Reduction in Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Prevalence Among Young Women Following HPV Vaccine Introduction in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2003–2010
01 Aug 2013-The Journal of Infectious Diseases (Oxford University Press)-Vol. 208, Iss: 3, pp 385-393
TL;DR: Within 4 years of vaccine introduction, the vaccine-type HPV prevalence decreased among females aged 14-19 years despite low vaccine uptake, and the estimated vaccine effectiveness was high.
Abstract: Background. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was introduced into the routine immunization schedule in the United States in late 2006 for females aged 11 or 12 years with catch-up vaccination recommended for those aged 13-26 years. In 2010 3-dose vaccine coverage was only 32% among 13-17 year-olds. Reduction in the prevalence of HPV types targeted by the quadrivalent vaccine (HPV-6 -11 -16 and -18) will be one of the first measures of vaccine impact. Methods. We analyzed HPV prevalence data from the vaccine era (2007-2010) and the prevaccine era (2003-2006) that were collected during National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. HPV prevalence was determined by the Linear Array HPV Assay in cervicovaginal swab samples from females aged 14-59 years; 4150 provided samples in 2003-2006 and 4253 provided samples in 2007-2010. Results. Among females aged 14-19 years the vaccine-type HPV prevalence (HPV-6 -11 -16 or -18) decreased from 11.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.2-14.4) in 2003-2006 to 5.1% (95% CI 3.8-6.6) in 2007-2010 a decline of 56% (95% CI 38-69). Among other age groups the prevalence did not differ significantly between the 2 time periods (P > .05). The vaccine effectiveness of at least 1 dose was 82% (95% CI 53-93). Conclusions. Within 4 years of vaccine introduction the vaccine-type HPV prevalence decreased among females aged 14-19 years despite low vaccine uptake. The estimated vaccine effectiveness was high.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: These guidelines for the treatment of persons who have or are at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) were updated by CDC after consultation with a group of professionals knowledgeable in the field of STDs who met in Atlanta on April 30-May 2, 2013.
Abstract: These guidelines for the treatment of persons who have or are at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) were updated by CDC after consultation with a group of professionals knowledgeable in the field of STDs who met in Atlanta on April 30-May 2, 2013. The information in this report updates the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010 (MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59 [No. RR-12]). These updated guidelines discuss 1) alternative treatment regimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae; 2) the use of nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of trichomoniasis; 3) alternative treatment options for genital warts; 4) the role of Mycoplasma genitalium in urethritis/cervicitis and treatment-related implications; 5) updated HPV vaccine recommendations and counseling messages; 6) the management of persons who are transgender; 7) annual testing for hepatitis C in persons with HIV infection; 8) updated recommendations for diagnostic evaluation of urethritis; and 9) retesting to detect repeat infection. Physicians and other health-care providers can use these guidelines to assist in the prevention and treatment of STDs.
1,862 citations
Medical University of Vienna1, University of South Florida2, University of Bergen3, Laval University4, University of Washington5, University of Copenhagen6, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation7, University of Hong Kong8, Aarhus University9, Mahidol University10, University of British Columbia11, University of Hamburg12, Mackay Memorial Hospital13, Queen Mary University of London14, University of Melbourne15, University of Alabama16, Merck & Co.17
TL;DR: The 9vHPV vaccine prevented infection and disease related to HPV-31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 in a susceptible population and generated an antibody response to HPV -6, 11, 16, and 18 that was noninferior to that generated by the qHPV Vaccine.
Abstract: BackgroundThe investigational 9-valent viruslike particle vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) includes the HPV types in the quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccine (6, 11, 16, and 18) and five additional oncogenic types (31, 33, 45, 52, and 58). Here we present the results of a study of the efficacy and immunogenicity of the 9vHPV vaccine in women 16 to 26 years of age. MethodsWe performed a randomized, international, double-blind, phase 2b–3 study of the 9vHPV vaccine in 14,215 women. Participants received the 9vHPV vaccine or the qHPV vaccine in a series of three intramuscular injections on day 1 and at months 2 and 6. Serum was collected for analysis of antibody responses. Swabs of labial, vulvar, perineal, perianal, endocervical, and ectocervical tissue were obtained and used for HPV DNA testing, and liquid-based cytologic testing (Papanicolaou testing) was performed regularly. Tissue obtained by means of biopsy or as part of definitive therapy (including a loop electrosurgical excision procedure and c...
1,109 citations
TL;DR: China is undergoing the cancer transition stage where the cancer spectrum is changing from developing country to developed country, with a rapidly increase cancer burden of colorectal, prostate, female breast cancers in addition to a high occurrence of infection-related and digestive cancers.
Abstract: Cancer is the leading cause of death in China and depicting the cancer pattern of China would provide basic knowhows on how to tackle it more effectively. In this study we have reviewed several reports of cancer burden, including the Global cancer statistics 2018 and Cancer statistics in China, 2015, along with the GLOBCAN 2018 online database, to investigate the differences of cancer patterns between China, the United States (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK). An estimated 4.3 million new cancer cases and 2.9 million new cancer deaths occurred in China in 2018. Compared to the USA and UK, China has lower cancer incidence but a 30% and 40% higher cancer mortality than the UK and USA, among which 36.4% of the cancer-related deaths were from the digestive tract cancers (stomach, liver, and esophagus cancer) and have relatively poorer prognoses. In comparison, the digestive cancer deaths only took up ≤ 5% of the total cancer deaths in either USA or UK. Other reasons for the higher mortality in China may be the low rate of early-stage cancers at diagnosis and non-uniformed clinical cancer treatment strategies performed by different regions. China is undergoing the cancer transition stage where the cancer spectrum is changing from developing country to developed country, with a rapidly increase cancer burden of colorectal, prostate, female breast cancers in addition to a high occurrence of infection-related and digestive cancers. The incidence of westernized lifestyle-related cancers in China (i.e. colorectal cancer, prostate, bladder cancer) has risen but the incidence of the digestive cancers has decreased from 2000 to 2011. An estimated 40% of the risk factors can be attributed to environmental and lifestyle factors either in China or other developed countries. Tobacco smoking is the single most important carcinogenic risk factor in China, contributing to ~ 24.5% of cancers in males. Chronic infection is another important preventable cancer contributor which is responsible for ~ 17% of cancers. Comprehensive prevention and control strategies in China should include effective tobacco-control policy, recommendations for healthier lifestyles, along with enlarging the coverage of effective screening, educating, and vaccination programs to better sensitize greater awareness control to the general public.
1,085 citations
29 Aug 2014
TL;DR: This report summarizes the epidemiology of human papillomavirus (HPV) and associated diseases, describes the licensed HPV vaccines, provides updated data from clinical trials and postlicensure safety studies, and compiles recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of HPV vaccines.
Abstract: This report summarizes the epidemiology of human papillomavirus (HPV) and associated diseases, describes the licensed HPV vaccines, provides updated data from clinical trials and postlicensure safety studies, and compiles recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of HPV vaccines. Persistent infection with oncogenic HPV types can cause cervical cancer in women as well as other anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers in women and men. HPV also causes genital warts. Two HPV vaccines are licensed in the United States. Both are composed of type-specific HPV L1 protein, the major capsid protein of HPV. Expression of the L1 protein using recombinant DNA technology produces noninfectious virus-like particles (VLPs). Quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV4) contains four HPV type-specific VLPs prepared from the L1 proteins of HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18. Bivalent HPV vaccine (HPV2) contains two HPV type-specific VLPs prepared from the L1 proteins of HPV 16 and 18. Both vaccines are administered in a 3-dose series. ACIP recommends routine vaccination with HPV4 or HPV2 for females aged 11 or 12 years and with HPV4 for males aged 11 or 12 years. Vaccination also is recommended for females aged 13 through 26 years and for males aged 13 through 21 years who were not vaccinated previously. Males aged 22 through 26 years may be vaccinated. ACIP recommends vaccination of men who have sex with men and immunocompromised persons (including those with HIV infection) through age 26 years if not previously vaccinated. As a compendium of all current recommendations for use of HPV vaccines, information in this report is intended for use by clinicians, vaccination providers, public health officials, and immunization program personnel as a resource. ACIP recommendations are reviewed periodically and are revised as indicated when new information and data become available.
777 citations
TL;DR: Overall progress in vaccination coverage among adolescents, HPV vaccination coverage continues to lag behind Tdap and MenACWY coverage at state and national levels, but seven public health jurisdictions achieved significant increases in ≥1- or ≥3-dose HPV vaccination Coverage among females in 2014, demonstrating that substantial improvement in HPV vaccinations coverage is feasible.
Abstract: Routine immunization is recommended for adolescents aged 11-12 years by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for protection against diseases including pertussis, meningococcal disease, and human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers. To assess vaccination coverage among adolescents, CDC analyzed data collected regarding 20,827 adolescents through the 2014 National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen). From 2013 to 2014, coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years increased for all routinely recommended vaccines: from 84.7% to 87.6% for ≥1 tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine dose, from 76.6% to 79.3% for ≥1 meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) vaccine dose, from 56.7% to 60.0% and from 33.6% to 41.7% for ≥1 HPV vaccine dose among females and males, respectively.† Coverage differed by state and local area. Despite overall progress in vaccination coverage among adolescents, HPV vaccination coverage continues to lag behind Tdap and MenACWY coverage at state and national levels. Seven public health jurisdictions achieved significant increases in ≥1- or ≥3-dose HPV vaccination coverage among females in 2014, demonstrating that substantial improvement in HPV vaccination coverage is feasible.
755 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: In this paper, the carcinogenicity of the biological agents classifi ed as "carcinogenic to humans" (Group 1) and to identify additional tumour sites and mechanisms of carcinogenesis (tables 1 and 2).
Abstract: In February, 2009, 36 scientists from 16 countries met at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to reassess the carcinogenicity of the biological agents classifi ed as “carcinogenic to humans” (Group 1) and to identify additional tumour sites and mechanisms of carcinogenesis (tables 1 and 2). These assessments will be published as part B of Volume 100 of the IARC Monographs. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infect, res pectively, over 300 million and 170 million people worldwide, mainly in Asia and Africa. Chronic infection with these viruses is known to cause hepatocellular carcinoma. Suffi cient evidence is available to conclude that chronic infection with HCV can also cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma, especially B-cell lymphoma. In an inter vention study, patients with HCV infection and splenic lymphoma who were given the antiviral agent, interferon, showed regression of the lymphoma. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infects almost everyone and causes several types of cancer, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, one of the most common cancers in southeastern Asia, and Burkitt’s lymphoma in children in Africa. New evidence points to a role for EBV in 5–10% of gastric carcinomas worldwide. EBV-positive gastric carcinoma develops early in life and has distinct histopathology, therefore it might belong to a separate clinical entity. In this subset of gastric tumours, presence of the viral genome in a monoclonal form and expression of EBV-transforming proteins are strong evidence for the involvement of EBV. Data from 22 cohort studies and 80 case–control studies show an association between Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus (KSHV) and Kaposi’s sarcoma, with relative risks higher than 10. Most studies are of transplant recipients and people infected with HIV-1. In both patients who are and are not infected with HIV-1, risk of Kaposi’s sarcoma increases relative to increasing titre of antibodies directed against KSHV, which are markers of the viral load. Evidence is suffi cient to show that KSHV causes primary eff usion lymphoma, a rare subgroup of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Mechanistic data support an oncogenic role for KSHV in Kaposi’s sarcoma and in primary eff usion lymphoma—in individuals who are immunocompromised and in those apparently immunocompetent. KSHV is also associated with multicentric Castleman’s disease. Individuals who are infected with HIV-1 have a high risk of cancer. HIV-1 infection, mainly through immunosuppression, leads to increased replication of oncogenic viruses such as EBV and KSHV. Although antiretroviral therapy lowers the risk of many cancers associated with HIV-1, risks remain high. Cervical cancer is caused by types of human papillomavirus (HPV) that belong to a few phylogenetically related “high-risk” species (alpha-5, 6, 7, 9, 11) of the mucosotropic alpha genus. The types found most frequently in cervical cancer (HPV-16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, 58) and four types less constantly found (HPV-39, 51, 56, 59) were classifi ed in
2,349 citations
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil1, National Autonomous University of Mexico2, University of Valencia3, National Cheng Kung University4, University of Buenos Aires5, Universidad Nacional de Asunción6, Makerere University7, University of Chile8, American University of Beirut9, Hacettepe University10, Hospital General San Juan de Dios11, Lagos University Teaching Hospital12, University of Barcelona13, University of the Philippines14, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University15, Prince of Songkla University16, Peking Union Medical College17, Royal Women's Hospital18, Kanazawa University19, Charles University in Prague20, Harvard University21, VU University Amsterdam22, Kuwait University23, Columbia University Medical Center24, University of Crete25, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki26, Central University of Venezuela27, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria28, University of Antioquia29, Medical University of Lublin30, Western Galilee Hospital31
TL;DR: HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58 should be given priority when the cross-protective effects of current vaccines are assessed, and for formulation of recommendations for the use of second-generation polyvalent HPV vaccines, according to this largest assessment of HPV genotypes to date.
Abstract: Summary Background Knowledge about the distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in invasive cervical cancer is crucial to guide the introduction of prophylactic vaccines. We aimed to provide novel and comprehensive data about the worldwide genotype distribution in patients with invasive cervical cancer. Methods Paraffin-embedded samples of histologically confirmed cases of invasive cervical cancer were collected from 38 countries in Europe, North America, central South America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. Inclusion criteria were a pathological confirmation of a primary invasive cervical cancer of epithelial origin in the tissue sample selected for analysis of HPV DNA, and information about the year of diagnosis. HPV detection was done by use of PCR with SPF-10 broad-spectrum primers followed by DNA enzyme immunoassay and genotyping with a reverse hybridisation line probe assay. Sequence analysis was done to characterise HPV-positive samples with unknown HPV types. Data analyses included algorithms of multiple infections to estimate type-specific relative contributions. Findings 22 661 paraffin-embedded samples were obtained from 14 249 women. 10 575 cases of invasive cervical cancer were included in the study, and 8977 (85%) of these were positive for HPV DNA. The most common HPV types were 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58 with a combined worldwide relative contribution of 8196 of 8977 (91%, 95% CI 90–92). HPV types 16 and 18 were detected in 6357 of 8977 of cases (71%, 70–72) of invasive cervical cancer. HPV types 16, 18, and 45 were detected in 443 of 470 cases (94%, 92–96) of cervical adenocarcinomas. Unknown HPV types that were identified with sequence analysis were 26, 30, 61, 67, 69, 82, and 91 in 103 (1%) of 8977 cases of invasive cervical cancer. Women with invasive cervical cancers related to HPV types 16, 18, or 45 presented at a younger mean age than did those with other HPV types (50·0 years [49·6–50·4], 48·2 years [47·3–49·2], 46·8 years [46·6–48·1], and 55·5 years [54·9–56·1], respectively). Interpretation To our knowledge, this study is the largest assessment of HPV genotypes to date. HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58 should be given priority when the cross-protective effects of current vaccines are assessed, and for formulation of recommendations for the use of second-generation polyvalent HPV vaccines. Our results also suggest that type-specific high-risk HPV-DNA-based screening tests and protocols should focus on HPV types 16, 18, and 45. Funding Spanish grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Marato de TV3 Foundation, and unrestricted grants from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, and Merck.
2,145 citations
"Reduction in Human Papillomavirus (..." refers background in this paper
...The high-risk types HPV-16 and -18 are responsible for approximately 70% of cervical cancers [8]....
[...]
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research1, University of Copenhagen2, University of Helsinki3, National Institute for Health and Welfare4, International Agency for Research on Cancer5, Norwegian University of Science and Technology6, Cayetano Heredia University7, Medical University of Warsaw8, Lund University9, Karolinska Institutet10, Boston Children's Hospital11, Emory University12, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis13, Georgia Regents University14, University of Washington15, Johns Hopkins University16, Duke University17, Merck & Co.18
TL;DR: In young women who had not been previously infected with HPV-16 or HPV-18, those in the vaccine group had a significantly lower occurrence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia related to HPV- 16 or HPV -18 than did those inThe placebo group.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus types 16 (HPV-16) and 18 (HPV-18) cause approximately 70% of cervical cancers worldwide. A phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate a quadrivalent vaccine against HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18 (HPV-6/11/16/18) for the prevention of high-grade cervical lesions associated with HPV-16 and HPV-18. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 12,167 women between the ages of 15 and 26 years to receive three doses of either HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine or placebo, administered at day 1, month 2, and month 6. The primary analysis was performed for a per-protocol susceptible population that included 5305 women in the vaccine group and 5260 in the placebo group who had no virologic evidence of infection with HPV-16 or HPV-18 through 1 month after the third dose (month 7). The primary composite end point was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, or cervical cancer related to HPV-16 or HPV-18. RESULTS: Subjects were followed for an average of 3 years after receiving the first dose of vaccine or placebo. Vaccine efficacy for the prevention of the primary composite end point was 98% (95.89% confidence interval [CI], 86 to 100) in the per-protocol susceptible population and 44% (95% CI, 26 to 58) in an intention-to-treat population of all women who had undergone randomization (those with or without previous infection). The estimated vaccine efficacy against all high-grade cervical lesions, regardless of causal HPV type, in this intention-to-treat population was 17% (95% CI, 1 to 31). CONCLUSIONS: In young women who had not been previously infected with HPV-16 or HPV-18, those in the vaccine group had a significantly lower occurrence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia related to HPV-16 or HPV-18 than did those in the placebo group.
1,904 citations
University of Helsinki1, Mexican Social Security Institute2, University of New Mexico3, National Taiwan University4, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust5, State University of Campinas6, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research7, Chulalongkorn University8, University of the Philippines9, Royal Women's Hospital10, Queen Mary University of London11, University of Alberta12, University of Manitoba13, University of Würzburg14, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven15, Hull York Medical School16, GlaxoSmithKline17, University of Tampere18
TL;DR: The HPV- 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine showed high efficacy against CIN2+ associated with HPV-16/18 and non-vaccine oncogenic HPV types and substantial overall effect in cohorts that are relevant to universal mass vaccination and catch-up programmes.
1,569 citations