scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The findings reveal that successful students and groups differ in terms of their feedback quality than less-successfulStudents and groups, which implies that when students engage in high-quality, elaborated and justified peer feedback processes, they write high- quality argumentative essays.
Abstract
Teachers often complain about the quality of students' written essays in higher education. This study explores the relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay as they occur in an authentic learning situation with direct practical relevance. Furthermore, the effects of the online argumentative peer feedback script on students' written argumentative essay are studied. A pre-test, post-test design was used with 189 undergraduate students who were assigned to groups of three. They were asked to explore various perspectives, and the ‘pros and cons’ on the topic of ‘Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)’ in order to write an argumentative essay in the field of biotechnology. The findings reveal that successful students and groups differ in terms of their feedback quality than less-successful students and groups. This implies that when students engage in high-quality, elaborated and justified peer feedback processes, they write high-quality argumentative essays. Furthermore, the results show that the online argumentative peer feedback script enhances the quality of students' written argumentative essay. Explanations for these results, limitations, and recommendations for further research are provided.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: a systematic review

TL;DR: In this paper, gamification has been argued to be a fun and enjoyable method to support Learning English as a Second Language (LESL) and to ease the gap between students' learning and educational practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students' academic writing: a Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: In this paper, a quantitative synthesis for the impact that peer feedback has on students' writing is presented, however, a quantitative evaluation of the impact of peer feedback on academic writing tasks in higher education is still lacking.
Journal ArticleDOI

Promoting Argumentation Competence: Extending from First- to Second-Order Scaffolding Through Adaptive Fading

TL;DR: This paper presents a guideline for second-order argument scaffolding using diagnosis of the student’s internal argumentative script and offering adaptive external support and various fading mechanisms to ensure that learners actually understand, learn, and apply targeted argumentation activities in similar situations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fostering oral presentation competence through a virtual reality-based task for delivering feedback

TL;DR: The effectiveness of a virtual reality-based task in which first-year undergraduate students practiced their presentation in a virtual environment and received feedback produced by the system was examined, revealing significant improvements from pre-test to post-test in all three presentation competence components.
Journal ArticleDOI

How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning

TL;DR: This paper investigated the effects of unscripted, scripted and guided online peer feedback on students' argumentative essay writing, argumentative feedback quality and domain-specific knowledge acçusation.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Power of Feedback

TL;DR: This paper provided a conceptual analysis of feedback and reviewed the evidence related to its impact on learning and achievement, and suggested ways in which feedback can be used to enhance its effectiveness in classrooms.
Book

The uses of argument

TL;DR: In this paper, the origins of epistemological theory are discussed and the layout of argument and modal arguments are discussed, as well as the history of working logic and idealised logic.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.

TL;DR: In this article, KlUGER and Denisi analyzed all the major reasons to reject a paper from the meta-analysis, even though the decision to exclude a paper came at the first identification of a missing inclusion criterion.
Journal ArticleDOI

Focus on Formative Feedback

TL;DR: This article reviewed the corpus of research on feedback, with a focus on formative feedback, defined as information communicated to the learner that is intended to modify his or her thinking or behavior to improve learning.
Related Papers (5)