scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches

01 Feb 2011-Manual Therapy (Elsevier)-Vol. 16, Iss: 1, pp 103
About: This article is published in Manual Therapy.The article was published on 2011-02-01. It has received 16374 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Research design.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
James Scotland1
TL;DR: In this article, the philosophical underpinnings of three major educational research paradigms: scientific, interpretive, and critical are explored, and the interrelationships between each paradigm's ontology, epistemology, methodology and methods are discussed.
Abstract: This paper explores the philosophical underpinnings of three major educational research paradigms: scientific, interpretive, and critical. The aim was to outline and explore the interrelationships between each paradigm’s ontology, epistemology, methodology and methods. This paper reveals and then discusses some of the underlying assumptions of educational research. Consequently, this paper is relevant to every English language teacher who is a reader of research.

990 citations


Cites background or methods from "Research Design: Qualitative, Quant..."

  • ...Interpretive methodology is directed at understanding phenomenon from an individual’s perspective, investigating interaction among individuals as well as the historical and cultural contexts which people inhabit (Creswell, 2009, p. 8)....

    [...]

  • ...Individual constructs are elicited and understood through interaction between researchers and participants (Guba & Lincon, 1994, p. 111) with participants being relied on as much as possible (Creswell, 2009, p. 8)....

    [...]

  • ...Positivists attempt to identify causes which influence outcomes (Creswell, 2009, p. 7)....

    [...]

  • ...Furthermore, as knowledge is tentative, hypotheses are not proved but simply not rejected (Creswell, 2009, p. 7)....

    [...]

  • ...Consequently, participants are involved in the research process, for example designing questions, collecting data, analyzing information and benefiting from research (Creswell, 2009, p. 9)....

    [...]

Posted Content
TL;DR: The logical choices available in research methodologies; which enable the drawing of correct inferences to answer the various research questions that are asked by accounting researchers are introduced.
Abstract: The present paper introduces the logical choices available in research methodologies; which enable the drawing of correct inferences to answer the various research questions that are asked by accounting researchers.It starts with an overview of research paradigms as fundamental beliefs that affect the ways to conduct social research, including the choice of a particular research methodology. The paper then details the elements of case study design, including the justification to choose case organizations. The sections that follow present an overview of the required data and collection methods and discuss the methods used to analyze the collected data. Considerations regarding research quality are also presented. This paper is a useful reference or a starting point for researchers considering qualitative multi-method case study research designs.

809 citations


Cites background or methods from "Research Design: Qualitative, Quant..."

  • ...Positivists believe that different researchers observing the same factual problem will generate a similar result by carefully using statistical tests and applying a similar research process in investigating a large sample (Creswell 2009)....

    [...]

  • ...Some writers (e.g. Berry and Otley 2004; Creswell 2009; Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill 2009; Neuman 2011) emphasise that it is important to initially question the research paradigm to be applied in conducting research because it substantially influences how one undertake a social study from the way of framing and understanding social phenomena....

    [...]

  • ...Some writers (e.g. Berry and Otley 2004; Creswell 2009; Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill 2009; Neuman 2011) emphasise that it is important to initially question the research paradigm to be applied in conducting research because it substantially influences how one undertake a social study from the way…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the historical background of phenomenology as both a theory and a qualitative research approach, an approach that has transitioned into an interpretative analytical tradition, and provide a step-by-step comprehensive guide to help novice qualitative researchers.
Abstract: As a research methodology, qualitative research method infuses an added advantage to the exploratory capability that researchers need to explore and investigate their research studies. Qualitative methodology allows researchers to advance and apply their interpersonal and subjectivity skills to their research exploratory processes. However, in a study with an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach, the advantageous elements of the study quadruple because of the bonding relationship that the approach allows for the researchers to develop with their research participants. Furthermore, as a qualitative research approach, IPA gives researchers the best opportunity to understand the innermost deliberation of the ‘lived experiences’ of research participants. As an approach that is ‘participant-oriented’, interpretative phenomenological analysis approach allows the interviewees (research participants) to express themselves and their ‘lived experience’ stories the way they see fit without any distortion and/or prosecution. Therefore, utilizing the IPA approach in a qualitative research study reiterates the fact that its main objective and essence are to explore the ‘lived experiences’ of the research participants and allow them to narrate the research findings through their ‘lived experiences’. As such, this paper discusses the historical background of phenomenology as both a theory and a qualitative research approach, an approach that has transitioned into an interpretative analytical tradition. Furthermore, as a resource tool to novice qualitative researchers, this paper provides a step-by-step comprehensive guide to help prepare and equip researchers with ways to utilize and apply the IPA approach in their qualitative research studies. More importantly, this paper also provides an advanced in-depth analysis and usability application for the IPA approach in a qualitatively conducted research study. As such, this paper completely contrasted itself from many books and articles that are written with the premise of providing useful and in-depth information on the subject-matter (phenomenology, as a qualitative approach).

456 citations


Cites background or methods from "Research Design: Qualitative, Quant..."

  • ...Creswell (2003) advised researchers to “Use open-ended questions without reference to the literature or theory unless otherwise indicated by a qualitative strategy of inquiry” (p. 107)....

    [...]

  • ...This ‘meaning unit’ help transform and transfer the ‘lived experiences’ of the research participants into a sensitive psychological expressions, so that these experiences (‘essences’) can be written in a more reflective and descriptive manner (cited in Creswell, 2013). Another phenomenology theorist and author is Riemen (1986). This author has written mostly in the medical field, especially in the area of caring, nursing....

    [...]

  • ...This ‘meaning unit’ help transform and transfer the ‘lived experiences’ of the research participants into a sensitive psychological expressions, so that these experiences (‘essences’) can be written in a more reflective and descriptive manner (cited in Creswell, 2013). Another phenomenology theorist and author is Riemen (1986). This author has written mostly in the medical field, especially in the area of caring, nursing. However, in order to develop a method of analysis for phenomenology, according to Creswell (2013, p. 194), Riemen formulated the ‘meaning statements’ from the significant statements in her “study of caring by patients and their nurses, she presents significant statements of caring and non-caring interactions for both males and females.” Additionally, as a way for phenomenology to have uniformity in the ‘lived experiences’ of research participants, Polkinghorne (1989), another phenomenologist, advised that phenomenological researchers should interview between 5 to 10 participants who have all experienced similar events (phenomenon). As such, the commonality of their experiences can be captured and interpreted. Finally, the history of phenomenology as a qualitative approach will not be complete without mentioning the names of Smith, Flowers, and Larkin (2009). These theorists and authors have individually, and collectively, revolutionized the theory and concept of phenomenology in today’s practice....

    [...]

  • ...This ‘meaning unit’ help transform and transfer the ‘lived experiences’ of the research participants into a sensitive psychological expressions, so that these experiences (‘essences’) can be written in a more reflective and descriptive manner (cited in Creswell, 2013). Another phenomenology theorist and author is Riemen (1986). This author has written mostly in the medical field, especially in the area of caring, nursing. However, in order to develop a method of analysis for phenomenology, according to Creswell (2013, p. 194), Riemen formulated the ‘meaning statements’ from the significant statements in her “study of caring by patients and their nurses, she presents significant statements of caring and non-caring interactions for both males and females.” Additionally, as a way for phenomenology to have uniformity in the ‘lived experiences’ of research participants, Polkinghorne (1989), another phenomenologist, advised that phenomenological researchers should interview between 5 to 10 participants who have all experienced similar events (phenomenon)....

    [...]

  • ...Creswell (2012, p. 76) stated that “a phenomenological study describes the common meaning for several individuals of their lived experiences of a concept or phenomenon.” He also stated that “Phenomenologists focus on describing what all participants have in common as they experience a phenomenon” (p. 76). The most important aspect of IPA tradition is its ability to make sense of the ‘lived experiences’ of the research participants and truly allow the research study to explore the phenomenon that the research is investigating. In today’s research world, IPA approach is used in many qualitative research studies to investigate and interpret the ‘lived experiences’ of people who have experienced similar (common) phenomenon. According to Creswell (2013), “phenomenological study describes the common meaning for several individuals of their lived experiences of a concept or a phenomenon” (p. 76). He also asserted that “Phenomenology is not only a description, but it is also an interpretive process in which the researcher makes an interpretation of the meaning of the lived experiences.” Furthermore, Smith et al. (2009) reiterated that IPA is concerned with the detailed examination of human lived experience. And it aims to conduct this examination in a way which as far as possible enables that experience to be expressed in its own terms, rather than according to predefined category systems. This is what makes IPA phenomenological and connect it to the core ideas unifying the phenomenological philosophers.... (p. 32) 4. Contrasting different approaches In a qualitative research methodology, there are varieties of data analytical approaches that researchers can utilize for their data analysis. Some of these analytical approaches are Narrative approach, Grounded Theory approach, Ethnographic approach, Case Study approach, the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach, etc. Arguments can be made for the justification of any one of these approaches (and in some cases, arguments are made). However, most of these data analysis approaches are aligned with the tradition that goes with their research designs. Therefore, for a case study research, it is appropriate for the researcher to utilize the case study data analysis approach, because it aligns well with the phenomenon that the study is investigating; the same holds true with the other data analysis approaches. Creswell (2013) said the following about the five data analysis approaches: Across all five approaches, the researcher typically begins by creating and organizing files of information....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the evolution of case study research, discuss methodological variations, and summarize key elements with the aim of providing guidance on the available options for researchers wanting to use case study in their work.
Abstract: Over the last forty years, case study research has undergone substantial methodological development. This evolution has resulted in a pragmatic, flexible research approach, capable of providing comprehensive in-depth understanding of a diverse range of issues across a number of disciplines. Change and progress have stemmed from parallel influences of historical transformations in approaches to research and individual researcher's preferences, perspectives, and interpretations of this design. Researchers who have contributed to the development of case study research come from diverse disciplines with different philosophical perspectives, resulting in a variety of definitions and approaches. For the researcher new to using case study, such variety can create a confusing platform for its application. In this article, we explore the evolution of case study research, discuss methodological variations, and summarize key elements with the aim of providing guidance on the available options for researchers wanting to use case study in their work. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1701195

451 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2017
TL;DR: The Task Force on Resources for the Publication of Qualitative Research of the Society for Qualitative Inquiry in Psychology as discussed by the authors proposed the concept of methodological integrity and recommended its evaluation via its two composite processes: (a) fidelity to the subject matter, which is the process by which researchers develop and maintain allegiance to the phenomenon under study as it is conceived within their tradition of inquiry, and (b) utility in achieving research goals.
Abstract: The current paper presents recommendations from the Task Force on Resources for the Publication of Qualitative Research of the Society for Qualitative Inquiry in Psychology, a section of Division 5 of the American Psychological Association. This initiative was a response to concerns by authors that reviews of qualitative research articles frequently utilize inflexible sets of procedures and provide contradictory feedback when evaluating acceptability. In response, the Task Force proposes the concept of methodological integrity and recommends its evaluation via its two composite processes: (a) fidelity to the subject matter, which is the process by which researchers develop and maintain allegiance to the phenomenon under study as it is conceived within their tradition of inquiry, and (b) utility in achieving research goals, which is the process by which researchers select procedures to generate insightful findings that usefully answer their research questions. Questions that guide the evaluation of these processes, example principles, and a flowchart are provided to help authors and reviewers in the process of both research design and review. The consideration of methodological integrity examines whether the implementation of fidelity and utility function coherently together. Researchers and reviewers also examine whether methods further the research goals, are consistent with researchers’ approaches to inquiry, and are tailored to the characteristics of the subject matter and investigators. This approach to evaluation encourages researchers and reviewers to shift from using standardized and decontextualized procedures as criteria for rigor toward assessing the underlying methodological bases for trustworthiness as they function within research projects.

426 citations


Cites methods from "Research Design: Qualitative, Quant..."

  • ...Although these categories are not inclusive of all qualitative approaches, and distinctions among ontology, epistemology, and method are not always clear (Staller, 2013), the delineation of these three traditions has supported diversity in the methods and goals of qualitative research (Creswell, 2013; Morgan, 2007)....

    [...]

  • ...…are not inclusive of all qualitative approaches, and distinctions among ontology, epistemology, and method are not always clear (Staller, 2013), the delineation of these three traditions has supported diversity in the methods and goals of qualitative research (Creswell, 2013; Morgan, 2007)....

    [...]

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1994
TL;DR: The eagerly anticipated fourth edition of the title that pioneered the comparison of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research design, John W, Creswell as discussed by the authors, includes a preliminary consideration of philosophical assumptions, a review of the literature, an assessment of the use of theory in research approaches, and reflections about the importance writing and ethics in scholarly inquiry.
Abstract: The eagerly anticipated fourth edition of the title that pioneered the comparison of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research design. for all three approaches, John W, Creswell includes a preliminary consideration of philosophical assumptions, a review of the literature, an assessment of the use of theory in research approaches, and reflections about the importance writing and ethics in scholarly inquiry.

20,949 citations