Risk factors associated with deep surgical site infections after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 56,216 knees.
01 May 2013-Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume (J Bone Joint Surg Am)-Vol. 95, Iss: 9, pp 775-782
TL;DR: Use of a comprehensive infection surveillance system, combined with a total joint replacement registry, identified patient and surgical factors associated with infection following total knee arthroplasty in a large sample.
Abstract: Background: Deep surgical site infection following total knee arthroplasty is a devastating complication. Patient and surgical risk factors for this complication have not been thoroughly examined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors associated with deep surgical site infection following total knee arthroplasty in a large U.S. integrated health-care system.
Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively followed cohort of primary total knee arthroplasties recorded in a total joint replacement registry from 2001 to 2009 was conducted. Records were screened for deep surgical site infection with use of a validated algorithm, and the results were adjudicated by chart review. Patient factors, surgical factors, and surgeon and hospital characteristics were identified with use of the total joint replacement registry. Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors associated with deep surgical site infection.
Results: A total of 56,216 total knee arthroplasties were identified; 63.0% were done in women, the average age of the patients was 67.4 years (standard deviation [SD] = 9.6), and the average body mass index (BMI) was 32 kg/m2 (SD = 6). The incidence of deep surgical site infection was 0.72% (404/56,216). In a fully adjusted model, patient factors associated with deep surgical site infection included a BMI of ≥35 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.47), diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.28), male sex (HR = 1.89), an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of ≥3 (HR = 1.65), a diagnosis of osteonecrosis (HR = 3.65), and a diagnosis of posttraumatic arthritis (HR = 3.23). Hispanic race was protective (HR = 0.69). Protective surgical factors included use of antibiotic irrigation (HR = 0.67), a bilateral procedure (HR = 0.51), and a lower annual hospital volume (HR = 0.33). Surgical risk factors included quadriceps-release exposure (HR = 4.76) and the use of antibiotic-laden cement (HR = 1.53). In a subanalysis, operative time was a risk factor, with a 9% increased risk per fifteen-minute increment.
Conclusions: Use of a comprehensive infection surveillance system, combined with a total joint replacement registry, identified patient and surgical factors associated with infection following total knee arthroplasty in a large sample. High-risk patients should be counseled, and modifiable clinical conditions should be optimized. Use of antibiotic irrigation should be encouraged, but antibiotic-laden cement may not be useful.
Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: The recently proposed consensus definitions of PJI and approaches to accurate diagnosis are reviewed in detail and an overview of the treatment and prevention of this challenging condition is provided.
Abstract: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a tremendous burden for individual patients as well as the global health care industry. While a small minority of joint arthroplasties will become infected, appropriate recognition and management are critical to preserve or restore adequate function and prevent excess morbidity. In this review, we describe the reported risk factors for and clinical manifestations of PJI. We discuss the pathogenesis of PJI and the numerous microorganisms that can cause this devastating infection. The recently proposed consensus definitions of PJI and approaches to accurate diagnosis are reviewed in detail. An overview of the treatment and prevention of this challenging condition is provided.
1,164 citations
Cites background from "Risk factors associated with deep s..."
...Diabetes mellitus has also been associated with an increased risk of PJI (18, 19, 21, 29)....
[...]
...However, obesity has remained an independent risk factor after adjustment for other covariates in several studies (18, 23)....
[...]
...A prolonged procedure duration is associated with an increased risk of PJI (8, 25, 26, 44, 46, 47), with a 9% increase in risk for each additional 15-min increment (18)....
[...]
...However, only 25% of patients in that early study received perioperative antimicrobials, and subsequent large studies have not shown a benefit when modern infection control practices are also used (17, 18, 26, 462)....
[...]
03 Nov 2016
TL;DR: New guidelines for reducing health care associated infections related to surgery include 29 concrete recommendations distilled by 20 of the world’s leading experts from 26 reviews of the latest evidence to address the increasing burden of health careassociated infections on both patients and health care systems globally.
Abstract: The World Health Organization (WHO) has released new guidelines [1] for reducing health care associated infections related to surgery. The new guidelines include 29 concrete recommendations distilled by 20 of the world’s leading experts from 26 reviews of the latest evidence. The recommendations are designed to address the increasing burden of health care associated infections on both patients and health care systems globally. The guidelines include 13 recommendations for the period before surgery, and 16 for preventing infections during and after surgery. They range from simple precautions such as ensuring that patients bathe or shower before surgery and the best way for surgical teams to clean their hands, to guidance on when to use antibiotics to prevent infections, what disinfectants to use before incision, and which sutures to use.
536 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed evidence-based and expert consensus-based recommendations on the basis of an extensive list of preventive measures for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs).
Abstract: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common health-care-associated infections in developing countries, but they also represent a substantial epidemiological burden in high-income countries. The prevention of these infections is complex and requires the integration of a range of preventive measures before, during, and after surgery. No international guidelines are available and inconsistencies in the interpretation of evidence and recommendations in national guidelines have been identified. Considering the prevention of SSIs as a priority for patient safety, WHO has developed evidence-based and expert consensus-based recommendations on the basis of an extensive list of preventive measures. We present in this Review 16 recommendations specific to the intraoperative and postoperative periods. The WHO recommendations were developed with a global perspective and they take into account the balance between benefits and harms, the evidence quality level, cost and resource use implications, and patient values and preferences.
506 citations
TL;DR: Prolonged operative time can increase the risk of SSI and hospitals should focus efforts to reduce operative time, given the importance of SSIs on patient outcomes and health care economics.
Abstract: Background: The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) across surgical procedures, specialties, and conditions is reported to vary from 0.1% to 50%. Operative duration is often cited as an independent and potentially modifiable risk factor for SSI. The objective of this systematic review was to provide an in-depth understanding of the relation between operating time and SSI. Patients and Methods: This review included 81 prospective and retrospective studies. Along with study design, likelihood of SSI, mean operative times, time thresholds, effect measures, confidence intervals, and p values were extracted. Three meta-analyses were conducted, whereby odds ratios were pooled by hourly operative time thresholds, increments of increasing operative time, and surgical specialty. Results: Pooled analyses demonstrated that the association between extended operative time and SSI typically remained statistically significant, with close to twice the likelihood of SSI observed across various time thresho...
383 citations
TL;DR: The results support the consideration of diabetes as an independent risk factor for SSIs for multiple surgical procedure types and Continued efforts are needed to improve surgical outcomes for diabetic patients.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To determine the independent association between diabetes and surgical site infection (SSI) across multiple surgical procedures. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS Studies indexed in PubMed published between December 1985 and through July 2015 were identified through the search terms "risk factors" or "glucose" and "surgical site infection." A total of 3,631 abstracts were identified through the initial search terms. Full texts were reviewed for 522 articles. Of these, 94 articles met the criteria for inclusion. Standardized data collection forms were used to extract study-specific estimates for diabetes, blood glucose levels, and body mass index (BMI). A random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates, and meta-regression was used to evaluate specific hypothesized sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS The primary outcome was SSI, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance criteria. The overall effect size for the association between diabetes and SSI was odds ratio (OR)=1.53 (95% predictive interval [PI], 1.11-2.12; I2, 57.2%). SSI class, study design, or patient BMI did not significantly impact study results in a meta-regression model. The association was higher for cardiac surgery 2.03 (95% PI, 1.13-4.05) compared with surgeries of other types (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS These results support the consideration of diabetes as an independent risk factor for SSIs for multiple surgical procedure types. Continued efforts are needed to improve surgical outcomes for diabetic patients. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;37(1):88-99.
342 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: These large projected increases in demand for total hip and knee arthroplasties provide a quantitative basis for future policy decisions related to the numbers of orthopaedic surgeons needed to perform these procedures and the deployment of appropriate resources to serve this need.
Abstract: Background: Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of revision total hip and knee arthroplasties performed in the United States. The purpose of this study was to formulate projections for the number of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties that will be performed in the United States through 2030.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1990 to 2003) was used in conjunction with United States Census Bureau data to quantify primary and revision arthroplasty rates as a function of age, gender, race and/or ethnicity, and census region. Projections were performed with use of Poisson regression on historical procedure rates in combination with population projections from 2005 to 2030.
Results: By 2030, the demand for primary total hip arthroplasties is estimated to grow by 174% to 572,000. The demand for primary total knee arthroplasties is projected to grow by 673% to 3.48 million procedures. The demand for hip revision procedures is projected to double by the year 2026, while the demand for knee revisions is expected to double by 2015. Although hip revisions are currently more frequently performed than knee revisions, the demand for knee revisions is expected to surpass the demand for hip revisions after 2007. Overall, total hip and total knee revisions are projected to grow by 137% and 601%, respectively, between 2005 and 2030.
Conclusions: These large projected increases in demand for total hip and knee arthroplasties provide a quantitative basis for future policy decisions related to the numbers of orthopaedic surgeons needed to perform these procedures and the deployment of appropriate resources to serve this need.
7,032 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the NHSN criteria for all healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are presented, including those for the "Big Four" (surgical site infection [SSI], pneumonia [PNEU], bloodstream infection [BSI] and urinary tract infection [UTI]).
4,927 citations
Journal Article•
TL;DR: In this article, the NHSN criteria for all healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are presented, including those for the "Big Four" (surgical site infection [SSI], pneumonia [PNEU], bloodstream infection [BSI] and urinary tract infection [UTI]).
4,849 citations
TL;DR: A risk index was developed to predict a surgical patient's risk of acquiring an SWI as mentioned in this paper, ranging from 0 to 3, is the number of risk factors present among the following: a patient with an American Society of Anesthesiologists preoperative assessment score of 3, 4, or 5, an operation classified as contaminated or dirty-infected, and an operation lasting over T hours, where T depends upon the operative procedure being performed.
1,369 citations
TL;DR: The following independent predictors for periprosthetic joint infection were identified: higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, morbid obesity, bilateral arthroplasty, knee arthro plasty, allogenic transfusion, postoperative atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, and longer hospitalization.
Abstract: Periprosthetic joint infection is one of the most challenging complications of joint arthroplasty. We identified current risk factors of periprosthetic joint infection after modern joint arthroplasty, and determined the incidence and timing of periprosthetic joint infection. We reviewed prospectively collected data from our database on 9245 patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty between January 2001 and April 2006. Periprosthetic joint infections developed in 63 patients (0.7%). Sixty-five percent of periprosthetic joint infections developed within the first year of the index arthroplasty. The infecting organism was isolated in 57 of 63 cases (91%). The most common organisms identified were Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. We identified the following independent predictors for periprosthetic joint infection: higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, morbid obesity, bilateral arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, allogenic transfusion, postoperative atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, and longer hospitalization. This study confirmed some previously implicated factors and identified new variables that predispose patients to periprosthetic joint infection.
1,187 citations