scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Proceedings Article

Research on Stylized Facts and Risk Models for Chinese Agricultural Futures Market

01 Jan 2013-
TL;DR: Li et al. as mentioned in this paper built different volatility models (GARCH, APARCH, FIGARCH, FIAPARCH) for the conditional volatility of returns for Chinese agricultural futures indexes, and choose the skewed Student-t distribution, which is more appropriate to depict the typical features of financial assets returns.
Abstract: Agricultural futures market is an important part of modern financial market systems.Almost every government and industry highly values its functions of guiding,hedging and stabilizing markets.Therefore,the market has been growing.The rapid development of China market is the driving force of economic growth. However,little work has been done to detect volatility features and risk characteristics of China market.The main objective of this paper are to(1) build different volatility models(GARCH;APARCH;FIGARCH;FIAPARCH) for the conditional volatility of returns for Chinese agricultural futures indexes,(2) choose the skewed Student-t distribution,which is more appropriate to depict the typical features of financial assets returns,and(3) fully investigate and describe distribution features of Chinese agricultural futures returns. We compute agricultural futures’ VaR(Value at Risk) in different models and adopt both unconditional coverage testing and conditional coverage testing.The application scope and different VaR models are constructed to offer the best VaR measurement for Chinese agricultural futures market.Because of the asymmetrical characteristics of financial asset return distributions,derivatives with the same underlying asset have different VaRs when taking a long-term or short-term position.Therefore,it is meaningful to investigate the right tail and left tail separately in asymmetric return distribution.In this paper,we will test different models in both long and short positions to elaborate their effectiveness and practicability in Chinese agricultural futures market. Our main findings are summarized as follows: (1) The return of Chinese agricultural futures market exhibits relative significant Leptokurtic,fat tailed and skewed distributions,and volatility clustering effect.However,there is no evidence that the volatility of agricultural futures market presents leverage effect like Chinese stock market;(2) Using skewed Student-t distribution can help improve the accuracy of VaR and ES estimation in Chinese agricultural futures market.However,adding the leverage effect and long-memory in volatility models does not benefit the accuracy of VaR and ES estimation;(3) When considering both efficiency of model estimations and accuracy of calculations,we think GARCH-SST model is an excellent choice for risk measurement in Chinese agricultural futures market. This paper has important practical and social implications.We make the case that some statistical characteristics are the stylized facts and GARCH-SST model is a reasonable choice to forecast VaRs of Chinese agricultural futures market.These techniques and empirical results can offer useful theoretic reference and practical approaches for risk measurement in Chinese agricultural futures market.Furthermore,the findings of stylized statistical characteristics of Chinese agricultural futures market have important regulatory sense in position limits and margin ratio,et al.
Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: Li et al. as discussed by the authors adopted CAViaR model to measure the dynamic risk of commodity futures market, and three likelihood ratio tests and one dynamic quantile test were used to compare the predictive performance and applicability in different quantiles of different models.
Abstract: Under the background of OBOR strategic, commodities futures market of China meet new opportunity. It benefits the internationalization of China's futures market and enhances the commodity pricing power that we can management the market risk. By taking the typical industrial and agricultural commodities futures of the Dalian Commodity Exchange in consider, this paper adopts CAViaR model to measure the dynamic risk. Then three likelihood ratio tests and one dynamic quantile test are used to compare the predictive performance and applicability in different quantiles of different models. The empirical results show that the CAViaR model is superior to the traditional GARCH model. Yields of commodity futures presented typical "fat tail" and autocorrelation. The GARCH models, which ignore the "fat tail" and autocorrelation, may be inefficient to measure risk of commodity futures Market. The CAViaR model may be the most suitable risk management tools for commodity futures risk management. 我国大宗商品期货价格风险的CAViaR测度与防范 符增昱, 温煳炜 北京交通大学国际贸易学系,海淀,北京,中国 华中科技大学经济学院,武汉,湖北,中国 498812316@qq.com, 564124958@qq.com 关键词: 商品期货; CAViaR模型; GARCH族模型; 后测检验 中文摘要. “一带一路”战略下中国大宗商品期货市场迎来新的发展契机,科学有效地防范 商品期货市场风险对加速中国期货市场国际化进程、提高中国大宗商品定价权有重要意义。 本文以大连商品期货交易所工业和农业大宗商品期货的典型品种为研究对象,建立基于 CAViaR模型的动态风险测度VaR模型,并同时运用似然比检验和动态分位数检验对各个模型 的精准性进行后测检验,最后研究了不同期货品种风险的动态特征与差异。结果表明,CAViaR 模型的风险预测效果要优于传统的GARCH族模型;商品期货品种呈现典型的“高峰厚尾”和 收益率自相关现象,采用正态分布的GARCH族模型以及忽视收益率自相关的GARCH族模型 来防范大宗商品价格风险需要特别谨慎。在综合考虑了模型便易性、稳健性和准确性后, CAViaR模型是商品期货市场风险管理实践最为适合的风险管理工具。 International Conference on Engineering Management (Iconf-EM 2016) Copyright © 2016, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 30

1 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
30 Nov 2020
TL;DR: In this article, the authors make descriptive statistics and analysis on the logarithm yield of CAFI, discusses the calculation of VaR under the assumption that the residual is subject to the normal distribution, t-distribution, and generalized error distribution.
Abstract: ABSTRACT Taking China Agricultural Products Futures Index (CAFI) as an example, this paper makes descriptive statistics and analysis on the logarithm yield of CAFI, discusses the calculation of VaR under the assumption that the residual is subject to the normal distribution, t-distribution, and generalized error distribution (GED), and tests the accuracy of VaR calculated by each model by Kupiec backtest. The results show that the yield of the CAFI index has the characteristics of "peak and fat tail", volatility aggregation, and asymmetric effect. GARCH (1,1) model under the assumption of normal distribution and GED distribution can truly reflect and measure the risk of the agricultural futures market.

Cites methods from "Research on Stylized Facts and Risk..."

  • ...[4] use two risk measures (VaR and ES) to estimate four agricultural product futures indexes (hard wheat, cotton, sugar, and soybean oil), and the results shows that China’s agricultural product futures market volatility has a "leverage effect"....

    [...]