics and the meanings and relations of development (Slater, 1993)....
[...]
...…and broader critiques levelled at neoliberal globalization (and the Washington Consensus) in the wake of the 1997 and 2008 financial crises (Sheppard & Leitner, 2010).6 MDBs have since built on (post-)Washington Consensus strategies to push ‘market deepening’ in developing countries…...
[...]
References
15,146 citations
13,200 citations
10,062 citations
8,514 citations
"Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..." refers background in this paper
...…within nationstates of North Atlantic capitalism, dating back to the 18th century, between those propagating free markets and those seeking to protect society through ‘‘powerful institutions designed to check the action of the market relative to labor, land and money” (Polanyi, 2001 [1944], p. 79)....
[...]
8,455 citations
"Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..." refers background in this paper
...Given the attention devoted to analyzing globalization since 1980 as approximating Hayekian neoliberalism (e.g., Brenner, 2004; Brenner and Theodore, 2002; Harvey, 2006), it is important to interrogate whether the post-Washington consensus represents a significant departure from this model, at least for the third world, or simply a variation on it....
[...]
...While acknowledging that neoliberalism travelled to the US and the UK via Chile, the bulk of scholarship has focused on what happened thereafter (cf. Harvey, 2006; Peck and Tickell, 2002)....
[...]
...…attention devoted to analyzing globalization since 1980 as approximating Hayekian neoliberalism (e.g., Brenner, 2004; Brenner and Theodore, 2002; Harvey, 2006), it is important to interrogate whether the post-Washington consensus represents a significant departure from this model, at least for…...
[...]