Real-time difference imaging analysis of moa galactic bulge observations during 2000
Citations
623 citations
560 citations
527 citations
470 citations
396 citations
Cites methods from "Real-time difference imaging analys..."
...…Search (MPS, Rhie et al. 1999), and the Microlensing Follow-Up Network (µFUN, http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/∼microfun/) intensively monitor alerts from EWS and also from the Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics collaboration (MOA, Bond et al. 2001), primarily to search for planets....
[...]
References
1,437 citations
"Real-time difference imaging analys..." refers methods in this paper
...…= Fbase Nref ∑ i A(u(ti)) (9) The amplification, A(u), expressed in terms of the distance, u, of the lens star from the line-of-sight to the source star expressed in units of the Einstein radius is given by (Paczyński 1986) A(u) = u2 + 2 u √ u2 + 4 (10) where u(t) = √ u2min + ( t − tmax tE )2 ....
[...]
896 citations
"Real-time difference imaging analys..." refers methods in this paper
...The Dophot procedure was applied to the corresponding MOA reference images and the resulting star positions were cross-referenced with those of stars with UBVI measurements....
[...]
...The photometry measurements were based on profile fitting software such as Dophot (Schechter et al. 1993) which determines fluxes by integrating over the profile of a given star on a given image....
[...]
...The reference flux may be measured by applying a profile fitting program such as Dophot to the reference image....
[...]
657 citations
"Real-time difference imaging analys..." refers background in this paper
...The lower right image is the same subtracted image with the positions of saturated stars masked out. approach was adopted by Alcock et al. (1999a) in their reanalysis of a subset of the MACHO data....
[...]
...Recent re-analyses of the MACHO database using DIA have increased the microlensing detection rate and improved the quality of the photometry (Alcock et al. 1999a; 1999b; 2000)....
[...]
...The observational strategy employed by MOA for the Galactic Bulge in 2000 was somewhat different from that of the established survey groups MACHO, OGLE, and EROS....
[...]
...The approach adopted by the MACHO collaboration was to divide their images into small sub-rasters and solve for the convolution kernel separately on each of these sub-rasters assuming no significant variations in the kernel occurred on their length scales (Alcock et al. 1999a)....
[...]
...This is a large fraction of high magnification events when compared with the corresponding fractions from the MACHO and OGLE surveys....
[...]
585 citations
"Real-time difference imaging analys..." refers background in this paper
...The observational strategy employed by MOA for the Galactic Bulge in 2000 was somewhat different from that of the established survey groups MACHO, OGLE, and EROS....
[...]
...More than 500 microlensing events, most of them alerted in real time, have been identified by the microlensing survey groups MACHO (Alcock et al. 1993), OGLE (Udalski et al. 1992), and EROS (Aubourg et al. 1993)....
[...]
581 citations
"Real-time difference imaging analys..." refers background in this paper
...These formally correspond to confidence limits of 68%, 95%, and 99.73% respectively for the simultaneous estimation of two interesting parameters (Avni 1976)....
[...]