Q1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Pii: s1053-8100(02)00009-0" ?
In this commentary I evaluate the claim made by Keenan, Nelson, O Connor, and Pascual-Leone ( 2001 ) that since self-recognition results from right hemispheric activity, self-awareness too is likely to be produced by the activity of the same hemisphere. In a second study normal participants exhibited significantly greater right hemispheric activity ( as measured by evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation ) while presented with pictures containing elements of their own face, as opposed to images of a famous person. The fact that the right hemisphere seems to be involved in self-recognition is both intriguing and informative ; but then the authors go on to suggest that ‘ ‘ neural substrates of the right hemisphere may selectively participate in processes linked to self-awareness ’ ’ ( Keenan et al., 2001, p. 305 ) —a problematic claim I wish to closely examine here. It is very difficult to determine the exact meaning of ‘ ‘ self-awareness ’ ’ in the Keenan et al. ( 2001 ) article since the authors do not explicitly define this notion. Finally, recent research suggests that inner speech ( which is associated with left hemispheric activity ) is linked to self-awareness—an observation that further casts doubt on the existence of a right hemispheric self-awareness. In a widely publicized communication published in Nature, Keenan et al. ( 2001 ) report data suggesting that self-recognition would be the result of right hemispheric activity. The basic hypothesis states that to recognize oneself one must first know who one is—one must possess a ‘ ‘ self-concept, ’ ’ which presupposes selfobservation ; furthermore, exhibiting self-directed behaviors in front of a mirror would indicate that one is capable of becoming the object of one s attention, which is the very definition of self-awareness ( Duval & Wicklund, 1972 ; Mead, 1934 ). More precisely, Gallup ( e. g., 1983 ) maintains that some primates are selfaware not only because they show self-recognition, but also because they emit behaviors in their natural environment ( deception, altruism, empathy, etc. ) that strongly suggest an ability to ponder potential intentions and emotions in others— behaviors that presuppose an access to their own mental states.