scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Real Hypersurfaces of Complex Space Forms in Terms of Ricci $*$-Tensor

01 Dec 2002-Tokyo Journal of Mathematics (Publication Committee for the Tokyo Journal of Mathematics)-Vol. 25, Iss: 2, pp 473-483
TL;DR: In this article, the authors classified the $*$-Einstein real hypersurfaces in complex space forms such that the structure vector is a principal curvature vector and the principal curvatures of the hypersurface can be computed with the K\"ahler metric.
Abstract: It is known that there are no Einstein real hypersurfaces in complex space forms equipped with the K\"ahler metric. In the present paper we classified the $*$-Einstein real hypersurfaces $M$ in complex space forms $M_{n}(c)$ and such that the structure vector is a principal curvature vector.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
30 Jan 2023-Axioms
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors investigated the properties of a 3-dimensional Kenmotsu manifold satisfying certain curvature conditions endowed with Ricci solitons and showed that such a manifold is φ-Einstein.
Abstract: The present paper deals with the investigations of a Kenmotsu manifold satisfying certain curvature conditions endowed with 🟉-η-Ricci solitons. First we find some necessary conditions for such a manifold to be φ-Einstein. Then, we study the notion of 🟉-η-Ricci soliton on this manifold and prove some significant results related to this notion. Finally, we construct a nontrivial example of three-dimensional Kenmotsu manifolds to verify some of our results.

1 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, the authors characterized a class of contact metric manifolds admitting a conformal Ricci soliton and showed that these manifolds are locally isometric to the Riemannian of a flat manifold of constant curvature.
Abstract: The aim of this paper is characterize a class of contact metric manifolds admitting $\ast$-conformal Ricci soliton. It is shown that if a $(2n + 1)$-dimensional $N(k)$-contact metric manifold $M$ admits $\ast$-conformal Ricci soliton or $\ast$-conformal gradient Ricci soliton, then the manifold M is $\ast$-Ricci at and locally isometric to the Riemannian of a flat $(n + 1)$-dimensional manifold and an $n$-dimensional manifold of constant curvature 4 for $n > 1$ and flat for $n = 1$. Further, for the first case, the soliton vector field is conformal and for the $\ast$-gradient case, the potential function $f$ is either harmonic or satisfy a Poisson equation. Finally, an example is presented to support the results.

1 citations


Cites background from "Real Hypersurfaces of Complex Space..."

  • ...In 2002, Hamada [11] defined the ∗-Ricci tensor on real hypersurfaces of complex space forms by S∗(X,Y ) = g(Q∗X,Y ) = 1 2 (trace(φ ◦R(X,φY ))) for any vector fields X, Y on M , where Q∗ is the (1, 1) ∗-Ricci operator....

    [...]

  • ...[11] T. Hamada Real hypersurfaces of complex space forms in terms of Ricci ∗-tensor, Tokyo J. Math....

    [...]

  • ...In 2002, Hamada [11] defined the ∗-Ricci tensor on real hypersurfaces of complex space forms by...

    [...]

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied *-conformal η-Ricci solitons on α-cosymplectic manifolds and obtained several interesting results, such as the existence of a ∞ -M-projectively semisymmetric α-coarse manifold admitting a *-consistent Ricci soliton is an Einstein manifold.
Abstract: The object of this paper is to study *-conformal η-Ricci solitons on α-cosymplectic manifolds. First, α-cosymplectic manifolds admitting *-conformal η-Ricci solitons satisfying the conditions R(ξ, .) · S and S(ξ, .) · R = 0 are being studied. Further, α-cosymplectic manifolds admitting *-conformal η-Ricci solitons satisfying certain conditions on the M-projective curvature tensor are being considered and obtained several interesting results. Among others it is proved that a φ - M-projeectively semisymmetric α-cosymplectic manifold admitting a *-conformal η-Ricci soliton is an Einstein manifold. Finally, the existence of *-conformal η-Ricci soliton in an α-cosymplectic manifolds has been proved by a concrete example.

1 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a geometric classification of Sasakian manifolds that admit an almost ∗-Ricci soliton (RS) structure (g,ω,X) is presented.
Abstract: This article presents some results of a geometric classification of Sasakian manifolds (SM) that admit an almost ∗-Ricci soliton (RS) structure (g,ω,X). First, we show that a complete SM equipped with an almost ∗-RS with ω≠ const is a unit sphere. Then we prove that if an SM has an almost ∗-RS structure, whose potential vector is a Jacobi vector field on the integral curves of the characteristic vector field, then the manifold is a null or positive SM. Finally, we characterize those SM represented as almost ∗-RS, which are ∗-RS, ∗-Einstein or ∗-Ricci flat.

1 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors considered the problem of determining homogeneous real hypersurfaces in a complex projective space Pn(C) of complex dimension n(^>2) which are orbits under analytic subgroups of the projective unitary group PU(n-\\-\\)>.
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to determine those homogeneous real hypersurfaces in a complex projective space Pn(C) of complex dimension n(^>2) which are orbits under analytic subgroups of the projective unitary group PU(n-\\-\\)> and to give some characterizations of those hypersurfaces. In § 1 from each effective Hermitian orthogonal symmetric Lie algebra of rank two we construct an example of homogeneous real hypersurface in Pn(C)y which we shall call a model space in Pn(C). In §2 we show that the class of all homogeneous real hypersurfaces in Pn{C) that are orbits under analytic subgroups of PU(n-\\-l) is exhausted by all model spaces. In §§3 and 4 we give some conditions for a real hypersurface in Pn(C) to be an orbit under an analytic subgroup of PU(n-\\-l) and in the course of proof we obtain a rigidity theorem in Pn(C) analogous to one for hypersurfaces in a real space form. The author would like to express his hearty thanks to Professor T. Takahashi for valuable discussions with him and his constant encouragement, and to Professor M. Takeuchi who made an original complicated proof of Lemma 2.3 short and clear.

316 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the location of the focal points of a real submanifold is defined in terms of its second fundamental form, and the rank of a focal map onto a sheet of focal points corresponding to a principal curvature is computed using the Codazzi equation.
Abstract: Let M be a real submanifold of CPm, and let J denote the complex structure. We begin by finding a formula for the location of the focal points of M in terms of its second fundamental form. This takes a particularly tractable form when M is a complex submanifold or a real hypersurface on which Ji is a principal vector for each unit normal ( to M. The rank of the focal map onto a sheet of the focal set of M is also computed in terms of the second fundamental form. In the case of a real hypersurface on which JE is principal with corresponding principal curvature ,u, if the map onto a sheet of the focal set corresponding to ,u has constant rank, then that sheet is a complex submanifold over which M is a tube of constant radius (Theorem 1). The other sheets of the focal set of such a hypersurface are given a real manifold structure in Theorem 2. These results are then employed as major tools in obtaining two classifications of real hypersurfaces in cPm. First, there are no totally umbilic real hypersurfaces in cPm, but we show: THEOREM 3. Let M be a connected real hypersurface in CPm, m > 3, with at most two distinct principal curvatures at each point. Then M is an open subset of a geodesic hypersphere. Secondly, we show that there are no Einstein real hypersurfaces in cPm and characterize the geodesic hyperspheres and two other classes of hypersurfaces in terms of a slightly less stringent requirement on the Ricci tensor in Theorem 4. One of the first results in the geometry of submanifolds is that an umbilic hypersurface M in Euclidean space must be an open subset of a hyperplane or sphere. The proof goes as follows: assume that the shape operator is a scalar multiple of the identity, A = AX, and use the Codazzi equation to show that X is constant. Then either X = 0, in which case M lies on a hyperplane, or the focal points fx(x) = x + (l/X)t, ( the unit normal, all coincide, and M lies on the sphere of radius 1 /X centered at the unique focal point. This simple idea suggests a plan of attack for classifying hypersurfaces in terms of the nature of the principal curvatures. Under fairly general conditions, the set of focal points corresponding to a principal curvature X can be given a differentiable Received by the editors December 19, 1980. Presented to the Society at its annual meeting in San Francisco, January 10, 1981. 1980 Mathematics Subject Classificatiom Primary 53B25, 53C40.

296 citations


"Real Hypersurfaces of Complex Space..." refers background in this paper

  • ... persurfaces in Pn(C), The proof can be found in [ 2 ]....

    [...]

  • ...that there are no Einstein real hypersurfaces of Pn(C) [ 2 ]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that a complex submanifold with constant principal curvatures is an open subset of a homogeneous hypersurface if and only if it has constant curvatures and Jt is principal.
Abstract: Let M be a real hypersurface in /"'(C), J be the complex structure and | denote a unit normal vector field on M. We show that M is (an open subset of) a homogeneous hypersurface if and only if M has constant principal curvatures and Jt, is principal. We also obtain a characterization of certain complex submanifolds in a complex projective space. Specifically, /""(C) (totally geodesic), Q", Pl(C) x P"(C). SU{5)/S(U{2) X (7(3)) and SO(10)/t/(5) are the only complex submani- folds whose principal curvatures are constant in the sense that they depend neither on the point of the submanifold nor on the normal vector.

284 citations


"Real Hypersurfaces of Complex Space..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Proposition 2.9. ([ 3 ]) Let M be a real hypersurface of Pn(C)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the second fundamental tensor of a real hypersurface of a complex projective space (CPn) is compared with the corresponding hypersurfaces of a Riemannian manifold of constant curvature.
Abstract: A principal circle bundle over a real hypersurface of a complex projective space CPn can be regarded as a hypersurface of an odddimensional sphere. From this standpoint we can establish a method to translate conditions imposed on a hypersurface of CPn into those imposed on a hypersurface of S2'+1. Some fundamental relations between the second fundamental tensor of a hypersurface of CPn and that of a hypersurface of S2n+1 are given. Introduction. As is well known a sphere S2n+1 of dimension 2n + 1 is a principal circle bundle over a complex projective space CPn and the Riemannian structure on CPn is given by the submersion ir: S2n+ 1 ~ CPn [4], [7]. This suggests that fundamental properties of a submersion would be applied to the study of real submanifolds of a complex projective space. In fact, H. B. Lawson [2] has made one step in this direction. His idea is to construct a principal circle bundle M2n over a real hypersurface M2n-1 of Cpn in such a way that M2n is a hypersurface of S2n + 1 and then to compare the length of the second fundamental tensors of M2n-1 and M2 n. Thus we can apply theorems on hypersurfaces of S2n+1. In this paper, using Lawson's method, we prove a theorem which characterizes some remarkable classes of real hypersurfaces of Cpn. First of all, in ?1, we state a lemma for a hypersurface of a Riemannian manifold of constant curvature for the later use. In ?2, we recall fundamental formulas of a submersion which are obtained in [4], [7] and those established between the second fundamental tensors of M and M. In ?3, we give some identities which are valid in a real hypersurface of CPn. After these preparations, we show, in ?4, a geometric meaning of the commutativity of the second fundamental tensor of M in Cp'n and a fundamental tensor of the submersion ir: M . M 1. Hypersurfaces of a Riemannian manifold of constant curvature. Let M be an (m + 1)-dimensional Riemannian manifold with a Riemannian metric G and i: M M be an isometric immersion of an m-dimensional differentiable Received by the editors March 25, 1974 and, in revised form, September 9, 1974. AMS (MOS) subject classifications (1970). Primary 53C40, 53C20.

282 citations


"Real Hypersurfaces of Complex Space..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Proposition 2.3. ([ 6 ], [9]) Let M, where n ‚ 2, be a real hypersurface in Mn(c) of constant holomorphic sectional curvature 4c 6= 0. Then `A = A` if and only if M is an open subset of the following: (i) a geodesic hypersphere, (ii) a tube over totally geodesic complex space form Mk(c), where 0 < k • ni1....

    [...]

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this article, a complete classification of isoparametric hypersurfaces with constant principal curvatures has been obtained in the sphere, but the classification has not been obtained until now.
Abstract: Since E. Cartan's work in the late 30's the classification problem of hypersurfaces with constant principal curvatures is known to be far from trivial. In real space forms it leads to the well-known classification problem of isoparametric hypersurfaces, which has been solved in euclidean space by T. Levi-Civita [6] and B. Segre [11] and in hyperbolic space by E. Cartan [1]; in the sphere, however, a complete classification has not been obtained until now (for essential results see [1], [2], [3], [8], [9], [10], and the literature cited there).

253 citations


"Real Hypersurfaces of Complex Space..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Proposition 2.10. ([ 1 ]) Let M be a real hypersurface of Hn(C) of constant holomorphic sectional curvature 4c < 0. Then M has constant principal curvatures and » is a principal curvature vector if and only if M is locally congruent to the following:...

    [...]