Resolving a dusty, star-forming SHiZELS galaxy at z = 2.2 with HST, ALMA, and SINFONI on kiloparsec scales
read more
Citations
The ALMA REBELS Survey: Dust Continuum Detections at z > 6.5
The evolving interstellar medium of star-forming galaxies, as traced by Stardust
Cosmic evolution of low-excitation radio galaxies in the LOFAR Two-meter Sky Survey Deep Fields
OUP accepted manuscript
Resolved neutral outflow from a lensed dusty star-forming galaxy at z=2.09
References
SExtractor: Software for source extraction
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
The Chemical Composition of the Sun
Galactic stellar and substellar initial mass function
The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-Forming Galaxies
Related Papers (5)
A spatially resolved study of cold dust, molecular gas, HII regions, and stars in the $z=2.12$ submillimeter galaxy ALESS67.1
ALMA and HST Kiloparsec-scale Imaging of a Quasar-galaxy Merger at Z ≈ 6.2
CO, H 2 O, H 2 O + line and dust emission in a z = 3.63 strongly lensed starburst merger at sub-kiloparsec scales
Frequently Asked Questions (9)
Q2. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Resolving a dusty, star-forming shizels galaxy at z=2.2 with hst, alma and sinfoni on kiloparsec scales" ?
Their deep imaging enables us to recover directly the fainter emission across extended regions of star formation, which are also traced by H𝛼. The high spatial resolution of their data enables us to study emission on kpc scales, and compare SFRs in a spatially-resolved manner. This work highlights the importance of studying galaxies at multiple wavelengths and demonstrates the biases that can be introduced by assuming that calibrations derived using samples of relatively dust-poor galaxies will be appropriate for extremely dusty systems.
Q3. What was the data reduction pipeline used to perform?
In summary, the SINFONI ESOREX data reduction pipeline was used to perform extraction, flat fielding and wavelength calibration, and to create the data cube for each exposure.
Q4. What is the way to study the formation of stars in the Universe?
While studies of wide areas are important in tracking the evolving properties of star-forming galaxies and the build-up of stellar mass in the Universe, understanding the physical processes of star formation within individual galaxies requires higher angular resolution.
Q5. How many bright H emitters could be identified and targeted for IFU spectroscopy?
In particular, by exploiting the wide area HiZELS coverage, a sample of bright H𝛼 emitters ( 𝑓H𝛼 > 0.7 × 10−16 erg s−1cm−2) which by chance lie within 30′′ of bright natural guide stars (𝑅<15) could be identified and targeted for IFU spectroscopy of the H𝛼 line using adaptive optics with the SINFONI Integral Field Unit on the Very Large Telescope (VLT).
Q6. What could be the implications of these offsets?
These offsets could potentially bias interpretations of globalmeasurements (particularly for fits to photometry that focus solely on the rest-frame optical to near-infrared, but also for ‘energy-balance’ spectral energy distribution fitting).
Q7. What is the estimated total infrared luminosity?
The estimated total infrared luminosity is log10 (𝐿TIR/L ) = 12.85 ± 0.01, and the estimated dust attenuation in the 𝑉-band is 𝐴𝑣 = 1.9 ± 0.1.
Q8. How do the authors get the IR luminosity?
The authors also integrate the two-body fits at wavelengths 8 − 1000 𝜇m within the MCMC fit (enabling us to fold in the correlations between fitted parameters), obtaining an estimate for the total IR luminosity, log10 (𝐿TIR/erg s−1) = 46.39 ± 0.02, and log10 (𝐿TIR/L ) = 12.81 ± 0.02.
Q9. What is the effect of visibility weighting on the reduced ALMA image?
The authors used Briggs (robust=0.5) visibility weighting, which assigns higher weights to longer baselines, producing an image with higher angular resolution (see the image in the lower right-hand panel of Figure 1).