Book•
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
01 Jan 1988-
TL;DR: This book provides a clear and simple account of the key ideas and algorithms of reinforcement learning, which ranges from the history of the field's intellectual foundations to the most recent developments and applications.
Abstract: Reinforcement learning, one of the most active research areas in artificial intelligence, is a computational approach to learning whereby an agent tries to maximize the total amount of reward it receives when interacting with a complex, uncertain environment. In Reinforcement Learning, Richard Sutton and Andrew Barto provide a clear and simple account of the key ideas and algorithms of reinforcement learning. Their discussion ranges from the history of the field's intellectual foundations to the most recent developments and applications. The only necessary mathematical background is familiarity with elementary concepts of probability. The book is divided into three parts. Part I defines the reinforcement learning problem in terms of Markov decision processes. Part II provides basic solution methods: dynamic programming, Monte Carlo methods, and temporal-difference learning. Part III presents a unified view of the solution methods and incorporates artificial neural networks, eligibility traces, and planning; the two final chapters present case studies and consider the future of reinforcement learning.
Citations
More filters
Book•
[...]
TL;DR: Deep learning as mentioned in this paper is a form of machine learning that enables computers to learn from experience and understand the world in terms of a hierarchy of concepts, and it is used in many applications such as natural language processing, speech recognition, computer vision, online recommendation systems, bioinformatics, and videogames.
Abstract: Deep learning is a form of machine learning that enables computers to learn from experience and understand the world in terms of a hierarchy of concepts. Because the computer gathers knowledge from experience, there is no need for a human computer operator to formally specify all the knowledge that the computer needs. The hierarchy of concepts allows the computer to learn complicated concepts by building them out of simpler ones; a graph of these hierarchies would be many layers deep. This book introduces a broad range of topics in deep learning. The text offers mathematical and conceptual background, covering relevant concepts in linear algebra, probability theory and information theory, numerical computation, and machine learning. It describes deep learning techniques used by practitioners in industry, including deep feedforward networks, regularization, optimization algorithms, convolutional networks, sequence modeling, and practical methodology; and it surveys such applications as natural language processing, speech recognition, computer vision, online recommendation systems, bioinformatics, and videogames. Finally, the book offers research perspectives, covering such theoretical topics as linear factor models, autoencoders, representation learning, structured probabilistic models, Monte Carlo methods, the partition function, approximate inference, and deep generative models. Deep Learning can be used by undergraduate or graduate students planning careers in either industry or research, and by software engineers who want to begin using deep learning in their products or platforms. A website offers supplementary material for both readers and instructors.
38,208 citations
TL;DR: This work bridges the divide between high-dimensional sensory inputs and actions, resulting in the first artificial agent that is capable of learning to excel at a diverse array of challenging tasks.
Abstract: The theory of reinforcement learning provides a normative account, deeply rooted in psychological and neuroscientific perspectives on animal behaviour, of how agents may optimize their control of an environment. To use reinforcement learning successfully in situations approaching real-world complexity, however, agents are confronted with a difficult task: they must derive efficient representations of the environment from high-dimensional sensory inputs, and use these to generalize past experience to new situations. Remarkably, humans and other animals seem to solve this problem through a harmonious combination of reinforcement learning and hierarchical sensory processing systems, the former evidenced by a wealth of neural data revealing notable parallels between the phasic signals emitted by dopaminergic neurons and temporal difference reinforcement learning algorithms. While reinforcement learning agents have achieved some successes in a variety of domains, their applicability has previously been limited to domains in which useful features can be handcrafted, or to domains with fully observed, low-dimensional state spaces. Here we use recent advances in training deep neural networks to develop a novel artificial agent, termed a deep Q-network, that can learn successful policies directly from high-dimensional sensory inputs using end-to-end reinforcement learning. We tested this agent on the challenging domain of classic Atari 2600 games. We demonstrate that the deep Q-network agent, receiving only the pixels and the game score as inputs, was able to surpass the performance of all previous algorithms and achieve a level comparable to that of a professional human games tester across a set of 49 games, using the same algorithm, network architecture and hyperparameters. This work bridges the divide between high-dimensional sensory inputs and actions, resulting in the first artificial agent that is capable of learning to excel at a diverse array of challenging tasks.
23,074 citations
TL;DR: This historical survey compactly summarizes relevant work, much of it from the previous millennium, review deep supervised learning, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning & evolutionary computation, and indirect search for short programs encoding deep and large networks.
14,635 citations
Cites background from "Reinforcement Learning: An Introduc..."
...Such NNs learn to perceive/encode/predict/ classify patterns or pattern sequences, but they do not learn to act in the more general sense of Reinforcement Learning (RL) in unknown environments (see surveys, e.g., Kaelbling et al., 1996; Sutton & Barto, 1998; Wiering & van Otterlo, 2012)....
[...]
...The latter is often explained in a probabilistic framework (e.g., Sutton & Barto, 1998), but its basic idea can already be conveyed in a deterministic setting....
[...]
...Such NNs learn to perceive / encode / predict / classify patterns or pattern sequences, but they do not learn to act in the more general sense of Reinforcement Learning (RL) in unknown environments (e.g., Kaelbling et al., 1996; Sutton and Barto, 1998)....
[...]
...Many variants of traditional RL exist (e.g., Barto et al., 1983; Watkins, 1989; Watkins and Dayan, 1992; Moore and Atkeson, 1993; Schwartz, 1993; Baird, 1994; Rummery and Niranjan, 1994; Singh, 1994; Baird, 1995; Kaelbling et al., 1995; Peng and Williams, 1996; Mahadevan, 1996; Tsitsiklis and van Roy, 1996; Bradtke et al., 1996; Santamarı́a et al., 1997; Prokhorov and Wunsch, 1997; Sutton and Barto, 1998; Wiering and Schmidhuber, 1998b; Baird and Moore, 1999; Meuleau et al., 1999; Morimoto and Doya, 2000; Bertsekas, 2001; Brafman and Tennenholtz, 2002; Abounadi et al., 2002; Lagoudakis and Parr, 2003; Sutton et al., 2008; Maei and Sutton, 2010)....
[...]
...This assumption does not hold in the broader fields of Sequential Decision Making and Reinforcement Learning (RL) (Kaelbling et al., 1996; Sutton and Barto, 1998; Hutter, 2005) (Sec....
[...]
TL;DR: Using this search algorithm, the program AlphaGo achieved a 99.8% winning rate against other Go programs, and defeated the human European Go champion by 5 games to 0.5, the first time that a computer program has defeated a human professional player in the full-sized game of Go.
Abstract: The game of Go has long been viewed as the most challenging of classic games for artificial intelligence owing to its enormous search space and the difficulty of evaluating board positions and moves. Here we introduce a new approach to computer Go that uses ‘value networks’ to evaluate board positions and ‘policy networks’ to select moves. These deep neural networks are trained by a novel combination of supervised learning from human expert games, and reinforcement learning from games of self-play. Without any lookahead search, the neural networks play Go at the level of stateof-the-art Monte Carlo tree search programs that simulate thousands of random games of self-play. We also introduce a new search algorithm that combines Monte Carlo simulation with value and policy networks. Using this search algorithm, our program AlphaGo achieved a 99.8% winning rate against other Go programs, and defeated the human European Go champion by 5 games to 0. This is the first time that a computer program has defeated a human professional player in the full-sized game of Go, a feat previously thought to be at least a decade away.
14,377 citations
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
Abstract: Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.
10,141 citations
References
More filters
01 Jul 1974
TL;DR: Attention has been focused on the norms of behavior of learning automata, issues in the design of updating schemes, convergence of the action probabilities, and interaction of several automata.
Abstract: Stochastic automata operating in an unknown random environment have been proposed earlier as models of learning. These automata update their action probabilities in accordance with the inputs received from the environment and can improve their own performance during operation. In this context they are referred to as learning automata. A survey of the available results in the area of learning automata has been attempted in this paper. Attention has been focused on the norms of behavior of learning automata, issues in the design of updating schemes, convergence of the action probabilities, and interaction of several automata. Utilization of learning automata in parameter optimization and hypothesis testing is discussed, and potential areas of application are suggested.
688 citations
"Reinforcement Learning: An Introduc..." refers background in this paper
...Discover how to implement Q-learning on ‘grid world’ environments, teach your agent to buy and trade stocks, and find out how natural language models are driving the boom in chatbots....
[...]
...What you will learn Master the key skills of deep learning, Page 10/11 reinforcement learning, and deep reinforcement learning Understand Q-learning and deep Q-learning Learn from friendly, plain English explanations and practical activities Build fun projects, including a virtual-self-driving car Use AI to solve real-world business problems and win classic video games Build an intelligent, virtual robot warehouse worker Who this book is for If you want to add AI to your skillset, this book is for you....
[...]
...5 Q-learning was introduced by Watkins (1989), whose outline of a convergence proof was made rigorous by Watkins and Dayan (1992)....
[...]
Proceedings Article•
30 Nov 1992TL;DR: This paper shows how to create a Q-learning managerial hierarchy in which high level managers learning how to set tasks to their submanagers who, in turn, learn how to satisfy them.
Abstract: One way to speed up reinforcement learning is to enable learning to happen simultaneously at multiple resolutions in space and time. This paper shows how to create a Q-learning managerial hierarchy in which high level managers learn how to set tasks to their submanagers who, in turn, learn how to satisfy them. Submanagers need not initially understand their managers' commands. They simply learn to maximise their reinforcement in the context of the current command.
We illustrate the system using a simple maze task. As the system learns how to get around, satisfying commands at the multiple levels, it explores more efficiently than standard, flat, Q-learning and builds a more comprehensive map.
681 citations
TL;DR: Dyna as mentioned in this paper is an AI architecture that integrates learning, planning, and reactive execution, where learning methods are used both for compiling planning results and for updating a model of the effects of the agent's actions on the world.
Abstract: Dyna is an AI architecture that integrates learning, planning, and reactive execution. Learning methods are used in Dyna both for compiling planning results and for updating a model of the effects of the agent's actions on the world. Planning is incremental and can use the probabilistic and ofttimes incorrect world models generated by learning processes. Execution is fully reactive in the sense that no planning intervenes between perception and action. Dyna relies on machine learning methods for learning from examples---these are among the basic building blocks making up the architecture---yet is not tied to any particular method. This paper briefly introduces Dyna and discusses its strengths and weaknesses with respect to other architectures.
681 citations
Proceedings Article•
29 Jun 2000TL;DR: This paper considers the off-policy version of the policy evaluation problem, for which only one eligibility trace algorithm is known, a Monte Carlo method, and analyzes and compares this and four new eligibility trace algorithms, emphasizing their relationships to the classical statistical technique known as importance sampling.
Abstract: Eligibility traces have been shown to speed reinforcement learning, to make it more robust to hidden states, and to provide a link between Monte Carlo and temporal-difference methods. Here we generalize eligibility traces to off-policy learning, in which one learns about a policy different from the policy that generates the data. Off-policy methods can greatly multiply learning, as many policies can be learned about from the same data stream, and have been identified as particularly useful for learning about subgoals and temporally extended macro-actions. In this paper we consider the off-policy version of the policy evaluation problem, for which only one eligibility trace algorithm is known, a Monte Carlo method. We analyze and compare this and four new eligibility trace algorithms, emphasizing their relationships to the classical statistical technique known as importance sampling. Our main results are 1) to establish the consistency and bias properties of the new methods and 2) to empirically rank the new methods, showing improvement over one-step and Monte Carlo methods. Our results are restricted to model-free, table-lookup methods and to offline updating (at the end of each episode) although several of the algorithms could be applied more generally.
679 citations
Book•
20 May 1993TL;DR: This dissertation addresses the problem of designing algorithms for learning in embedded systems using Sutton's techniques for linear association and reinforcement comparison, while the interval estimation algorithm uses the statistical notion of confidence intervals to guide its generation of actions.
Abstract: This dissertation addresses the problem of designing algorithms for learning in embedded systems. This problem differs from the traditional supervised learning problem. An agent, finding itself in a particular input situation must generate an action. It then receives a reinforcement value from the environment, indicating how valuable the current state of the environment is for the agent. The agent cannot, however, deduce the reinforcement value that would have resulted from executing any of its other actions. A number of algorithms for learning action strategies from reinforcement values are presented and compared empirically with existing reinforcement-learning algorithms.
The interval-estimation algorithm uses the statistical notion of confidence intervals to guide its generation of actions in the world, trading off acting to gain information against acting to gain reinforcement. It performs well in simple domains but does not exhibit any generalization and is computationally complex.
The cascade algorithm is a structural credit-assignment method that allows an action strategy with many output bits to be learned by a collection of reinforcement-learning modules that learn Boolean functions. This method represents an improvement in computational complexity and often in learning rate.
Two algorithms for learning Boolean functions in k-DNF are described. Both are based on Valiant's algorithm for learning such functions from input-output instances. The first uses Sutton's techniques for linear association and reinforcement comparison, while the second uses techniques from the interval estimation algorithm. They both perform well and have tractable complexity.
A generate-and-test reinforcement-learning algorithm is presented. It allows symbolic representations of Boolean functions to be constructed incrementally and tested in the environment. It is highly parametrized and can be tuned to learn a broad range of function classes. Low-complexity functions can be learned very efficiently even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant input bits. This algorithm is extended to construct simple sequential networks using a set-reset operator, which allows the agent to learn action strategies with state.
These algorithms, in addition to being studied in simulation, were implemented and tested on a physical mobile robot.
677 citations
"Reinforcement Learning: An Introduc..." refers background in this paper
...The soap bubble example is a classical Dirichlet problem whose Monte Carlo solution was first proposed by Kakutani (1945). (see Hersh and Griego, 1969; Doyle and Snell, 1984)....
[...]