scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of plasmonic fiber optic biochemical sensors: improving the limit of detection.

24 Jan 2015-Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (Springer Berlin Heidelberg)-Vol. 407, Iss: 14, pp 3883-3897
TL;DR: An overview of the technologies used to implement surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effects into fiber-optic sensors for chemical and biochemical applications and a survey of results reported over the last ten years is presented.
Abstract: This paper presents a brief overview of the technologies used to implement surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effects into fiber-optic sensors for chemical and biochemical applications and a survey of results reported over the last ten years. The performance indicators that are relevant for such systems, such as refractometric sensitivity, operating wavelength, and figure of merit (FOM), are discussed and listed in table form. A list of experimental results with reported limits of detection (LOD) for proteins, toxins, viruses, DNA, bacteria, glucose, and various chemicals is also provided for the same time period. Configurations discussed include fiber-optic analogues of the Kretschmann–Raether prism SPR platforms, made from geometry-modified multimode and single-mode optical fibers (unclad, side-polished, tapered, and U-shaped), long period fiber gratings (LPFG), tilted fiber Bragg gratings (TFBG), and specialty fibers (plastic or polymer, microstructured, and photonic crystal fibers). Configurations involving the excitation of surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) on continuous thin metal layers as well as those involving localized SPR (LSPR) phenomena in nanoparticle metal coatings of gold, silver, and other metals at visible and near-infrared wavelengths are described and compared quantitatively.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work reviews the progress achieved during the recent five years in immunochemical biosensors (immunosensors) combined with nanoparticles for enhanced sensitivity and introduces antibodies as classic recognition elements.
Abstract: We review the progress achieved during the recent five years in immunochemical biosensors (immunosensors) combined with nanoparticles for enhanced sensitivity. The initial part introduces antibodies as classic recognition elements. The optical sensing part describes fluorescent, luminescent, and surface plasmon resonance systems. Amperometry, voltammetry, and impedance spectroscopy represent electrochemical transducer methods; electrochemiluminescence with photoelectric conversion constitutes a widely utilized combined method. The transducing options function together with suitable nanoparticles: metallic and metal oxides, including magnetic ones, carbon-based nanotubes, graphene variants, luminescent carbon dots, nanocrystals as quantum dots, and photon up-converting particles. These sources merged together provide extreme variability of existing nanoimmunosensing options. Finally, applications in clinical analysis (markers, tumor cells, and pharmaceuticals) and in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms, toxic agents, and pesticides in the environmental field and food products are summarized.

447 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Sensors for Organic Species, New Schemes and Materials, and New SensingSchemes 220 Molecularly Imprinted Polymer (MIP)-Based Sensors 221 Photonic Crystals 223 Author Information 223 Corresponding Authors 223 Notes 223 Biographies 223 Acknowledgments 223 References 223
Abstract: Xu-dong Wang*,† and Otto S. Wolfbeis*,‡ †Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, 200433 Shanghai, P. R. China ‡Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Chemoand Biosensors, University of Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany ■ CONTENTS Books, Reviews, and Articles of General Interest 204 Sensors for (Dissolved) Gases and Vapors 204 Hydrogen 204 Hydrocarbons 206 Oxygen 206 Carbon Dioxide 208 Nitrogen Oxides 208 Other Gases 208 Ammonia 209 Ethanol 209 Other Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)s 210 Sensors for Humidity, Water Fractions, Hydrogen Peroxide, and Hydrazine 211 Humidity 211 Water Fractions in Organic Solvents 212 Hydrogen Peroxide 213 Sensors for pH Values, Ions, and Salinity 213 pH Values 213 Ions 214 Salinity and Ionic Strength 215 Sensors for Organic Species 216 Glucose Sensing 216 Sucrose 217 Oils 217 Other Organics 217 Biosensors 218 Nucleic Acid-Based Biosensors (DNAand Aptamer-Based) 218 Immunosensors 218 Enzymatic Biosensors 219 Other Biosensors 220 New Schemes and Materials 220 New Sensing Schemes 220 Molecularly Imprinted Polymer (MIP)-Based Sensors 221 Photonic Crystals 223 Author Information 223 Corresponding Authors 223 Notes 223 Biographies 223 Acknowledgments 223 References 223

348 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
22 Nov 2016
TL;DR: Examples of applications of optical affinity biosensors based on plasmonic nanostructures for both the detection of chemical and biological substances as well as the investigation of biomolecular interactions are given.
Abstract: This paper reviews fundamentals of optical affinity biosensors based on plasmonic nanostructures and discusses recent advances in the development of this technology, including plasmonic nanostructures and surface plasmon phenomena, advances in sensor instrumentation, and functional coatings. Examples of applications for both the detection of chemical and biological substances as well as the investigation of biomolecular interactions are also given.

293 citations


Cites background from "Review of plasmonic fiber optic bio..."

  • ...In comparison to a conventional fiber-optic SPR sensor employing PSPs propagating along continuous metal films, NP-based fiber optic sensors have a lower sensitivity to interferences causing fluctuations in polarization of light guided by the fiber, and thus have better stability and resolution [214]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An in-depth review of four devices for generating SPR is presented, and optical fiber is finally adopted for a substrate to generate SPR, and key challenges are identified to develop orientation of optical fiber biosensor based on SPR.

272 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on optical refractive index (RI) sensors with no fluorescent labeling required, and utilize two parameters to characterize and compare the performance of optical RI sensors: sensitivity to RI change (denoted by symbol SRI) and figure of merit (in short, FoM).
Abstract: DOI: 10.1002/adom.201801433 Scientific American selects plasmonic sensing as the top 10 emerging technologies of 2018.[15] Almost every single new plasmonic or photonic structure would be explored to test its sensing ability.[16–29] These works tend to report the sensing performance of their own structure. Some declare that their sensitivity breaks the world record. However, there is still a missing literature on what the world record really is, the gap between the experiments and the theoretical limit, as well as the differences between metal-based plasmonic sensors and dielectric-based photonic sensors. To push plasmonic and photonic sensors into industrial applications, an optical sensing technology map is absolutely necessary. This review aims to cover a wide range of most representative plasmonic and photonic sensors, and place them into a single map. The sensor performances of different structures will be distinctly illustrated. Future researchers could plot the sensing ability of their new sensors into this technology map and gauge their performances in this field. In this review, we focus on optical refractive index (RI) sensors with no fluorescent labeling required. We will utilize two parameters to characterize and compare the performance of optical RI sensors: sensitivity to RI change (denoted by symbol SRI) and figure of merit (in short, FoM). For simplicity, we restrict our discussions to bulk RI change, where the change in RI occurs within the whole sample. There is another case where the RI variation occurs only within a very small volume close to the sensor surface. This surface RI sensitivity is proportional to the bulk RI sensitivity, the ratio of the thickness of the layer within which the surface RI variation occurs, and the penetration depth of the optical mode.[6] The bulk RI sensitivity defines the ratio of the change in sensor output (e.g., resonance angle, intensity, or resonant wavelength) to the bulk RI variations. Here, we limit our discussions to the spectral interrogations and the bulk RI sensitivity SRI is given by[3,5–7,30]

259 citations

References
More filters
Book
15 May 2007
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the role of surface plasmon polaritons at metal/insulator interfaces and their application in the propagation of surfaceplasmon waveguides.
Abstract: Fundamentals of Plasmonics.- Electromagnetics of Metals.- Surface Plasmon Polaritons at Metal / Insulator Interfaces.- Excitation of Surface Plasmon Polaritons at Planar Interfaces.- Imaging Surface Plasmon Polariton Propagation.- Localized Surface Plasmons.- Electromagnetic Surface Modes at Low Frequencies.- Applications.- Plasmon Waveguides.- Transmission of Radiation Through Apertures and Films.- Enhancement of Emissive Processes and Nonlinearities.- Spectroscopy and Sensing.- Metamaterials and Imaging with Surface Plasmon Polaritons.- Concluding Remarks.

7,238 citations

Book
05 Oct 2014
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a survey of optical spectra of Elemental Metal Clusters and Chain Aggregates and discuss experimental results and experimental methods for metal clustering experiments.
Abstract: 1. Introduction.- 2. Theoretical Considerations.- 3. Experimental Methods.- 4. Experimental Results and Discussion.- A.1 Tables: Optical Spectroscopy Experiments with Metal Clusters.- A.2 Survey of Optical Spectra of Elemental Metal Clusters and Chain-Aggregates.- A.3 Mie Computer Program.- References.

6,405 citations


"Review of plasmonic fiber optic bio..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Furthermore, SPR is meant here in its broadest possible sense, i.e., for the measurement of the properties of light waves interacting with nanoscale metal particles or films [1] [2] [3] ....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Main application areas are outlined and examples of applications of SPR sensor technology are presented and future prospects of SPR technology are discussed.
Abstract: Since the first application of the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) phenomenon for sensing almost two decades ago, this method has made great strides both in terms of instrumentation development and applications. SPR sensor technology has been commercialized and SPR biosensors have become a central tool for characterizing and quantifying biomolecular interactions. This paper attempts to review the major developments in SPR technology. Main application areas are outlined and examples of applications of SPR sensor technology are presented. Future prospects of SPR sensor technology are discussed.

5,127 citations

Book
03 May 1988
TL;DR: In this article, surface plasmons on smooth surfaces were used for light scattering at rough surfaces without an ATR device, and surface plasmon on gratings for enhanced roughness.
Abstract: Surface plasmons on smooth surfaces.- Surface plasmons on surfaces of small roughness.- Surfaces of enhanced roughness.- Light scattering at rough surfaces without an ATR device.- Surface plasmons on gratings.- Conclusions.

4,890 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work presents a meta-analysis of the literature on food quality and safety analysis and its applications in the context of veterinary drugs and drugs and drug-Induced Antibodies, which focuses on the role of canine coronavirus in the veterinary industry.
Abstract: 5.1. Detection Formats 475 5.2. Food Quality and Safety Analysis 477 5.2.1. Pathogens 477 5.2.2. Toxins 479 5.2.3. Veterinary Drugs 479 5.2.4. Vitamins 480 5.2.5. Hormones 480 5.2.6. Diagnostic Antibodies 480 5.2.7. Allergens 481 5.2.8. Proteins 481 5.2.9. Chemical Contaminants 481 5.3. Medical Diagnostics 481 5.3.1. Cancer Markers 481 5.3.2. Antibodies against Viral Pathogens 482 5.3.3. Drugs and Drug-Induced Antibodies 483 5.3.4. Hormones 483 5.3.5. Allergy Markers 483 5.3.6. Heart Attack Markers 484 5.3.7. Other Molecular Biomarkers 484 5.4. Environmental Monitoring 484 5.4.1. Pesticides 484 5.4.2. 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) 485 5.4.3. Aromatic Hydrocarbons 485 5.4.4. Heavy Metals 485 5.4.5. Phenols 485 5.4.6. Polychlorinated Biphenyls 487 5.4.7. Dioxins 487 5.5. Summary 488 6. Conclusions 489 7. Abbreviations 489 8. Acknowledgment 489 9. References 489

3,698 citations