Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaking of global capitalist governance after the Washington Consensus
TL;DR: The post-Washington consensus, through which neoliberal global capitalist governance gained hegemony over the third world, entered a crisis in the late 1990s, triggered by the 1997 Asian financial crisis, and by contestations of neoliberal governance from global civil society as mentioned in this paper.
About: This article is published in Geoforum.The article was published on 2010-03-01. It has received 140 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Global governance & Washington Consensus.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: Hardt and Negri as discussed by the authors present a history of war and democracy in the age of empire, with a focus on the role of women and women in the process of war.
Abstract: Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. 2004. New York. Penguin Books. 448 pages. ISBN: 0143035592 (paper).
1,244 citations
TL;DR: In the special issue on mobilizing policy as mentioned in this paper, the authors contrast traditional approaches to policy transfer with an emerging body of work in the interdisciplinary field of critical policy studies, where the governing metaphors are those of mobility and mutation (rather than transfer, transit, and transaction).
807 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a theoretical and political critique of how the concept of resilience has been applied to places, based on three main points: First, the ecological concept of resilient...
Abstract: This paper provides a theoretical and political critique of how the concept of resilience has been applied to places. It is based upon three main points. First, the ecological concept of resilience...
735 citations
Cites background from "Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..."
...This provides a crucial supplement to neoliberal discourses (see Joseph, 2002), serving to fill an underlying void created by the privileging of market rationalities over social needs (Derrida, 1976; Sheppard and Leitner, 2010)....
[...]
TL;DR: The academic literature on urban policy and planning which explicitly links to Neo-liberalism is huge as mentioned in this paper, with an emphasis on journals of urban planning, urban geography, and urban studies.
378 citations
274 citations
References
More filters
Book Chapter•
01 Jan 2004
20 citations
"Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..." refers background in this paper
...The United Nations represented a different constellation of interests again, as its decision making is not dominated by the US and western Europe (although the World Bank has been influential throughout; White and Black, 2004, p. 11)....
[...]
TL;DR: The authors analyzes disagreements between J. M. Keynes and F. von Hayek on political and economic matters and shows that they were very close to each other as thinkers, whereas their disputes played an important role in the history of economic thought.
Abstract: The author analyzes disagreements between J. M. Keynes and F. von Hayek on political and economic matters. Using wide range of sources the author shows that Keynes and Hayek stood very close to each other as thinkers, whereas their disputes played an important role in the history of economic thought. The contribution of both theorists to the ideological justification of liberalism is considered.
16 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors pointed out that neither the globalization discourse nor the general equilibrium model acknowledge the institutional differences and social determinants of markets, because they are presented as homogenous and convergent.
Abstract: The processes associated with the inevitability of globalization are patently not market-driven; there is a social dimension to the so-called economic compulsion. Therefore, neither the globalization discourse nor the general equilibrium model acknowledges the institutional differences and social determinants of markets, because they are presented as homogenous and convergent. The inadequacy of the first generation of economic reforms associated with the Washington Consensus and also of the institutional emphasis of the second generation of reforms of the post-Washington Consensus highlighted a missing social and political dimension. Though their emphases vary and complement each other, no set of reforms acknowledges the vital political character of the situated agents in context, as both generations of reforms are oriented towards the harmonization of policies.
14 citations
"Quo vadis neoliberalism? The remaki..." refers background in this paper
...Without seeking to reify their consensual nature, it is possible, synthesizing across a variety of accounts, to identify five broad shifts (Fine, 2001; Montiel, 2007)....
[...]
01 Jan 2010
3 citations