Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project
Citations
2,164 citations
2,106 citations
Cites background or methods from "Reexamining the word length effect ..."
...The linear length effect of the number of letters in reality is a compound of word length itself (New et al., 2006, Figure 2) and the number of words resembling the stimulus word (as measured by N, the number of orthographic neighbors)....
[...]
...As the Elexicon includes all types of words, we made a selection similar to the one used by New et al. (2006)....
[...]
873 citations
Cites background from "Reexamining the word length effect ..."
...Additional syllables induce a processing cost as well (Ferrand et al., 2011; Fitzsimmons & Drieghe, 2011; New et al., 2006)....
[...]
521 citations
477 citations
References
3,472 citations
"Reexamining the word length effect ..." refers background in this paper
...…has no effect on word recognition (e.g., because letters are processed in parallel; see Grainger & Jacobs, 1996) or that the effect is inhibitory (e.g., because the nonlexical route for low-frequency words processes letter strings sequentially in a left-to-right cycle; see Coltheart et al., 2001)....
[...]
1,717 citations
"Reexamining the word length effect ..." refers methods in this paper
...As for frequency, we took log HAL frequencies (Lund & Burgess, 1996) provided in the ELP....
[...]
1,062 citations
"Reexamining the word length effect ..." refers background in this paper
...…of visual word recognition has been that word length either has no effect on word recognition (e.g., because letters are processed in parallel; see Grainger & Jacobs, 1996) or that the effect is inhibitory (e.g., because the nonlexical route for low-frequency words processes letter strings…...
[...]
804 citations
"Reexamining the word length effect ..." refers background in this paper
...As indicated in the introduction, Balota et al. (2004) reported in an experiment with single syllable words ranging from 2 to 8 letters a facilitatory length effect for high frequency words (which probably had a reduced length range) in university students....
[...]
...Another important result of Balota et al. (2004) is that their length effect was obtained after partialling out the length in phonemes, suggesting that the letter length effect is not a phoneme length effect in disguise....
[...]
447 citations
"Reexamining the word length effect ..." refers background or methods or result in this paper
...Recently, Juhasz and Rayner (2003) found word length to be a significant predictor of gaze duration and total fixation duration, confirming Rayner et al....
[...]
...Recently, Juhasz and Rayner (2003) found word length to be a significant predictor of gaze duration and total fixation duration, confirming Rayner et al.’s finding. Testing naming performance on 2,820 single-syllable words, Spieler and Balota (1997) found a surprisingly large inhibitory influence of length in letters (4.5% unique variance, 6.3% for log frequency, and 2.2% for orthographic neighborhood size). In a cross-language study, comparing German and English cognates, Ziegler, Perry, Jacobs, and Braun (2001) found an inhibitory letter length effect in both languages (in a naming task with items from 3 to 6 letters), although the effect was stronger in German than in English. Furthermore, these effects were still significant when the number of orthographic neighbors was partialled out. Perry and Ziegler (2002) were able to simulate these results with both a German version and the English version of the DRC model....
[...]
...Recently, Juhasz and Rayner (2003) found word length to be a significant predictor of gaze duration and total fixation duration, confirming Rayner et al.’s finding. Testing naming performance on 2,820 single-syllable words, Spieler and Balota (1997) found a surprisingly large inhibitory influence of length in letters (4.5% unique variance, 6.3% for log frequency, and 2.2% for orthographic neighborhood size). In a cross-language study, comparing German and English cognates, Ziegler, Perry, Jacobs, and Braun (2001) found an inhibitory letter length effect in both languages (in a naming task with items from 3 to 6 letters), although the effect was stronger in German than in English. Furthermore, these effects were still significant when the number of orthographic neighbors was partialled out. Perry and Ziegler (2002) were able to simulate these results with both a German version and the English version of the DRC model. In a more recent study, testing 2,906 monosyllabic words with 30 young and 30 old participants, Balota, Cortese, Sergent-Marshall, Spieler, and Yap (2004) found a reliable inhibitory length effect in naming (for 2- to 8-letter words) and a reliable but smaller inhibitory effect for lexical decision in older participants but not in university students....
[...]
...Recently, Juhasz and Rayner (2003) found word length to be a significant predictor of gaze duration and total fixation duration, confirming Rayner et al.’s finding. Testing naming performance on 2,820 single-syllable words, Spieler and Balota (1997) found a surprisingly large inhibitory influence of length in letters (4.5% unique variance, 6.3% for log frequency, and 2.2% for orthographic neighborhood size). In a cross-language study, comparing German and English cognates, Ziegler, Perry, Jacobs, and Braun (2001) found an inhibitory letter length effect in both languages (in a naming task with items from 3 to 6 letters), although the effect was stronger in German than in English....
[...]
...Recently, Juhasz and Rayner (2003) found word length to be a significant predictor of gaze duration and total fixation duration, confirming Rayner et al.’s finding. Testing naming performance on 2,820 single-syllable words, Spieler and Balota (1997) found a surprisingly large inhibitory influence of length in letters (4....
[...]