Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaking of global capitalist governance after the Washington Consensus
Citations
218 citations
Cites background from "Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..."
...This view is core to the suggestion that the ordoliberal stance is ‘perhaps closest to post-Washington’ forms of governance (Sheppard and Leitner 2010: 188)....
[...]
...In their view ordoliberalism appears as an anti-capitalist alternative to neoliberalism: they argue that neoliberalism is procapitalist and anti-state, and that ordoliberalism is critical of capitalism and prostate (Sheppard and Leitner 2010: 188)....
[...]
...I doubt though that ‘its return’ will only entail ‘a more orderly, restrained form of market rule’ (Peck 2010: 275), in which the economy is ‘subject to controls’ (Sheppard and Leitner 2010: 188)....
[...]
205 citations
194 citations
166 citations
141 citations
Cites background from "Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..."
...…2011 joeg.oxfordjournals.org D ow nloaded from Swyngedouw, 1997; Rose, 1999; Larner, 2000; Brenner and Theodore, 2002; Peck and Tickell, 2002; Brenner, 2004; Jessop and Sum, 2006; Leitner et al., 2007; Peck and Theodore, 2007; Barnett et al., 2008; Brenner et al., 2010; Sheppard and Leitner, 2010)....
[...]
References
15,146 citations
13,200 citations
10,062 citations
8,514 citations
"Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..." refers background in this paper
...…within nationstates of North Atlantic capitalism, dating back to the 18th century, between those propagating free markets and those seeking to protect society through ‘‘powerful institutions designed to check the action of the market relative to labor, land and money” (Polanyi, 2001 [1944], p. 79)....
[...]
8,455 citations
"Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..." refers background in this paper
...Given the attention devoted to analyzing globalization since 1980 as approximating Hayekian neoliberalism (e.g., Brenner, 2004; Brenner and Theodore, 2002; Harvey, 2006), it is important to interrogate whether the post-Washington consensus represents a significant departure from this model, at least for the third world, or simply a variation on it....
[...]
...While acknowledging that neoliberalism travelled to the US and the UK via Chile, the bulk of scholarship has focused on what happened thereafter (cf. Harvey, 2006; Peck and Tickell, 2002)....
[...]
...…attention devoted to analyzing globalization since 1980 as approximating Hayekian neoliberalism (e.g., Brenner, 2004; Brenner and Theodore, 2002; Harvey, 2006), it is important to interrogate whether the post-Washington consensus represents a significant departure from this model, at least for…...
[...]